Personality traits, risky riding behaviors and crash-related outcomes findings from 5,778 cyclists in 17 countries

  1. Useche, Sergio A. 13
  2. Alonso, Francisco 12
  3. Boykob, Aleksey
  4. Buyvol, Polina
  5. Castafleda, Isaac
  6. Cendales, Boris
  7. Cervantes, Arturo
  8. Echiburu, Tomas
  9. Faus, Mireia 13
  10. Feitosa, Zuleide
  11. Gnap, Jozef
  12. lbrabim, Mohd K.
  13. Janstrup, Kira H.
  14. Makarova, Irijna
  15. Mellroy, Rich
  16. Mikusova, Miroslava
  17. Meller, Mette
  18. Ngueuteu-Fouaka, Sylvain G.
  19. O'Hern, Steve
  20. Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio
  21. Sbubenkova, Ksenia
  22. Siebert, Felix
  23. Soto, Jose
  24. Stephens, Amanda N.
  25. Wang, Yonggang
  26. Willberg, Ellias
  27. Wintersberger, Phillip
  28. Zeuwts, Linus
  29. Zulkipli, Zadir H.
  30. Montoro, Luis 4
  31. Mostrar todos los/as autores/as +
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 (Departament de Psicologia Bàsica)
  3. 3 Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Trànsit i Seguretat Viària (INTRAS)
  4. 4 Universitat de València (Departament de Psicologia Bàsica)
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Actas:
Contributions to the 10th International Cycling Safety Conference 2022 (ICSC2022)

Editorial: Technische Universität Dresden

Año de publicación: 2022

Páginas: 134-137

Congreso: International Cycling Safety Conference (ICSC). Dresden, 08.-10. November 2022

Tipo: Aportación congreso

DOI: 10.25368/2022.460 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

The last few years have brought about a series of substantial changes for mobility on two wheels, especially if the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is considered as a relevant fact for transportation dynamics. Social distancing recommendations have promoted the use of individual transportation systems instead of massive transportations means. Consequently, riding a bike for urban trips has become increasingly prevalent in many countries. Besides an opportunity to make urban mobility more active and sustainable, this panorama poses the challenge to prevent that, along with its growing use, bicycle crashes ---and their consequences-might continue to increase. In this regard, recent studies have emphasized the role of individual differences and personality-related factors as potential issues influencing both cycling behaviors and traffic crashes suffered while riding.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • R. Buehler, J. Pucher, "COVID-19 Impacts on Cycling, 2019-2020". Transport Reviews 41 (2021), pp. 1-8.
  • K. Gkiotsalitis, O. Cats, "Public transport planning adaption under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: literature review of research needs and directions". Transport Reviews 41 (2021), pp. 374-392.
  • S. Heydari, G. Konstantinoudis, A. W. Behsoodi, "Effect of the COVTD-19 pandemic on bike- sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London". PLoS ONE 16, (2021), pp. e0260969
  • J. Lee, F. Baig, A. Pervez, "Tmpacts of COVTD-19 on individuals' mobility behavior in Pakistan based on self-reported responses". Journal of Transport & Health 22 (2021), pp.101228.
  • J. Teixeira, C. Silva, F. M. Sá, "The motivations for using bike sharing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Lisbon". Transportation research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 82 (2021), pp. 378-399.
  • Y. Zheng, Y. Ma, J. Cheng, "Personality and Behavioral Predictors of Cyclist Involvement in Crash-Related Conditions". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, (2019), pp. 4881.
  • S. O'Hern, A. N. Stephens, K. L. Young, S. Koppel, "Personality traits as predictors of cyclist behaviour". Accident Analysis & Prevention 145, (2020), pp. 105704.
  • S. A. Useche, L. Montoro, J. M. Tomas, B. Cendales, "Validation of the Cycling Behavior Questionnaire: A tool for measuring cyclists' road behaviors". Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 58 (2018), pp. 1021-1030.
  • F. R. Lang, D. John, O. Lüdtke, J. Schupp, G. G. Wagner, "Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing". Behavior Research Methods 43 (2011), pp. 548-67.