A distinctness approach to clitic combinations in Romance

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• -Abney, Steven. 1986. Functional elements and licensing. In Paper presented at IXth GLOW, Gerona,Spain.
• -Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology disertation.
• -Ackema, Peter. 2001. On the relation between V-to-I and the structure of the inflectional paradigm.Linguistic Review 18(3). 233–264.
• -Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language &Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–483.
• -Arnal, María Luisa. 1998. El habla de la Baja Ribagorza occidental. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.
• -Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2007. The subject-in-situ generalization revisited. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language?: Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 31–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• -Belletti, Adriana. 2005. Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17. 1–35.
• -Bernstein, Judy. 2008. English th-forms. In Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination, 213–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• -Bittner, Maria & Ken Hale. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic inquiry 27. 1–68.
• -Bleam, Tonia. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the syntax of clitic doubling. Delaware: University of Delaware Dissertation.
• -Boeckx, Cedric & Txuss Martin. 2013. El clític datiu és més que un clític. Lleida: Pagès.
• -Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.
• -Bonet, Eulàlia. 1995. Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13. 607–647.
• -Bonet, Eulàlia. 2008. The person case constraint and repair strategies. In Roberta d’Alessandro, Susann Fischer & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargaron (eds.), Agreement restrictions, 103–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• -Bonet, Eulàlia & Maria-Rosa Lloret. 2002. OCP effects in Catalan cliticization. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1. 19–39.
• -Caha, Pavel. 2009. The nanosyntax of case. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.
• -Campos, Héctor. 1986. Indefinite object drop. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 354–359.
• -Cardinaletti, Anna. 2008. On different types of clitic clusters. In Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The Bantu-Romance connection, 41–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• -Cardinaletti, Anna. 2010. Morphologically complex clitic pronouns and spurious se once again. In Vicenç Torrens, Linda Escobar & Anna Gavarró & Juncar Gutiérrez (eds.), Movement and clitics: Adult and child grammar, 238–259. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• -Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• -Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels &Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. Current Studies in Linguistics Series 45. 133–166.
• -Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49.
• -Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• -Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Restructuring and functional structure. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 132–191. Oxford: OUP.
• -Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
• -Cuervo, María Cristina. 2013. Spanish clitic clusters: Three of a perfect pair. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2. 191–220.
• -Donati, Caterina. 2006. On wh-head movement. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (Current Studies in Linguistics 42), 21–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic inquiry 33(3). 409–442.
• -Fernández Ordóñez, Inés. 1999. Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (coord.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1317–1398. Madrid: Espasa.
• -Franco, Jon & Alazne Landa. 1991. The syntax and semantics of null objects in Basque Spanish. In Katharine Hunt, Thomas A. Perry & Vida Samiian (eds.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics, WECOL, vol. 91, 117–128. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics at California State University, Fresno.
• -Franco, Jon & Alazne Landa. 1992. Objetos nulos en el castellano del País Vasco: dos estatus para dos interpretaciones. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 26(3). 777–792.
• -Gallego, Ángel J. 2016. A phase-theoretic approach to cliticization in Romance. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 9(1). 67–94.
• -Gallego, Ángel J. & Juan Uriagareka. 2016. Condiciones de ensamble en las combinaciones de clíticos. En Ángel J. Gallego, Yolanda Rodríguez & Javier Fernández (eds.), Relaciones sintácticas: homenaje a Josep M. Brucart y M. Lluïsa Hernanz, 663–680. Barcelona: UAB.
• -Giralt, Javier. 1998. Aspectos gramaticales de las hablas de La Litera (Huesca). Zaragoza:Institución Fernando el Católico.
• -Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3). 482–526.
• -Harris, James W. 1992. The form classes of Spanish substantives. In Geert Booij, & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 65–88. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
• -Harris, Alice. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• -Heggie, Lorie & Francisco Ordóñez (eds). 2005. Clitic and affix combinations. Theoretical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• -Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa & Gemma Rigau. 1984. Auxiliaritat i reestructuració. Els Marges: revista de llengua i literatura 31. 29–51.
• -Hiraiwa, Ken. 2010. The syntactic OCP. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), The proceedings of the 11th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 35–56. Hituzi: Tokyo.
• -Huidobro, Susana. 2009. Datives as “concordial” case: Evidence from Spanish and Galician. Unpublished manucript, Stony Brook University & Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
• -Jeong, Youngmi. 2006. The landscape of applicatives. College Park: University of Maryland disertation.
• -Jeong, Youngmi. 2007. Applicatives: Structures and interpretation from a minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• -Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
• -Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In Ovaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 239–261. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
• -Kayne, Richard S. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic inquiry 22(4). 647–686.
• -Kayne, Richard. 1993. The antisymmetry of syntax. Unpublished manuscript, City University of New York.
• -Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax (No. 25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• -Kayne, Richard. 2002. Pronouns and their antecedents. In Samuel David Epstein (ed.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 133–166. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• -Kramer, Martin. 2012. Underlying representations. Cambridge: CUP.
• -Kuhn, Alwin. 2008. El dialecto altoaragonés. Zaragoza: Xordiga.
• -Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1993. A syntactic view of Romance pronominal sequences. Probus 5(3). 242–270.
• -Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1994. Enclitic clustering: The case of French positive imperatives. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 19. 71–104.
• -Landa, Alazne. 1995. Conditions on null objects in Basque Spanish and their relation to leísmo and clitic doubling. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.
• -Landa, María. 2005. Las combinaciones de clíticos en el cheso. Alazet 17. 113–133.
• -Leonetti, Manuel. 1999. El artículo. In Violeta Demonte & Ignacio Bosque (eds.) Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol 1, 787–890. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
• -Leonetti, Manuel. 2004. Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 75–114.
• -Leu, Tom. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. New York City, NY: NYU dissertation.
• -Longa Víctor, Guillermo Lorenzo & Gemma Rigau. 1996. Expressing modality by recycling clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 5(1). 67–79.
• -Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1980. Remarks on infinitives: A case for a filter. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5(1). 101–152.
• -López, Luis. 2007. Locality and the architecture of syntactic dependencies. London: PalgraveMacMillan.
• -López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambrideg, MA: MIT Press.
• -Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia. 2011. Grammatical categories: Variation in Romance languages, vol. 128. Cambridge: CUP.
• -Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In German Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
• -Martin, Txuss. 2012. Deconstructing Catalan object clitics. New York: New York University Dissertation.
• -Menn, Lise & Brian MacWhinney. 1984. The repeated morph constraint: Toward an explanation. Language 60(3). 519–541.
• -Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic antisymmetry (No. 38). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
• -Nagore, Francho. 1986. El aragonés de Panticosa. Gramática. Huesca: IEA.
• -Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot. 2005. Syntactic haplology. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 685–710. Wiley-Blackwell.
• -Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(2). 273–313.
• -Ordóñez, Francisco. 2002. Some clitic combinations in the syntax of Romance. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1. 201–224.
• -Ordóñez, Francisco. 2012. Clitics in Spanish. In José I. Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rouke (eds.), The handbook of Spanish Linguistics, 423–453. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
• -Ordóñez, Francisco & Francesc Roca. 2014. Differential object marking (DOM) and clitic subspecification in Catalonian Spanish. In Angel Gállego (ed.), The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects. Available at: https://linguistics.stonybrook.edu/people/_bios/_linguistics-faculty/_faculty-files/ordonez/pre-publication.draft_.OUP_.Ordonez-Roca.pdf.
• -Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2007. The object agreement constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2). 315–347.
• -Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013a. Differential object marking, case and agreement.Borealis An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2. 221–239.
• -Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2013b. Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus 25(2). 301–314.
• -Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2018. Number agreement in se constructions. Unpublsihed manuscript, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) and University of Extremadura (UEx).
• -Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2019. The formal properties of non paradigmatic SE. Borealis:An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 8. 55–84.
• -Ortiz de Urbina, Jon. 1989. Parameters in the grammar of Basque: A GB approach to Basque syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
• -Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• -Pescarini, Diego. 2010. Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from clitic clusters. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3). 427–444.
