Un análisis bibliométrico de la producción académica española en la categoría de Trabajo Social del Journal Citation Report

  1. Martínez Sánchez, María Angeles
  2. Díaz Herrera, Miguel
  3. Lima Fernández, Ana I.
  4. Herrera Gómez, Manuel
  5. Herrera Viedma, Enrique
Revue:
Cuadernos de trabajo social

ISSN: 0214-0314 1988-8295

Année de publication: 2014

Volumen: 27

Número: 2

Pages: 429-438

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/REV_CUTS.2014.V27.N2.44662 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Cuadernos de trabajo social

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Références bibliographiques

  • Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2009). H-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273-289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
  • Beddoe, L. (2011). Investing in the future: Social workers talk about research. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 557-575.
  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. y Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research - The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155-205.
  • Callon, M., Courtial, J., Turner, W. y Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22, 191-235.
  • Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2011a). An approach for detection, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 146-166. doi:10.106/j.joi2010.10.002.
  • Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E. y Herrera, F. (2012b). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1609-1630. doi:10.1002/asi.22688.
  • Coulter, N., Monarch, I. y Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1206-1223
  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 417-479.
  • Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individuals scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569-16572.
  • Hodge, D. R. y Lacasse, J. R. (2011). Ranking disciplinary journals with the google scholar h-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions. Journal of Social Work Education, 47(3), 579-596. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024.
  • Hodge, D., Lacasse, J. y Benson, O. (2012). Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals: 2000-09. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 765-782. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr093.
  • Holden, G., Rosenberg, G. y Barker, K. (2005a). Bibliometrics in Social Work. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
  • Martínez, M., Cobo, M., Herrera, M. y Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014a). Analyzing the Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping. Research on Social Work Practice. doi:10.1177/1049731514522101.
  • Martínez, M., Herrera, M., López-Gijón, J. y Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014b). H-Classics: Characterizing the Concept of Citation Classics Through H-index. Scientometrics, 98, 1971-1983. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1155-9.
  • Noyons, E., Moed, H. y Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 115-131.
  • Thyer, B. A. (2010). Twenty years of publishing research on social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 5-10. doi:10.1177/1049731509347885.
  • van Rann, A. (2004). Measuring Science. Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues. En: H. Moed, W. Glänzel y U. Schmoch, Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.