Eficacia de un programa de prevención multirriesgo en internetSafety.ne

  1. J. Ortega-Barón 1
  2. J.M. Machimbarrena 2
  3. A. Díaz-López 3
  4. V. Caba-Machado 3
  5. B. Tejero 3
  6. J. González-Cabrera 3
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  3. 3 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista de psicodidáctica

ISSN: 1136-1034

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 29

Número: 2

Páginas: 97-106

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.PSICOD.2024.01.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicodidáctica

Resumen

Cada vez existen más programas de prevención e intervención sobre riesgos de internet. Sin embargo, la mayoría de ellos no tienen en cuenta la amplitud de los riesgos existentes tanto en el uso relacional como disfuncional de la tecnología. El principal objetivo de este estudio ha sido confirmar los indicadores de eficacia del programa de prevención multirriesgo de internet (Safety.net). Este programa, que consta de 16 sesiones (1 hora/sesión), promueve competencias generales para un adecuado uso de internet, y previene ocho riesgos: ciberacoso, sexteo, ciberembaucamiento, abuso online en la pareja, uso problemático de internet, nomofobia, trastorno por juego en internet y trastorno de apuestas online. Tiene un diseno˜ instruccional en red para recordar los contenidos ya abordados a medida que avanza el programa. La muestra está formada por 726 adolescentes (54% chicas) entre 11- 14 anos ˜ (M = 12.11, DT = 0.89). Para su evaluación se ha utilizado un diseno˜ de medidas repetidas pre/post-test con un grupo de intervención (n = 450) y un grupo de control (n = 276). El grupo de intervención muestra mejoras significativas en comparación con el grupo de control en cibervictimización entre iguales y en la pareja, solicitación/interacción sexual con adultos, uso problemático de internet y nomofobia. Estos resultados sugieren que el programa Safety.net puede ser eficaz para prevenir el aumento de la mayoría de los riesgos de internet evaluados mediante un número reducido de sesiones. Se trata de una herramienta psicoeducativa potencial para integrar en los planes de acción tutorial.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • [Ajzen, 2011] The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26 (2011), pp. 1113-1127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 | Medline
  • [Amse, 2014] Amse, J. (2014). Evaluation of the effectiveness of the anti-bullying intervention program ‘Survivors!’ [University of Twente]. https://essay.utwente.nl/65998/1/Amse%20Joanne%20-s%201128566%20scriptie.pdf
  • [Anderson y Jiang, 2018] Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center's, (2018)
  • [Andrade et al., 2021] Andrade, B., Guadix, I., Rial, A., y Suárez, F. (2021). Impacto de la tecnología en la adolescencia. Relaciones, riesgos y oportunidades. UNICEF España.
  • [Beranuy et al., 2020] Spanish validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short Form (IGDS9-SF): Prevalence and relationship with online gambling and quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051562
  • [Calvete et al., 2020] Internet-risk classes of adolescents, dispositional mindfulness and health-related quality of life: A mediational model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23 (2020), pp. 533-540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0705 | Medline
  • [Calvete et al., 2020] Validation of a questionnaire to assess abuse in dating relationships in adolescents (CARPA), their reasons and reactions. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 8 (2020), pp. 60-69 http://dx.doi.org/10.21134/rpcna.2021.08.1.8
  • [Caridade et al., 2019] Cyber dating abuse (CDA): Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48 (2019), pp. 152-168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.018
  • [Carrascosa et al., 2019] Reduction of sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and aggressive behaviors in adolescents: Efficacy of the DARSI program. Psicothema, 31 (2019), pp. 121-127 http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.245 | Medline
  • [Cava et al., 2020] Cava, M.-J., Buelga, S., Carrascosa, L., y Ortega-Barón, J. (2020). Relations among romantic myths, offline dating violence victimization and cyber dating violence victimization in adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), Article 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051551
  • [Clark, 2008] Building expertise: Cognitive methods for training and performance improvement. 3rd ed, Pfeiffer, (2008)
  • [Cortazar et al., 2021] Effects of a Brief Preventive Intervention in cyberbullying and grooming in adolescents. Psychosocial Intervention, 30 (2021), pp. 75-84 http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a22
  • [Creswell, 2003] Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, (2003)
