Computational models, educational implications, and methodological innovationsThe realm of visual word recognition

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adelman, J. S. (2011). Letters in time and retinotopic space. Psychological Review, 118, 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024 811
• Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787
• Adelman, J. S., Gubian, M., & Davis, C. J. (2018). easyNet: A computational modeling software package for cognitive science, bridging the gap between novices and experts [Computer software]. http://adelmanlab.org/easyNet/
• Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. F., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J. S., ... Davis, C. J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y
• Aguasvivas, J., Carreiras, M., Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2020). How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 1867–1882. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9
• Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000242
• Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775–800. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0040
• Angele, B., Baciero, A., Gómez, P., & Perea, M. (2023). Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 151– 167. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01742-y
• Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830050154485
• Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
• Bachmann, C., & Mengheri, L. (2018). Dyslexia and fonts: Is a specific font useful? Brain Sciences, 8(5), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8050089
• Baciero, A., Gómez, P., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Perea, M. (2022). Raeding with the fingres. Towards a universal model of letter position coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 2275–2283. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02078-0
• Baciero, A., Gómez, P., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Perea, M. (2023). Letter-similarity effects in braille word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221142145
• Baciero, A., Labusch, M., Rocabado, F., Perea, M., & Marcet, A. (2021). ¿Por qué es tan fácil falsificar un logo? [Why is it so easy to counterfeit a logo?] Ciencia Cognitiva, 15(2), 24–27. https://www.cienciacognitiva.org/files/2021-3.pdf
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., ... Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193014
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., & Cortese, M. J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing? In J. S. Adelman (Ed.), Visual word recognition: Models and methods, orthography and phonology (pp. 90–115). Psychology Press.
• Balota, D., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd ed. (pp. 285–375). Academic Press.
• Bar-Kochva, I., Korinth, S., & Hasselhorn, M. (2020). Effects of a morpheme-based training procedure on the literacy skills of readers with a reading disability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 1061-1082. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000120
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
• Benmarrakchi, F., & El Kafi, J. (2021). Investigating Reading Experience of Dyslexic Children Through Dyslexia-Friendly Online Learning Environment. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2021010107
• Benyhe, A., Labusch, M., & Perea, M. (2023). Just a mark: Diacritic function does not play a role in the early stages of visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02244-4
• Bowers, J. S., Malhotra, G., Dujmović, M., Montero, M. L., Tsvetkov, C., Biscione, V., ... Blything, R. (2022). Deep problems with Neural Network Models of human vision. Brain and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22002813
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers E. (2016). The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000159
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000159
• Buchanan, E.M., Cuccolo, K., Lewis, S., Heyman, T., Xiaolin, M.M., Iyer, A., ... Zugarramurdi, C. (2022, November). Is priming consistent across languages? Preliminary findings from the SPAML: Semantic Priming Across Many Languages. Spoken presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
• Bürkner, P. C. (2020). Analysing standard progressive matrices (SPM-LS) with Bayesian item response models. Journal of Intelligence, 8, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8010005
• Bürkner, P. C. (2021). Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 100, 1–54. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v100.i05
• Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2021). Frequency effects in reading are powerful—but is contextual diversity the more important variable? Language and Linguistic Compass, 15, e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12444
• Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
• Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1038
• Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2014). The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005
• Carreiras, M., Perea, M., Gil-López, C., Abu Mallouh, R., & Salillas, E. (2013). Neural correlates of visual vs. abstract letter processing in Roman and Arabic scripts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1975– 1985. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00438
• Casaponsa, A., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2016). Lexical organization of language-ambiguous and language- specific words in bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1064977
• Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.006
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
• Commissaire, E. (2022). Do both WRAP and TRAP inhibit the recognition of the French word DRAP? Impact of orthographic markedness on cross-language orthographic priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 1094–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211048770
• Conrad, M., Tamm, S., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2010). Simulating syllable frequency effects within an interactive activation framework. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903356777
• Danböck, S. K., Franke, L. K., Miedl, S. F., Liedlgruber, M., Bürkner, P. C., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2023). Experimental induction of peritraumatic dissociation: The role of negative affect and pain and their psychophysiological and neural correlates. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 164, 104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2023.104289