• -Pescarini, Diego. 2015. Le costruzioni con «si». Italiano, dialetti e lingue romanze. Rome: Carocci Editore.
• -Picallo, M. Carme. 1994. A mark of specificity in indefinite nominals. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1). 143–167.
• -Picallo, M. Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio 7(1). 47–66.
• -Planells, Samanta. 2018. La concordancia desdoblada en la IMPse. In Paper presented at Spanish Dialect Meeting, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real.
• -Postal, Paul M. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Binnick (eds.), In Papers from the 5th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 209–239. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
• -Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.
• -Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 49). Cambridge,MA: MIT press.
• -Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering trees, vol. 56. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Richards, Marc & Theresa Biberauer. 2005. Explaining expl. In Marcel den Dikken & Christina
• -Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, 115–153. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
• -Rigau, Gemma. 1978. “Hi” datiu inanimat. Els Marges 12. 99–102
• -Rigau, Gemma. 1982. Inanimate indirect object in Catalan. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 146–150.
• -Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Negation, wh-movement and the null subject parameter. In Luigi Rizzi Issues in Italian syntax, 117–184. Berlin: De Gruyter.
• -Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen SilvaCorvalan (eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics, 391–419. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
• -Roberts, Ían G. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals,vol. 59. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Roca, Francesc. 1992. Object clitics in Spanish and Catalan. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 2. 245–280.
• -Roca, Francesc. 1996. La determinación y la modificación nominal en español. Barcelona:Autonomous University of Barcelona Dissertation.
• -Rodríguez Mondoñedo, Miguel. 2007. The syntax of objects: Agree and differential object marking.Connecticut: University of Connecticut Dissertation.
• -Romero, Juan. 2008. Los dativos en el español. Madrid: Arco Libros.
• -Saura, José Antonio. 1998. Incrementos átonos benasqueses. Alazet 10. 159–180.
• -Siegel, Dorothy C. 1974. Topics in English morphology. Cambride, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.
• -Sistac, Ramon. 1993. El Ribagorçà a l’alta Llitera: els parlars de la vall de la Sosa de Peralta.Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
• -Solà-Pujols, Joan. 1998. Clitics are inflection. Evidence from Catalan. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, 213–226. Girona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Girona. -Sportiche, Dominique. 1997. Subject clitics in French and Romance: Complex inversion and clitic doubling. In Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts (eds.), Studies in comparative syntax, 189–221.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• -Sportiche, Dominique. 1998. Partitions and atoms of clause structure. London: Routledge.
• -Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 391–434.
• -Suñer Margarita & María Yépez. 1988. Null definite objects in Quiteño. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 511–519.
• -Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 245–265.
• -Torrego, Esther. 1988. Operadores en las exclamativas con artículo determinado. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 1. 109–122.
• -Torrego, Esther. 1992.Case and agreement structure. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts thesis.
• -Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects, vol. 34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• -Torrego, Esther. 2002. Arguments for a derivational approach to syntactic relations based on clitics. In Samuel D. Epstein & T.D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 249–268. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• -Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On government. Mansfield, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.
• -Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1). 79–123.
• -Van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1998. Categorial feature magnetism: The endocentricity and distribution of projections. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2(1). 1–48.
• -Walkow, Martin. 2012. Goals, big and small. Cambridge, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
• -Walkow, Martin. 2013. Locating variation in person restrictions. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(28). 247–256
• -Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. The syntax of pronouns: Evidence from Halkomelem Salish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(1). 157–195.
• -Wurmbrand, Susi. 1998. Heads or phrases? Particles in particular. In Richard Wiese & Wolfgang Kehrein (eds.), Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages, 267–296. Tübingen:Max Niemeyer Verlag.
• -Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• -Wurmbrand, Susi. 2004. Two types of restructuring—Lexical vs. functional. Lingua 114(8).991–1014.
• -Yip, Moira. 1998. Identity avoxidance in phonology and morphology. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farell (eds.), Mophology and its relation to phonology and syntax,216–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
• -Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1999. The cl(itic) projection in questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7. 253–277