Gamificación del aula en la enseñanza superior onlineel uso de Kahoot

  1. Marta Magadán-Díaz 1
  2. Jesús I. Rivas-García 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, España.
Revista:
Campus Virtuales

ISSN: 2255-1514

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 11

Número: 1

Páginas: 137-152

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.54988/CV.2022.1.978 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Campus Virtuales

Resumen

This research studies the perceptions that university students of the master’s degree in Teacher Training of ESO and Baccalaureate, FP, and Language Teaching at Nebrija University have in using Kahoot in the virtual classroom. It is also about evaluating which variables previously identified in the interviews are those experienced by most of the students who play with Kahoot and, subsequently, confirming whether the quantitative analysis of the survey confirms the results obtained in the qualitative phase of the students' interviews. It is concluded that the students' perception, concerning the use of Kahoot, is very positive. Kahoot has a positive impact on motivation, commitment, and dynamism in the virtual classroom. Finally, the quantitative analysis confirms the qualitative one.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Åkerblad, L.; Seppänen-Järvelä, R.; Haapakoski, K. (2021). Integrative strategies in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 152-170. doi:10.1177/1558689820957125.
  • Aljaloud, A.; Gromik, N.; Billingsley, W.; Kwan, P. (2015). Research trends in student response systems: A literature review. International Journal of Learning Technology (IJLT), 10(4), 313. doi:10.1504/IJLT.2015.074073.
  • Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to perform a mixed methods study. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 137-151. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1406214.
  • Almusharraf, N. (2021). Incorporation of a game-based approach into the EFL online classrooms: Students’ perceptions. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1969953.
  • Awwal, N.; Alom, M.; Care, E. (2015). Game design for learning to solve problems in a collaborative environment. In European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited.
  • Balta, N.; Perera, V. H.; Hervás, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 837-850. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9638-6.
  • Bicen, H.; Kocakoyun, S. (2018). Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2), 72-93.
  • Braun, V.; Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205.
  • Cameron, K. E.; Bizo, L. A. (2019). Use of the game-based learning platform KAHOOT! To facilitate learner engagement in animal science students. Research in Learning Technology, 27, 1-14. doi:10.25304/rlt.v27.2225.
  • Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, 1, 39-64. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511840975.004.
  • Chiang, H.-H. (2020). Kahoot! In an EFL reading class. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 33-44. doi:10.17507/jltr.1101.05.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  • Dakka, S. M. (2015). Using Socrative to enhance in-class student engagement and collaboration. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4(3), 13-19. doi:10.5121/ijite.2015.4302.
  • Dervan, P. (2014). Increasing in-class student engagement using Socrative (an online student response system). AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 6(3), 1801-1813.
  • Domínguez, A.; Saenz de Navarrete, J.; de Marcos, L.; Fernández, L.; Pagés, C.; Martínez, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392.
  • Doumanis, I.; Economou, D.; Sim, G. R.; Porter, S. (2019). The impact of multimodal collaborative virtual environments on learning: A gamified online debate. Computers & Education, 130, 121-138. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.017.
  • Faya, F.; Martín-Macho, A. (2019). Socrative in higher education: Game vs. Other uses. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(3), 49. doi:10.3390/mti3030049.
  • Gebbels, M. (2018). Re-engineering challenging and abstract topics using Kahoot!, a student response system. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 1-2. doi:10.21100/compass.v11i2.844.
  • Gideon, L. (2012). Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. Springer.
  • Gokbulut, B. (2020). The effect of Mentimeter and Kahoot applications on university students’e-learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 12(2), 107-116.
  • Göksün, D. O.; Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015.
  • Grinias, J. P. (2017). Making a game out of it: Using web-based competitive quizzes for quantitative analysis content review. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(9), 1363-1366. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00311.
  • Groves, R. M.; Fowler Jr., F. J.; Couper, M. P.; Lepkowski, J. M.; Singer, E.; Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology (2.a ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hernández, J. P.; Belmonte, M. L. (2020). Assessment of the Use of Kahoot! En Face-to-Face and Virtual Higher Education. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 21, 1-13. doi:10.14201/eks.22910.
  • Holbrey, C. E. (2020). Kahoot! Using a game-based approach to blended learning to support effective learning environments and student engagement in traditional lecture theatres. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 191-202. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737568.
  • Hung, H.-T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: Bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983-995. doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090.
  • Iaremenko, N. V. (2017). Enhancing English language learners’ motivation through online games. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 59(3), 126-133. doi:10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1606.
