Eficacia del programa Prev@cib 2.0 en cyberbullying, conductas de ayuda y percepción de ayuda del profesor

  1. Ortega-Barón, Jessica 1
  2. Buelga, Sofía 2
  3. Cava, María Jesús 2
  4. Iranzo, Begoña 3
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  3. 3 Universidad Internacional de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Internacional de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00gjj5n39

Show affiliations +
Journal:
Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

ISSN: 1696-2095

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 20

Issue: 57

Pages: 427-448

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25115/EJREP.V20I57.6684 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Introduction:  The increase and concern that cyberbullying arouses in the educational community shows the need for evidence-based programs to prevent and intervene in this type of violence. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the Prev@cib 2.0 program to reduce cyberbullying and promote helpful behaviors and perception of help from the teacher.   Method: A pre-post-test design of repeated measures was used with a control group and intervention group, that received the Prev@cib 2.0 program for 4 months. 580 adolescents between 12 and 17 years (M =13.52, SD =1.27) participated in the study.   Results: The results showed a significant decrease in cybervictimization and cyberaggression, and an increase in helping behaviors and perception of teacher help in the intervention group after the program, compared to the control group.   Discussion or Conclusion: These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the Prev@cib 2.0 to prevent cyberbullying in the adolescence. Furthermore, this study shows the importance of the involvement of the entire educational community to prevent this problem.

