Eficacia del programa Prev@cib 2.0 en cyberbullying, conductas de ayuda y percepción de ayuda del profesor

  1. Ortega-Barón, Jessica 1
  2. Buelga, Sofía 2
  3. Cava, María Jesús 2
  4. Iranzo, Begoña 3
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  3. 3 Universidad Internacional de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Internacional de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00gjj5n39

Zeitschrift:
Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

ISSN: 1696-2095

Datum der Publikation: 2022

Ausgabe: 20

Nummer: 57

Seiten: 427-448

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.25115/EJREP.V20I57.6684 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Introducción.  El incremento y preocupación que suscita el cyberbullying en la comunidad educativa evidencia la necesidad de programas basados en evidencia que permitan prevenir e intervenir este tipo de violencia. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la eficacia del programa Prev@cib 2.0 en la reducción del cyberbullying, y el fomento de las conductas de ayuda y la percepción de ayuda por parte del profesor. Método.  Se utilizó un diseño pre-post-test de medidas repetidas con grupo control y grupo de intervención, al que se le administró el programa Prev@cib durante 4 meses. Participaron en el estudio 580 adolescentes de entre 12 y 17 años (M =13.52, DT =1.27). Resultados. Los resultados mostraron una disminución significativa en cibervictimización y ciberagresión, y un aumento en las conductas de ayuda y percepción de ayuda del profesor después del programa en el grupo de intervención, en comparación con el grupo de control. Discusión y conclusiones. Estos resultados demuestran la eficacia del programa Prev@cib 2.0 para prevenir el acoso cibernético en la adolescencia. Además, se evidencia la importancia de la implicación de toda la comunidad educativa para prevenir esta problemática.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., Yilmaz, N. y Memme-dov, C. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents. CyberPsychology y Behav-ior, 11(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016
  • Barlińska, J., Szuster, A. y Winiewski, M. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander be-havior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 799. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799
  • Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A. y De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Comput-ers in Human Behavior, 31, 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
  • Brochado, S., Soares, S. y Fraga, S. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying preva-lence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, y Abuse, 18(5), 523-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016641668
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1981). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA.
  • Buelga, S., Iranzo, B., Cava, M.-J. y Torralba, E. (2015). Psychological profile of adolescent cyberbullying aggressors. Revista de Psicología Social, 30(2), 382-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1016754
  • Buelga, S., Ortega-Barón, J. y Torralba, E. (2016, octubre 20). Psychometric propierties of re-vised scales of cyberbullying (CybVic_R, CybAG_R). II Congreso Internacional de la So-ciedad Científica Española de Psicología Social, Elche, Spain.
  • Buelga, S., Postigo, J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Cava, M.-J. y Ortega-Barón, J. (2020). Cyberbullying among Adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the CYB-AGS Cyber-Aggressor Scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093090
  • Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S. y Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavior-al correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431602239132
  • Cava, M. J. y Musitu, G. (2002). La conviencia en la escuela. Phepfulós: Ibérica.
  • Chaux, E., Velásquez, A. M. Schultze-Krumbholz, A. y Scheithauer, H. (2016). Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program media heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying: Effects of Media Heroes on traditional bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21637
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. y Fernández-Antelo, I. (2020). Connectivity as a mediating mechanism in the cybervictimization process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124567
  • Del Rey, R., Casas, J. A. y Ortega, R. (2016). Impact of the ConRed program on different cyberbulling roles: Impact of the ConRed Program. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21608
  • Del Rey, R., Ortega-Ruiz, R. y Casas, J. (2019). Asegúrate: An intervention program against cyberbullying based on teachers’ commitment and on design of its instructional materi-als. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030434
  • DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Deboutte, G., Herrewijn, L., Malliet, S., Pabian, S., Van Broeckhoven, F., De Troyer, O., Deglorie, G., Van Hoecke, S., Samyn, K. y De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2018). The efficacy of the Friendly Attac serious digital game to promote prosocial bystander behavior in cyberbullying among young adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 336-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.011
  • Dilmaç, B., Yurt, E., Aydın, M. y Kaşarcı, İ. (2016). Predictive relationship between humane values of adolescents cyberbullying and cyberbullying sensibility. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.38.14123
  • Estrada-Esparza, O. N., Zárate-Conde, G. D. y Izquierdo-Campos, I. (2016). Género, violencia y el discurso del (cyber) bullying en el nivel de educación media superior. Opción, 32(13), 954-978. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=31048483045
  • Fernández-Ballesteros, R. y Sierra, B. (1989). Escalas de clima social FES, WES, CIES y CES. TEA Ediciones.
  • Flisher, A. J., Evans, J., Muller, M. y Lombard, C. (2004). Brief report: Test–retest reliability of self-reported adolescent risk behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 27(2), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2001.10.001
  • Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L. y Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying inter-vention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002
  • Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: Una revisión. Interna-tional Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 233-254. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/560/56019292003.pdf
  • Garaigordobil, M. y Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2014). Cyberprogram 2.0. Un programa de inter-vención para prevenir y reducir el cyberbulling. Ediciones Pirámide.
  • García-Maldonado, G., Martínez-Salazar, G. J., Saldívar-González, A., Sánchez-Nuncio, R., Martínez-Perales, G. M. y Barrientos-Gómez, M. del C. (2011). Factores de riesgo y con-secuencias del cyberbullying en un grupo de adolescentes. Asociación con bullying tra-dicional. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México, 69(6), 463-474. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/bmhim/hi-2012/hi126g.pdf
  • Giménez Gualdo, A. M., Luengo Latorre, J. A. y Bartrina, M. J. (2017). ¿ Qué hacen los meno-res en Internet? Usos de las TIC, estrategias de supervisión parental y exposición a ries-gos. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.43.16123
  • González Calatayud, V., Prendes Espinosa, M. P. y López Pina, J. A. (2016). La percepción so-bre el ciberacoso del profesorado de secundaria de la Región de Murcia. Innoeduca. In-ternational Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 2(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.20548/innoeduca.2016.v2i2.1974
  • González-Cabrera, J., Machimbarrena, J. M., Fernández-González, L., Prieto-Fidalgo, Á., Verga-ra-Moragues, E. y Calvete, E. (2019). Health-Related Quality of Life and Cumulative Psychosocial Risks in Adolescents. Youth y Society, 0044118X1987946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19879461
  • Hellison, D. y Walsh, D. (2002). Responsibility-based youth programs evaluation: Investigating the investigations. Quest, 54(4), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2002.10491780
  • Hinduja, S. y Patchin, J. W. (2014). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press.
  • Iranzo, B., Buelga, S., Cava, M.-J. y Ortega-Barón, J. (2019). Cyberbullying, psychosocial ad-justment, and suicidal ideation in adolescence. Psychosocial Intervention, 28(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2019a5
  • Kowalski, R. M. y Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13-S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018
  • Li, Q. (2009). Cyberbullying in schools: An examination of preservice teachers’ perception. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2DK5G
  • Lo Cricchio, M. G., García-Poole, C., Brinke, L. W., Bianchi, D. y Menesini, E. (2021). Moral disengagement and cyberbullying involvement: A systematic review. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 271-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1782186
  • Moos, R., Moos, S. y Trickett, E. (1984). FES, WES y CES. Escalas de clima social. TEA Edi-ciones.
  • Navarro, R., Yubero, S. y Larrañaga, E. (2015). Psychosocial Risk Factors for Involvement in Bullying Behaviors: Empirical Comparison Between Cyberbullying and Social Bullying Victims and Bullies. School Mental Health, 7(4), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-015-9157-9
  • Ortega-Barón, J., Buelga, S., Ayllón, E., Martínez-Ferrer, B. y Cava, M.-J. (2019). Effects of Intervention Program Prev@cib on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(4), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040527
  • Ortega-Barón, J., Buelga-Vasquez, S. y Cava-Caballero, M. J. (2016). The influence of school climate and family climate among adolescents victims of cyberbullying. Comunicar, 24(46), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.3916/C46-2016-06
  • Özgür, H. (2020). A systematic review on cyberbullying interventions and preventions. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i1.3373
  • Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Grotpeter, J. K., Ingram, K., Michaelson, L., Spinney, E., Valido, A., Sheikh, A. E., Torgal, C. y Robinson, L. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Pre-vention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01259-y
  • Ševčíková, A., Macháčková, H., Wright, M. F., Dědková, L. y Černá, A. (2015). Social support seeking in relation to parental attachment and peer relationships among victims of cyber-bullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 25(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2015.1
  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. y Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbully-ing: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
  • Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., Ristkari, T. y Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbully-ing among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
  • Stauffer, S., Heath, M. A., Coyne, S. M. y Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers' perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 352-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21603
  • Thompson, R. E. y Smith, P. K. (2011). The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. (Research Brief DFE-RR098.).
  • Torgal, C., Espelage, D. L., Polanin, J. R., Ingram, K. M., Robinson, L. E., El Sheikh, A. J. y Valido, A. (2021). A meta-analysis of school-based cyberbullying prevention programs’ impact on cyber-bystander behavior. School Psychology Review, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1913037
  • Weinfurt, K. P. (1995). Multivariate analysis of variance. En Reading and understanding multi-variate statistics (pp. 245-276). American Psychological Association.
  • Williford, A., Elledge, L. C., Boulton, A. J., DePaolis, K. J., Little, T. D. y Salmivalli, C. (2013). Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization fre-quency among Finnish youth. Journal of Clinical Child y Adolescent Psychology, 42(6), 820-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.787623
  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment Theory. En J. Rappaport y E. Seidman (Eds.), Hand-book of Community Psychology (pp. 43-63). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2