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
• Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56, 384– 398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
• Dijkstra, T., van Heuven, W. J. B., & Grainger, J. (1998). Simulating cross-language competition with the bilingual interactive activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.933
• Fernández-López, M., & Perea, M. (2023). A letter is a letter and its co-occurrences: Cracking the emergence of position-invariance processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02265-7
• Fernández-López, M., Gómez, P., & Perea, M. (2021a). Which factors modulate letter position coding in pre-literate children? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 708274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708274
• Fernández-López, M., Gómez, P., & Perea, M. (2023). Letter rotations: Through the magnifying glass and what evidence found there. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 38, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2093390
• Fernández-López, M., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2021b). Does orthographic processing emerge rapidly after learning a new script? British Journal of Psychology, 112, 52–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJOP.12469
• Fernández-López, M., Mirault, J., Grainger, J., & Perea, M. (2021c). How resilient is reading to letter rotations? A parafoveal preview investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 2029–2042. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000999
• Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., ... Pallier, C. (2010). The French lexicon project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.488
• Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71
• Gabrieli, J. D. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325(5938), 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171999
• Galliussi, J., Perondi, L., Chia, G., Gerbino, W., & Bernardis, P. (2020). Inter-letter spacing, inter-word spacing, and font with dyslexia-friendly features: testing text readability in people with and without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 70, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00194-x
• García-Orza, J., & Perea, M. (2011). Position coding in two-digit Arabic numbers: Evidence from number decision and same-different tasks. Experimental Psychology, 58, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000071
• Georgiou, G. K., Vieira, A. P. A., Rothou, K. M., Kirby, J. R., Antoniuk, A., Martinez, D., & Guo, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of morphological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 27, 253-271, https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2155524
• Gomez, P., & Perea, M. (2014). Decomposing encoding and decisional components in visual-word recognition: A diffusion model analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2455–2466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.937447
• Gomez, P., & Perea, M. (2020). Masked identity priming reflects an encoding advantage in developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 199, 104911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104911
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
• Gómez, P., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2021). Are better young readers more likely to confuse their mother with their mohter? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1542–1552. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211012960
• Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x
• Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A "mid-level" vision of reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistic Compass, 3, 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
• Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1–23). Nova Science Publishers.
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011.00054
• Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. J. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865–884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865
• Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189– 195. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210696
• Guasch, M., Boada, J., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Ferré, P. (2022). Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01959-5
• Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2022). The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study. Cognition, 218, 104938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104938
• Gutiérrez-Sigut, E., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2019). Tracking the time course of letter visual-similarity effects during word recognition: A masked priming ERP investigation. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 19, 966–984. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-019-00696-1
• Hakvoort, B., van den Boer, M., Leenaars, T., Bos, P., & Tijms, J. (2017). Improvements in reading accuracy as a result of increased interletter spacing are not specific to children with dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.010
• Hannagan, T., Agrawal, A., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2021). Emergence of a compositional neural code for written words: Recycling of a convolutional neural network for reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 118, e2104779118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104779118
• Hasenäcker, J., Ktori, M., & Crepaldi, D. (2021). Morpheme position coding in reading development as explored with a letter search task. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.153
• Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré, P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957
• Hsiao, Y., & Nation, K. (2018). Semantic diversity, frequency and the development of lexical quality in children’s word reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.08.005
• Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Wimmer, H., & Zorzi, M. (2004). Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition, 91, 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.006
• Izura, C., Pérez, M. A., Agallou, E., Wright, V. C., Marín, J., Stadthagen-González, H., & Ellis, A. W. (2011). Age/order of acquisition effects and the cumulative learning of foreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 32-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.002
• Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–188). Erlbaum.
• Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.209
• Jones, M. N., Johns, B. T., & Recchia, G. (2012). The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026727
• Joo, S. J., White, A. L., Strodtman, D. J., & Yeatman, J. D. (2018). Optimizing text for an individual's visual system: The contribution of visual crowding to reading difficulties. Cortex, 103, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.013
• Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 684–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.684
• Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., Castles, A., Friedmann, N., & McArthur, G. (2012). When ‘slime’ becomes ‘smile’: Developmental letter position dyslexia in English. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3681–3692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.016
• Labusch, M., Massol, S., Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2023). Are goats chèvres, chévres, chēvres, and chevres? Unveiling the orthographic code of diacritical vowels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49, 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001212
• Lázaro, M., García L., Illera V. (2021). Morpho-orthographic segmentation of opaque and transparent derived words: New evidence for Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820977038
• Li, X., Huang, L., Yao, P., & Hyönä, J. (2022). Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022- 00022-6
• Łuniewska, M., Wójcik, M., & Jednoróg, K. (2022). The effect of inter-letter spacing on reading performance and eye movements in typically reading and dyslexic children. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101576
• Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 741–760. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8
• Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2017). Is nevtral NEUTRAL? Visual similarity effects in the early phases of written-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 1180–1185. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1180-9
• Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2018a). Can I order a burger at rnacdonalds.com? Visual similarity effects of multi-letter combinations at the early stages of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 44, 699–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000477
• Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2018b). Visual letter similarity effects during sentence reading: Evidence from the boundary technique. Acta Psychologica, 190, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.007
• Marcet, A., & Perea, M. (2022). Does omitting the accent mark in a word affect sentence reading? Evidence from Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211044694
• Marcet, A., Fernández-López, M., Baciero, A., Sesé, A., & Perea, M. (2022). What are the letters e and é in a language with vowel reduction? The case of Catalan. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43, 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000497
• Marcet, A., Fernández-López, M., Labusch, M., & Perea, M. (2021). The omission of accent marks does not hinder word recognition: Evidence from Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 794923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794923
• Marcet, A., Perea, M., Baciero, A., & Gómez, P. (2019). Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1344–1353. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1747021818789876
• Marinus, E., Mostard, M., Segers, E., Schubert, T. M., Madelaine, A., & Wheldall, K. (2016). A special font for people with dyslexia: Does it work and, if so, why? Dyslexia, 22, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1527
• Massol, S., & Grainger, J. (2022). Effects of horizontal displacement and inter-character spacing on transposed-character effects in same-different matching. PLoS ONE, 17, e0265442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265442
• Massol, S., Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M., & Grainger, J. (2013). Evidence for letter-specific position coding mechanisms. PLoS ONE, 8, e68460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing: A handbook of models, programs, and exercises. MIT Press.
• Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. (2020). Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 112, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092
• Mittterer, H. (2022). A “names-as-fixed-effect fallacy” in studies of name-based racial discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, e2209603119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209603119
• Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366
• Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002
• Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation–Verification model for letter and word recognition: The word-superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573– 594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.89.5.573
• Pagán, A., Blythe, H. I., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). The influence of children’s reading ability on initial letter position encoding during a reading-like task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1186–1203. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000989
• Pan, J., Liu, M., Li, H., & Yan, M. (2021). Chinese children benefit from alternating-color words in sentence reading. Reading and Writing, 34, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10067-9
• Paterson, K. B., Alcock, A., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Morphological priming during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.485392
• Pathak, A., Velasco, C., & Calvert, G. A. (2019). Identifying counterfeit brand logos: On the importance of the first and last letters of a logotype. European Journal of Marketing, 53, 2109–2125. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2017-0586
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829–841. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196438
• Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with non-adjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
• Perea, M., & Panadero, V. (2014). Does viotin activate violin more than viocin? On the use of visual cues during visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology, 61, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000223
• Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 767–777. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.767
• Perea, M., & Wang, X. (2017). Do alternating-color words facilitate reading aloud text in Chinese? Evidence with developing and adult readers. Memory and Cognition, 45, 1160–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0717-0
• Perea, M., Baciero, A., Labusch, M., Fernández-López, M., & Marcet, A. (2022a). Are brand names special words? Letter visual-similarity affects the identification of brand names, but not common words. British Journal of Psychology, 113, 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12557
• Perea, M., Fernández-López, M., & Marcet, A. (2020). What is the letter é? Scientific Studies of Reading, 24, 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1689570
• Perea, M., Giner, L., Marcet, A., & Gomez, P. (2016a). Does extra interletter spacing help text reading in skilled adult readers? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, e26. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.28
• Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Baciero, A. (2023a). Do diacritics entail an early processing cost in the absence of abstract representations? Evidence from masked priming in English. Language and Speech, 66, 105– 117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309221078321
• Perea, M., Hyönä, J., & Marcet, A. (2022b). Does vowel harmony affect visual word recognition? Evidence from Finnish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48, 2004–2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000907
• Perea, M., Jiménez, M., Talero, F., & López-Cañada, S. (2015). Letter-case information and the identification of brand names. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12071
• Perea, M., Labusch, M., & Marcet, A. (2022c). How are words with diacritical vowels represented in the mental lexicon? Evidence from Spanish and German. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 37, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1985536
• Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Vergara-Martínez, M. (2016b). Phonological-lexical feedback during early abstract encoding: The case of deaf readers. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146265
• Perea, M., Marcet, A., Baciero, A., & Gómez, P. (2023b). Reading about a RELO-VUTION. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01720-9
• Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gomez P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22, 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.001
• Perea, M., Soares, A. P., & Comesaña, M. (2013). Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word- identification times in young readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.014
• Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Lexical quality revisited. In E. Segers & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven (pp. 51–68). John Benjamins.
