Análisis del impacto del estilo de comunicación del entrenador en el desarrollo de la cohesión grupal, la eficacia colectiva y la satisfacción

  1. Alzate Sáez de Heredia, Ramón
  2. Lázaro, Inmaculada
  3. Ramírez, Amaia
  4. Valencia Garate, José Francisco
Revista:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Ano de publicación: 1997

Volume: 6

Número: 2

Páxinas: 7-26

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de psicología del deporte

Resumo

The present study explores the relationships stablished among four variables: the coach’s communication style, the group cohesion, the collective efficacy and the satisfaction. 84 handball players have participated (45 women and 39 men). The findings obtained support the idea that communication style influences the development of group cohesion; and cohesion is a determinant factor for the perception of collective efficacy and player’s satisfaction.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, C.M. y Martin, M.M. (1995). The effects of communication motives, interaction involvement, and loneliness on satisfaction. Small Group Research, 26, 118-137.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward an unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Brawley, L.R. (1990). Group cohesion: status, problems and future directions. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 355-379.
  • Carron, A.V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sports groups: implications and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
  • Carron, A.V. (1990). Group size in sport and physical activity: social psychological and performance consequences. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 286-304.
  • Carron, A.V. y Chelladurai, P. (1981).The dynamics of group cohesion in sport . Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 123-139.
  • Carron A.V., Widmeyer, W.N. y Brawley, L.R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
  • Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
  • Evans, C.R. y Dions, K.L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
  • Gilmore, S.K. y Fraleigh, P.W. (1993). Style Profile for Communication at Work. Friendly Press: Eugene, Oregon.
  • Insko, C. y Wilson, M. (1977). Interpersonal attraction as a function of social interaction. Citado en W.N. Widmeyer y J.M. Williams (1991) Small Group Research, 22, 548-570.
  • Lázaro, M.I. y Villamarín, F. (1993). Un análisis de la capacidad predictiva de la autoeficacia sobre el rendimiento deportivo en jugadores de baloncesto. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 4, 28-37.
  • Martens, R. y Peterson, J.A. (1971). Group cohesiveness as a determinant of success and member satisfaction in team performance. Citado en Williams, J.M. y Hacker, C.M. (1982). Causal relationships among cohesion, satisfaction and performance in women’s intercollegiate field hockey teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 324-337.
  • Plutchik, R. (1981). Group cohesion in a psycho evolutionary context. Citado en W.N. Widmeyer y J.M. Williams (1991) Small Group Research, 22, 548-570.
  • Prussia, G.E. y Kinicki, A. (1996). A motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness using Social-Cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187-198.
  • Riggs, M.L. y Knight, A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 755-766.
  • Schachter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D. y Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Citado en A.V. Carron (1982) Cohesiveness in sport groups: interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
  • Schriesheim, J.F. (1980). The social context of leader subordinate relations: an investigation of the effects of group cohesiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 183-194.
  • Smaby, M.H., Harrison, T.C. y Nelson, M., (1995). Elementary school counselors as total quality management consultants. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 29, 310-319.
  • Spink, K. (1990a). Collective efficacy in the sport setting. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 380-395.
  • Spink, K. (1990b). Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 301-311.
  • Widmeyer, W.N. y Williams, J.M. (1991). Predicting cohesion in a coacting sport. Small Group Research, 22, 548-570.
  • Williams, J.M. y Hacker, C.M. (1982). Causal relationships among cohesion, satisfaction and performance in women’s intercollegiate field hockey teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 324-337.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet