Universidades españolas en la prensa extranjera. Análisis de su cobertura periodística

  1. Rafael Repiso 1
  2. María-Ángeles Chaparro-Domínguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

Journal:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Year of publication: 2018

Issue Title: Información personal y datos masivos

Volume: 27

Issue: 1

Pages: 86-94

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2018.ENE.08 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: El profesional de la información

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The presence of Spanish universities in the foreign press is analyzed. We developed a quantitative analysis of the texts published in the international press, indexed in the ProQuest® News & Newspapers database, in which appear some of the 81 universities of Spain. We analyze 37,080 texts published in 1,119 international newspapers from 80 countries. The main results show how United States of America and Mexico are the countries where Spanish universities have a greater presence in foreign press. In addition, it is observed that there is a strong correlation between the number of news and the first-class scientific production developed in the universities.

Bibliographic References

  • Aspara, Jaakko; Aula, Hanna-Mari; Tienari, Janne; Tikkanen, Henrikki (2014). “Struggles in organizational attempts to adopt new branding logics: The case of a marketizing university”. Consumption markets & culture, v. 17, n. 6, pp. 522-552. https://goo.gl/NGPUXg http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2013.876347
  • Castillo-Esparcia, Antonio; Almansa-Martínez, Ana (2004). “Estudio sobre la estructura y el funcionamiento de los gabinetes de comunicación en España”. Anagramas. Rumbos y sentidos de la comunicación, v. 2, n. 4, pp. 47-62. http://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/anagramas/article/ view/1252/1184
  • Docampo, Domingo (2013). “Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities results”. Scientometrics, v. 94, n. 2, pp. 567-587. https://goo.gl/6iuksp https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0801-y
  • Fahy, Declan; Nisbet, Matthew C. (2011). “The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices”. Journalism, v. 12, n. 7, pp. 778-793. https://goo.gl/3JoihZ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412697
  • Fortunato, John A. (2008). “Restoring a reputation: The Duke University lacrosse scandal”. Public relations review, v. 34, pp. 116-123. https://goo.gl/swJkZF https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.03.006
  • González-Pedraz, Cristina; Pérez-Rodríguez, Ana-Victoria; Campos-Domínguez, Eva; Quintanilla-Fisac, Miguel-Ángel (2017). “Análisis comparativo de la presencia de las universidades españolas en prensa digital nacional y local”. Revista latina de comunicación social, n. 72, pp. 861-882. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1197
  • González-Riaño, María-Guadalupe; Repiso, Rafael; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio (2014). “Repercusión de los rankings universitarios en la prensa española”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 37, n. 3, e055. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.3.1128
  • Guallar, Javier; Abadal, Ernest (2009). “Evaluación de hemerotecas de prensa digital: indicadores y ejemplos de buenas prácticas”. El profesional de la informacion, v. 18, n. 3, pp. 255-269. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.may.02
  • Hearn, Alison (2010). “Through the looking glass: The promotional university 2.0”. En: Aronczyk, Melissa; Powers, Dewon (eds.). Blowing up the brand: Critical perspectives on promotional culture, pp. 197-219. New York: Peter Lang. ISBN: 978 1 43 310 867 9 https://goo.gl/12f4dF
  • Herrero-Solana, Víctor; Arboledas, Luis; Legerén-Álvarez, Elisa (2014). “Universidades y Google News: visibilidad internacional a través de los medios de comunicación online”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 37, n. 3, e052. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.3.1130
  • Igartua-Perosanz, Juan-José (2006). Métodos cuantitativos de investigación en comunicación. Barcelona: Bosch. ISBN: 84 9790 271 8
  • Kim, Sei-Hill; Carvalho, John P.; Cooksey, Christy E. (2007). “Exploring the effects of negative publicity: News coverage and public perceptions of a university”. Public relations review, v. 33, n. 2, pp. 233-235. https://goo.gl/btZoGZ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.018
  • Kohring, Matthias; Marcinkowski, Frank; Lindner, Christian; Karis, Sarah (2013). “Media orientation of German university decision makers and the executive influence of public relations”. Public relations review, v. 39, n. 3, pp. 171-177. https://goo.gl/TJ9r2g http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.01.002
  • Melewar, T. C.; Akel, Sibel (2005). “The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector”. Corporate communications: An international journal, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510578196
  • Münch, Richard (2010). “The monopoly mechanism in science. On the shoulders of Robert K. Merton”. Berliner journal für soziologie, v. 20, pp. 341-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11609-010-0132-x
  • Pérez, Francisco; Aldás, Joaquín; Aragón, Rodrigo; Zaera, Irene (2017). U-Ranking 2017: Indicadores sintéticos de las universidades españolas. Fundación BBVA e IVIE. http://dx.medra.org/10.12842/RANKINGS_SP_ISSUE_2017
  • Priem, Jason; Hemminger, Bradley M. (2010). “Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web”. First Monday, v. 15, n. 7. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570
  • Repiso, Rafael; Merino-Arribas, Adoración; Chaparro-Domínguez, María-Ángeles (2016). “Agrupación de las universidades españolas en la prensa impresa nacional”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 39, n. 2, e131. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.2.1292
  • Rojo-Abuín, José-Manuel (2007). Regresión lineal múltiple. Instituto de Economía y Geografía del CSIC. http://humanidades.cchs.csic.es/cchs/web_UAE/tutoriales/ PDF/Regresion_lineal_multiple_3.pdf
  • Rowe, David (2005). “Working knowledge encounters: Academics, journalists and the conditions of cultural labour”. Social semiotics, v. 15, n. 3, pp. 269-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330500310046
  • Rowe, David; Brass, Kylie (2008). “The uses of academic knowledge: The university in the media”. Media, culture & society, v. 30, n. 5, pp. 677-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443708094015
  • Schäfer, Mike S. (2011). “Sources, characteristics and effects of mass media communication on science: A review of the literature, current trends and areas for future research”. Sociology compass, v. 5, n. 6, pp. 399-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x
  • Simancas-González, Esther; García-López, Marcial (2017). “Gestión de la comunicación en las universidades públicas españolas”. El profesional de la información, v. 26, n. 4, pp. 735-744. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.17
  • Sultan, Parves; Wong, Ho-Yin (2013). “Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: A qualitative research approach”. Quality assurance in education, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293070
  • Wæraas, Arild; Solbakk, Marianne N. (2009). “Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding”. Higher education, v. 57, pp. 449-462. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2384881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9155-z
  • Weingart, Peter; Engels, Anita; Pansegrau, Petra (2000). “Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media”. Public understanding of science, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 261-283. https://goo.gl/4AF6TA http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
Data source: Dialnet