  • Ismail, M. A.-A.; Mohammad, J. A.-M. (2017). Kahoot: A promising tool for formative assessment in medical education. Education in Medicine Journal, 9(2), 19-26. doi:10.21315/eimj2017.9.2.2.
  • Johns, K. (2015). Engaging and Assessing Students with Technology: A Review of Kahoot!. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(4), 89-91.
  • Kalu, F. A.; Bwalya, J. C. (2017). What makes qualitative research good research? An exploratory analysis of critical elements. International Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 43-56. doi:10.5296/ijssr.v5i2.10711.
  • Kapp, K. (2012). The Gamification of learning and instruction. Pfeiffer.
  • Kay, R. H.; LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001.
  • Kocak, O. (2021). A systematic literature review of web-based student response systems: Advantages and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 1-35. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10732-8.
  • Korkmaz, S.; Öz, H. (2021). Using Kahoot to Improve Reading Comprehension of English as a Foreign Language Learners. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 1138-1150.
  • Licorish, S. A.; Owen, H. E.; Daniel, B.; George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!‘s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(9), 1-23. doi:10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8.
  • Llerena, E. G.; Rodríguez, C. P. (2017). Kahoot! A digital tool for learning vocabulary in a language classroom. Revista Publicando, 4(12), 441-449.
  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333-369. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2.
  • Malone, T. W.; Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, learning, and instruction, 3, 223-253.
  • McLaughlin, T.; Yan, Z. (2017). Diverse delivery methods and strong psychological benefits: A review of online formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(6), 562-574. doi:10.1111/jcal.12200.
  • Méndez, D.; Slisko, J. (2013). Software Socrative and smartphones as tools for implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: An initial feasibility study with prospective teachers. European Journal of Physics Education, 42(2), 17-24.
  • Morillas, C.; Muñoz, M.; Sánchez, J. (2016). Can Gamification improve the benefits of student response Systems in Learning? An experimental study. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(3), 429-438. doi:10.1109/TETC.2015.2497459.
  • Müller, B. C.; Reise, C.; Seliger, G. (2015). Gamification in Factory Management Education – A Case Study with Lego Mindstorms. Procedia CIRP, 26, 121-126. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.056.
  • Nielsen, K. L.; Hansen, G.; Stav, J. B. (2013). Teaching with student response systems (SRS): Teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students’ experience of using SRS. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18989.
  • Plump, C. M.; LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! In the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for eLearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151-158. doi:10.1177/2379298116689783.
  • Pratolo, B. W.; Lofti, T. M. (2021). Students’ perceptions toward the use of Kahoot! Online game for learning English. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 8(1), 276-284.
  • Richardson, A. M.; Dunn, P. K.; McDonald, C.; Oprescu, F. (2015). CRiSP: An instrument for assessing student perceptions of classroom response systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 432-447. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9528-2.
  • Robson, K.; Plangger, K.; Kietzmann, J. H.; McCarthy, I.; Pitt, L. (2015). Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Business Horizons, 58(4), 411-420. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.006.
  • Rodríguez, L. (2017). Smartphones y aprendizaje: El uso de Kahoot en el aula universitaria. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 8(1), 181-190. doi:10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.1.13.
  • Ryan, R. M.; Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
  • Sahak, A. A. M.; Rahman, A. W. A.; Ismail, M. R. F. H. R.; Rohiat, M. A.; Yazid, N. D.; Aminudin, S. N.; Zakariah, S. H. (2021). Students’ Acceptance towards Kahoot Application in Mastering Culinary Terminology. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 27(1), 1-6. doi:10.21831/jptk.v27i1.38391.
  • Saleem, A.; Noori, N.; Ozdamli, F. (2021). Gamification applications in E-learning: A literature review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-21. doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x.
  • Schoonenboom, J.; Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107-131. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1.
  • Sprague, A. (2019). Using Kahoot jumble to teach paragraphing in the writing classroom. The Wisconsin English Journal, 61(1).
  • Tóth, Á.; Lógó, P.; Lógó, E. (2019). The the effect of the Kahoot quiz on the Student’s results in the exam. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 27(2), 173-179. doi:10.3311/PPso.12464.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004.
  • Wang, A. I.; Lieberoth, A. (2016). The effect of points and audio on concentration, engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation, and classroom dynamics using Kahoot! In proceedings from the 10th European conference on games based learning. 10th European conference on games based learning, Reading, UK.
  • Wang, A. I.; Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! For learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818.
  • Wentao, C.; Jinyu, Z.; Zhonggen, Y. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of clicker use in education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 13(1), 61-71. doi:10.4018/IJICTE.2017010106.
  • Wolff, G. J. (2016). Quizlet live: The classroom game now taking the world by storm. The Language Teacher, 40(6), 25-27.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet