Un análisis bibliométrico de la producción académica española en la categoría de Trabajo Social del Journal Citation Report

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2009). H-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273-289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
• Beddoe, L. (2011). Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 557-575.
• Callon, M., Courtial, J. y Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research - The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155-205.
• Callon, M., Courtial, J., Turner, W. y Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22, 191-235.
• Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2011a). An approach for detection, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 146-166. doi:10.106/j.joi2010.10.002.
• Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2012b). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1609-1630. doi:10.1002/asi.22688.
• Coulter, N., Monarch, I. y Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1206-1223
• Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 417-479.
• Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569-16572.
• Hodge, D. R. y Lacasse, J. R. (2011). Ranking disciplinary journals with the google scholar h-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 579-596. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024.
• Hodge, D., Lacasse, J. y Benson, O. (2012). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals: 2000-09. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 765-782. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr093.
• Holden, G., Rosenberg, G. y Barker, K. (2005a). Bibliometrics in Social Work. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
• Martínez, M., Cobo, M., Herrera, M. y Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014a). Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping. Research on Social Work Practice. doi:10.1177/1049731514522101.
• Martínez, M., Herrera, M., López-Gijón, J. y Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014b). H-Classics: Characterizing the Concept of Citation Classics Through H-index. Scientometrics, 98, 1971-1983. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1155-9.
• Noyons, E., Moed, H. y Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 115-131.
• Thyer, B. A. (2010). Twenty years of publishing research on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 5-10. doi:10.1177/1049731509347885.
• van Rann, A. (2004). Measuring Science. Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues. En: H. Moed, W. Glänzel y U. Schmoch, Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.