• Perry, C. (2023). Graphemes are used when reading: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulation using word norms from mega-studies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221086533
• Plaut, D. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 765–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386682
• Plummer, P., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034058
• Pollatsek, A., & Treiman. R. (2015) (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook on Reading. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324576.001.0001
• Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.148
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with the language- as-fixed-effect- fallacy: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2650
• Ratcliff, R., & Hendrickson, A. T. (2021). Do data from mechanical Turk subjects replicate accuracy, response time, and diffusion modeling results? Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2302–2325. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01573-x
• Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.159
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692
• Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
• Reichle, E. (2021). Computational Models of Reading: A Handbook. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195370669.001.0001
• Rodd, J. M., Cai, Z. G., Betts, H. N., Hanby, B., Hutchinson, C., & Adler, A. (2016). The impact of recent and long-term experience on access to word meanings: Evidence from large-scale internet-based experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.006
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. Laberge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265–303). Erlbaum.
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.60
• Rumelhart, D. E., & Siple, P. (1974). Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. Psychological Review, 81, 99–118. https://doi.org/10. 1037/h0036117
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198
• Schotter, E. R., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial- attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects. Visual Cognition, 22, 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2013.873508
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
• Selfridge, O. G. (1959). Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In D. V. Blake and A. M. Uttley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the mechanisation of thought processes (pp. 511–529). H.M. Stationary Office
• Sellés, P., Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Gilabert, R. (2008). BIL 3–6. Batería de Inicio a la Lectura [Battery to Assess the Abilities Related with Early Reading Acquisition]. Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación.
• Siegelman, N., Schroeder, S., Acartürk, C., Ahn, H. D., Alexeeva, S., Amenta, S., ... & Kuperman, V. (2022). Expanding horizons of cross-linguistic research on reading: The Multilingual Eye-movement Corpus (MECO). Behavior Research Methods, 54, 2843–2863. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021- 01772-6
• Slattery, T. J., Yates, M., & Angele, B. (2016). Interword and interletter spacing effects during reading revisited: Interactions with word and font characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 406-422. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000104
• Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125, 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000119
• Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2022) (Eds.). The Science of Reading: A Handbook, 2nd Edition. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119705116
• Song, Z., Liang, X., Wang, Y., & Yan, G. (2021). Effect of alternating-color words on oral reading in grades 2–5 Chinese children: Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 34, 2627–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10164-3
• Tapia, J. L., Rosa, E., Rocabado, F., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2022). Does narrator variability facilitate incidental word learning in the classroom? Memory & Cognition, 50, 278–295. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01228-4
• Torkildsen, J. v. K., Bratlie, S. S., Kristensen, J. K., Gustafsson, J.-E., Lyster, S.-A. H., Snow, C., Hulme, C., Mononen, R.-M., Næss, K.-A. B., López-Pedersen, A., Wie, O. B., & Hagtvet, B. (2022). App-based morphological training produces lasting effects on word knowledge in primary school children: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114, 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000688
• Traficante, D. (2012). From graphemes to morphemes: An alternative way to improve skills in children with dyslexia. Revista de investigación en Logopedia, 2, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.5209/rlog.58701
• Trifonova, I. V., & Adelman, J. S. (2019). A delay in processing for repeated letters: Evidence from megastudies. Cognition, 189, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.005
• Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2009). The effects of training of morphological structure on spelling derived words by dyslexic adolescents. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 565–592. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X371915
• Van Heuven, W. J., & Dijkstra, T. (2010). Language comprehension in the bilingual brain: fMRI and ERP support psycholinguistic models. Brain Research Reviews, 64, 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.03.002
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Comesaña, M., & Perea, M. (2017). The ERP signature of the contextual diversity effect in visual word recognition. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 17, 461–474. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0491-7
• Vergara-Martínez, M., Gomez, P., Jiménez, M., & Perea, M. (2015). Lexical enhancement during prime- target integration: ERP evidence from matched-case identity priming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 492–504. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0330-7
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03196158
• Williams, C. C., Perea, M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). Previewing the neighborhood: The role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1072
• Yin, D., Bowers, J., & Biscione, V. (2023). Convolutional Neural Networks trained to identify words provide a good account of visual form priming effects. Computational Brain & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2289281/v1
• Zhou, W., Wang, A., Shu, H., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2018). Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading. Memory & Cognition, 46, 729–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0797-5
• Zhou, W., Ye, W., & Yan, M. (2020). Alternating-color words facilitate reading and eye movements among second-language learners of Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000211
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Coltheart, M. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440050114570
• Zorzi M., Houghton G., & Butterworth B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1131– 1161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131
• Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., ... Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Extra- large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 11455–11459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205566109