  • [Davidson et al., 2009] ThinkUknow Internet safety programme and exploration of young people's Internet safety knowledge. Kingston University, (2009)
  • [Díaz Salabert y Gómez Torres, 2019] Cribado e intervención breve digital en el uso problemático de Internet: Programa piensaTIC. Escritos de Psicología, 12 (2019), pp. 57-68 http://dx.doi.org/10.24310/espsiescpsi.v12i2.9984
  • [Díaz-López et al., 2020] Maladaptive use of ICT in adolescence: Profiles, supervision and technological stress. Comunicar, 28 (2020), pp. 29-38 http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C64-2020-03
  • [Englander y McCoy, 2018] Sexting—prevalence, age, sex, and outcomes. JAMA Pediatrics, 172 (2018), pp. 317-318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5682
  • [Espelage y Hong, 2017] Cyberbullying prevention and intervention efforts: Current knowledge and future directions. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 62 (2017), pp. 374-380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0706743716684793 | Medline
  • [Evans et al., 2013] Cumulative risk and child development. Psychological Bulletin, 139 (2013), pp. 1342-1396 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031808
  • [Fam, 2018] Prevalence of internet gaming disorder in adolescents: A meta-analysis across three decades. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59 (2018), pp. 524-531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12459 | Medline
  • [Gaffney et al., 2019] Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective?. A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45 (2019), pp. 134-153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002
  • [Gámez-Guadix et al., 2015] Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among spanish adults. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12 (2015), pp. 145-154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9
  • [Gámez-Guadix et al., 2018] The Construction and Psychometric Properties of the Questionnaire for Online Sexual Solicitation and Interaction of Minors With Adults. Sexual Abuse, 30 (2018), pp. 975-991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063217724766 | Medline
  • [Gámez-Guadix et al., 2013] Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 25 (2013), pp. 299-306 http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.274 | Medline
  • [Garaigordobil y Martínez-Valderrey, 2014] Effect of Cyberprogram 2.0 on reducing victimization and improving social competence in adolescence. Revista de Psicodidactica, 19 (2014), pp. 289-305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/RevPsicodidact.10239
  • [García et al., 2008] Diseño y análisis de la potencia: N y los intervalos de confianza de las medias. Psicothema, 20 (2008), pp. 933-938 Medline
  • [Giménez Lozano y Morales Rodríguez, 2022] Systematic review: Preventive intervention to curb the youth online gambling problem. Sustainability, 14 (2022), pp. 6402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14116402
  • [González-Cabrera et al., 2022] Loot boxes in Spanish adolescents and young adults: Relationship with internet gaming disorder and online gambling disorder. Computers in Human Behavior, 126 (2022), pp. 107012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107012
  • [González-Cabrera et al., 2019] Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying triangulation questionnaire: A prevalence analysis through seven roles. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60 (2019), pp. 160-168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12518 | Medline
  • [González-Cabrera y Machimbarrena, 2023] Quality of life and its relationship with bullying and cyberbullying: face-to-face and online victimization and aggression among peers. Handboof of Anger, Aggression and Violence: Causes, Pathology and Treatments, pp. 1-18
  • [González-Cabrera et al., 2020] Design and measurement properties of the Online Gambling Disorder Questionnaire (OGD-Q) in Spanish adolescents. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9 (2020), http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010120
  • [González-Cabrera et al., 2021] Health-related quality of life and cumulative psychosocial risks in adolescents. Youth & Society, 53 (2021), pp. 636-653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19879461 | Medline
  • [Hodgetts et al., 2023] Time spent playing video games during periods of isolation has no effect on loneliness or mental health. Behaviour & Information Technolog., (2023), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X. 2023.2272201 | Medline
  • [Horowitz y Garber, 2006] The prevention of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74 (2006), pp. 401-415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.401 | Medline
