Universidad de Granada-ko ikertzaileekin lankidetzan egindako argitalpenak (11)

2021

  1. Bibliometric Reports for Institutions: Best Practices in a Responsible Metrics Scenario

    Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, Vol. 6

2016

  1. Tracking the performance of an R&D programme in the biomedical sciences

    Research Evaluation, Vol. 25, Núm. 3, pp. 339-346

2014

  1. Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index

    Scientometrics, Vol. 98, Núm. 3, pp. 2113-2127

2013

  1. ANALYZING THE CITATION CHARACTERISTICS OF BOOKS: EDITED BOOKS, BOOK SERIES AND TYPES OF PUBLISHERS IN THE BOOK CITATION INDEX

    14TH INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS CONFERENCE (ISSI)

  2. Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and types of publishers in the book citation index

    Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

  3. Google Scholar e índice h en biomedicina: La popularización de la evaluación bibliométrica

    Medicina Intensiva

  4. Most borrowed is most cited? Library loan statistics as a proxy for monograph selection in citation indexes (rip)

    Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

  5. Ranking journals: Could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and Scimago journal rank?

    Learned Publishing, Vol. 26, Núm. 2, pp. 101-114

  6. Reviewers' Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?

    PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, Núm. 6

2012

  1. Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals

    El profesional de la información, Vol. 21, Núm. 4, pp. 419-427

2011

  1. State of the library and information science blogosphere after social networks boom: A metric approach

    Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 33, Núm. 2, pp. 168-174