Bibliographic References

  • Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N. y Memme-dov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents. CyberPsychology y Behav-ior, 11(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016
  • Barlińska, J., Szuster, A. y Winiewski, M. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander be-havior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799
  • Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A. y De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Comput-ers in Human Behavior, 31, 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
  • Brochado, S., Soares, S. y Fraga, S. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying preva-lence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, y Abuse, 18(5), 523-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016641668
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1981). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA.
  • Buelga, S., Iranzo, B., Cava, M.-J. y Torralba, E. (2015). Psychological profile of adolescent cyberbullying aggressors. Revista de Psicología Social, 30(2), 382-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1016754
  • Buelga, S., Ortega-Barón, J. y Torralba, E. (2016, octubre 20). Psychometric propierties of re-vised scales of cyberbullying (CybVic_R, CybAG_R). II Congreso Internacional de la So-ciedad Científica Española de Psicología Social, Elche, Spain.
  • Buelga, S., Postigo, J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Cava, M.-J. y Ortega-Barón, J. (2020). Cyberbullying among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the CYB-AGS Cyber-Aggressor Scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093090
  • Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S. y Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavior-al correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132
  • Cava, M. J. y Musitu, G. (2002). La conviencia en la escuela. Phepfulós: Ibérica.
  • Chaux, E., Velásquez, A. M. Schultze-Krumbholz, A. y Scheithauer, H. (2016). Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program media heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying: Effects of Media Heroes on traditional bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21637
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. y Fernández-Antelo, I. (2020). Connectivity as a mediating mechanism in the cybervictimization process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124567
  • Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A. y Ortega, R. (2016). Impact of the ConRed program on different cyberbulling roles: Impact of the ConRed Program. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21608
  • Del Rey, R., Ortega-Ruiz, R. y Casas, J. (2019). Asegúrate: An intervention program against cyberbullying based on teachers’ commitment and on design of its instructional materi-als. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030434
  • DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Deboutte, G., Herrewijn, L., Malliet, S., Pabian, S., Van Broeckhoven, F., De Troyer, O., Deglorie, G., Van Hoecke, S., Samyn, K. y De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2018). The efficacy of the Friendly Attac serious digital game to promote prosocial bystander behavior in cyberbullying among young adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.011
  • Dilmaç, B., Yurt, E., Aydın, M. y Kaşarcı, İ. (2016). Predictive relationship between humane values of adolescents cyberbullying and cyberbullying sensibility. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.38.14123
  • Estrada-Esparza, O. N., Zárate-Conde, G. D. y Izquierdo-Campos, I. (2016). Género, violencia y el discurso del (cyber) bullying en el nivel de educación media superior. Opción, 32(13), 954-978. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31048483045
  • Fernández-Ballesteros, R. y Sierra, B. (1989). Escalas de clima social FES, WES, CIES y CES. TEA Ediciones.
  • Flisher, A. J., Evans, J., Muller, M. y Lombard, C. (2004). Brief report: Test–retest reliability of self-reported adolescent risk behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 27(2), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2001.10.001
  • Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L. y Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying inter-vention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002
  • Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: Una revisión. Interna-tional Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 233-254. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/560/56019292003.pdf
  • Garaigordobil, M. y Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2014). Cyberprogram 2.0. Un programa de inter-vención para prevenir y reducir el cyberbulling. Ediciones Pirámide.
  • García-Maldonado, G., Martínez-Salazar, G. J., Saldívar-González, A., Sánchez-Nuncio, R., Martínez-Perales, G. M. y Barrientos-Gómez, M. del C. (2011). Factores de riesgo y con-secuencias del cyberbullying en un grupo de adolescentes. Asociación con bullying tra-dicional. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México, 69(6), 463-474. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/bmhim/hi-2012/hi126g.pdf
  • Giménez Gualdo, A. M., Luengo Latorre, J. A. y Bartrina, M. J. (2017). ¿ Qué hacen los meno-res en Internet? Usos de las TIC, estrategias de supervisión parental y exposición a ries-gos. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.43.16123
  • González Calatayud, V., Prendes Espinosa, M. P. y López Pina, J. A. (2016). La percepción so-bre el ciberacoso del profesorado de secundaria de la Región de Murcia. Innoeduca. In-ternational Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 2(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.20548/innoeduca.2016.v2i2.1974
  • González-Cabrera, J., Machimbarrena, J. M., Fernández-González, L., Prieto-Fidalgo, Á., Verga-ra-Moragues, E. y Calvete, E. (2019). Health-Related Quality of Life and Cumulative Psychosocial Risks in Adolescents. Youth y Society, 0044118X1987946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19879461
  • Hellison, D. y Walsh, D. (2002). Responsibility-based youth programs evaluation: Investigating the investigations. Quest, 54(4), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491780
  • Hinduja, S. y Patchin, J. W. (2014). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press.
  • Iranzo, B., Buelga, S., Cava, M.-J. y Ortega-Barón, J. (2019). Cyberbullying, psychosocial ad-justment, and suicidal ideation in adolescence. Psychosocial Intervention, 28(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2019a5
  • Kowalski, R. M. y Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13-S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
  • Li, Q. (2009). Cyberbullying in schools: An examination of preservice teachers’ perception. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2DK5G
  • Lo Cricchio, M. G., García-Poole, C., Brinke, L. W., Bianchi, D. y Menesini, E. (2021). Moral disengagement and cyberbullying involvement: A systematic review. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 271-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1782186
  • Moos, R., Moos, S. y Trickett, E. (1984). FES, WES y CES. Escalas de clima social. TEA Edi-ciones.
  • Navarro, R., Yubero, S. y Larrañaga, E. (2015). Psychosocial Risk Factors for Involvement in Bullying Behaviors: Empirical Comparison Between Cyberbullying and Social Bullying Victims and Bullies. School Mental Health, 7(4), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-015-9157-9
  • Ortega-Barón, J., Buelga, S., Ayllón, E., Martínez-Ferrer, B. y Cava, M.-J. (2019). Effects of Intervention Program Prev@cib on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(4), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040527
  • Ortega-Barón, J., Buelga-Vasquez, S. y Cava-Caballero, M. J. (2016). The influence of school climate and family climate among adolescents victims of cyberbullying. Comunicar, 24(46), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.3916/C46-2016-06
  • Özgür, H. (2020). A systematic review on cyberbullying interventions and preventions. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i1.3373
  • Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Grotpeter, J. K., Ingram, K., Michaelson, L., Spinney, E., Valido, A., Sheikh, A. E., Torgal, C. y Robinson, L. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Pre-vention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01259-y
  • Ševčíková, A., Macháčková, H., Wright, M. F., Dědková, L. y Černá, A. (2015). Social support seeking in relation to parental attachment and peer relationships among victims of cyber-bullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 25(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2015.1
  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. y Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbully-ing: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
  • Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Ristkari, T. y Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbully-ing among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
  • Stauffer, S., Heath, M. A., Coyne, S. M. y Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers' perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 352-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21603
  • Thompson, R. E. y Smith, P. K. (2011). The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. (Research Brief DFE-RR098.).
  • Torgal, C., Espelage, D. L., Polanin, J. R., Ingram, K. M., Robinson, L. E., El Sheikh, A. J. y Valido, A. (2021). A meta-analysis of school-based cyberbullying prevention programs’ impact on cyber-bystander behavior. School Psychology Review, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1913037
  • Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. En Reading and understanding multi-variate statistics (pp. 245-276). American Psychological Association.
  • Williford, A., Elledge, L. C., Boulton, A. J., DePaolis, K. J., Little, T. D. y Salmivalli, C. (2013). Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization fre-quency among Finnish youth. Journal of Clinical Child y Adolescent Psychology, 42(6), 820-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.787623
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment Theory. En J. Rappaport y E. Seidman (Eds.), Hand-book of Community Psychology (pp. 43-63). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
Data source: Dialnet