  • [Hox, 2002] Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 2021] Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2021). Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares. Año 2021. https://www.ine.es/prensa/tich_2021.pdf.
  • [Khosravi et al., 2021] The effectiveness web-based educational program on optimal use of smartphones among students with nomophobia based on self-efficacy theory: The role of the medical librarian. Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, 9 (2021), pp. 246-257 http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/ijhehp.9.3.246
  • [Laconi et al., 2018] Cross-cultural study of problematic Internet use in nine European countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 84 (2018), pp. 430-440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.020
  • [Lai y Kwok, 2015] Examining the rule of thumb of not using multilevel modeling: The “design effect smaller than two” rule. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83 (2015), pp. 423-438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.907229
  • [Lee et al., 2013] Cyber bullying prevention: Intervention in Taiwan. PLoS ONE, 8 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064031
  • [Lenhard y Lenhard, 2022] Lenhard, W., y Lenhard, A. (2022). Computation of effect sizes. Retrieved from: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html.
  • [León-Mejía et al., 2020] Cuestionario de Nomofobia (NMP-Q): Estructura factorial y puntos de corte de la versión española. Adicciones, 33 (2020), pp. 137-148 http://dx.doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1316 | Medline
  • [León-Mejía et al., 2021] A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research. PLOS ONE, 16 (2021), pp. e0250509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250509 | Medline
  • [Machimbarrena et al., 2023] Problem Internet use and Internet gaming disorder: Overlap and relationship with health-related quality of life in adolescents. Adicciones, 35 (2023), pp. 107-118 http://dx.doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.1494
  • [Machimbarrena et al., 2018] Machimbarrena, J. M., Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L., Álvarez-Bardón, A., Álvarez-Fernández, L., y González-Cabrera, J. (2018). Internet risks: An overview of victimization in cyberbullying, cyber dating abuse, sexting, online grooming and problematic Internet use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), Article 2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112471
  • [Merrill, 1987] The new component design theory: Instructional design for courseware authoring. Instructional Science, 16 (1987), pp. 19-34 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00120003
  • [Montiel et al., 2016] Multiple online victimization of Spanish adolescents: Results from a community sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 52 (2016), pp. 123-134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.12.005 | Medline
  • [Montiel et al., 2021] Problematic online gambling among adolescents: A systematic review about prevalence and related measurement issues. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10 (2021), pp. 566-586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00055 | Medline
  • [Observatorio Español de las Drogas y las Adicciones, 2022] Observatorio Español de las Drogas y las Adicciones. (2022). Informe sobre Trastornos Comportamentales. https://pnsd.sanidad.gob.es/profesionales/sistemasInformacion/sistemaInformacion/pdf/2022_Informe_Trastornos_Comportamentales.pdf.
  • [Ortega-Barón et al., 2019] Effects of intervention program Prev@cib on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (2019), pp. 527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040527 | Medline
  • [Ortega-Barón et al., 2021] Safety.Net: A pilot study on a multi-risk Internet prevention program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (2021), http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084249
  • [Ortega-Barón et al., 2023] Solicitation and sexualized interactions of minors with adults: Prevalence, overlap with other forms of cybervictimization, and relationship with quality of life. Psychosocial Intervention, 32 (2023), pp. 155-163 http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/pi2023a15 | Medline
  • [Subrahmanyam y Smahel, 2011] Digital youth. Springer, (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6278-2
  • [WeAreSocial, 2022] WeAreSocial. (2022). Special Report DIGITAL 2022. https://wearesocial.com/es/blog/2022/01/digital-2022.
  • [Weinfurt, 2000] Repeated measures analysis: ANOVA, MANOVA, and HLM. Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics, pp. 317-361
  • [Yeager et al., 2015] Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37 (2015), pp. 36-51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005
  • [Zimmerman, 2000] Empowerment Theory. Handbook of Community Psychology, pp. 43-63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet