La hidropolítica y las relaciones exteriores de China en el complejo hídrico del Himalayalos casos de Nepal e India

  1. Miguel Ángel Medina Abellán 1
  1. 1 Universitat Abat Oliba CEU
    info

    Universitat Abat Oliba CEU

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00vkhbp60

Revista:
Relaciones internacionales

ISSN: 1699-3950

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Un debate global sobre el agua: enfoques actuales y casos de estudio

Número: 45

Páginas: 227-250

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15366/RELACIONESINTERNACIONALES2020.45.010 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Relaciones internacionales

Resumen

Asia’s ten main river systems originate in the Himalayas, most of them in the enormous Tibetan plateau, the Roof of the World, which holds a unique geostrategic importance in the world and is controlled by China. This is one of the countries with the most trans-boundary rivers in the world, second only to Russia and Argentina. The Asian water tower holds a position that gives it enormous power and influence, and the possible decisions Beijing can make regarding its hydraulic relations with the rest of the countries transcend the Himalayas and have a regional, continental and possibly global scope. The management of its 16 transboundary rivers can affect the availability of water in many downstream countries, directly affecting access to water resources in 14 of them on the Asian continent and almost three billion people, that is, almost half of the world population. This article aims to analyse Chinese hydraulic behaviour in the Himalayan complex, based on two case studies: Nepal and India. On the one hand, the present piece of work contributes to the debate on the explanatory factors of Chinese water behaviour, both domestically and internationally. On the other, it traces the academic debate on Chinese strategy in relation to one of the most valued resources on the planet, water. China has embarked upon 90,000 projects on hydraulic infrastructure, including dams, dikes, water diversion projects, river basin and river water transfers. These megaprojects affect both internal rivers —which suffer from the most serious scarcity and drought, such as the Yellow river or the Yangtze—, as well as international transboundary rivers, which immediately pose a threat to the countries with which it shares these rivers —such as the Brahmaputra. The Himalayas represent a strategic enclave of extraordinary significance in the international system, but it remains unknown and under studied in Spain, especially the case of Tibet, the Himalayas, and Sino-Indian relations. The theoretical framework guiding this research comes from hydropolitics, coined for the first time in 1979 by Waterbury and that holds significant explanatory power for the present work. The analysis uses hydropolitics as the systematic investigation of the interaction between riparian states, non-state actors and other participants in relation to the authorized allocation and / or use of national and international water resources. Hydro-politics is also related to the capacity of geopolitical institutions to manage shared water resources in a politically sustainable way. Two main concepts related to hydropolitics frame the research. On the one hand, hydrohegemony, understood as the preponderance position of a country within a given water complex. On the other, that of hydrodomination, highlighting the behaviour of a country trying to impose its dominion. Both concepts are notably intertwined but do not mean, or imply, the same, and both will illuminate the findings of the study of China’ water policy in the Himalayas. The text is structured as follows. First, it sets out the rationale of the paper, laying out the main objectives, the relevance of the topic under scrutiny and the appropriateness of the selected case studies. The second section bears the theoretical part of the paper and contains two main aspects. First, it depicts water as a geopolitical problem and outlines why water is a geopolitical asset. Second, it explores hydropolitics as the main explanatory approach and the two main concepts therein, hydrohegemony and hydrodomination. The main empirical part of the article is found in the third section, and unfolds by presenting the Himalayas, highlighting its strategic standpoint, namely as a key hydrological complex. It then analyses two meaningful case studies, which help address the two main questions posed by the paper. Sketching out China’s hydropower in Tibet as the main domestic factor, as the Tibetan plateau is the main source of hydrological power to China, the paper focuses on China’s projects in Nepal as the first case under the prism of the study- China is returning and increasingly stepping into this territory through several water-related projects. Then, the paper draws attention to Sino-Indian relations and, concretely, to the relations over the Sikkim region and the Chinese projects in the Brahmaputra. The summary outlines some findings of the analysis of the case studies. It states that China takes advantage of its hydrohegemony and of the current international context to impose its preferences over water relations and to pursue a unilateral, assertive, aggressive hydropolicy. China’ water context cannot be neglected, but the crisis of multilateralism and lingering geopolitical disputes in the wider Himalayan region are external factors that shape Chinese behaviour. A second finding is related to geography, as geographical considerations always matter. China’s control over the Tibetan plateau and its transboundary water character provide this country with a position which allows this country to exert some hegemony and domination vis-à-vis its riparian neighbours. This is not merely a geographical reality, but a geopolitical imperative that China always uses as a trump card. Third, China’s hydropolicy in Nepal and India seems to indicate a huge degree of continuity in Mao’s the bigger, the better policy. Beijing keeps its political strategy to become the world’s leading superpower, and this needs naturally enormous infrastructure projects, massive investments, and a global quest for natural resources. Some of the concrete projects presented, such as the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, are remarkable in that sense. The final conclusions and considerations close this article. The paper zooms out and refers to the relevance of the Himalayas, with the special case of the Tibetan plateau, to Chinese behaviour and to hydropolitics. It also proposes some topics and theoretical approaches for future research. The main argument of the article is that Chinese water policy in the Himalayas should be conceived as one more step in China’s attempt to consolidate its political and strategic presence in different parts of the world. Chinese relations must be analyzed in the context of its foreign policy over the last decade, marked by its expansionism, its crystallization as a great world power and the fostering of mega projects and initiatives on a global scale. In short, maybe the most hydropolitical imperative of China is Why should I cooperate if I can dominate?

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Administración Central del Tíbet (2020), Tibet at a Glance https://tibet.net/about-tibet/tibet-at-a-glance/ (Último acceso 25.05.2020).
  • Ancel, J. (2016). La geografía de las fronteras. El método. Geopolítica(s), 7 (1), 131-142.
  • Arpi, C. (2008). Himalayan Rivers. Geopolitics and Strategic Perspectives. Indian Defence Review, 23 (2), 56-65.
  • Baños, P. (2019). El dominio mundial. Elementos del poder y claves geopolíticas. Barcelona: Planeta.
  • Barua, A., Vij, S. y Zulfiqur, M. (2018). Powering or sharing water in the Brahmaputra River basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34 (5), 829-843.
  • Biagi, M. Fermoselle, A. y Ferro, M. (2014). Hidropolítica; los caos de Brasil y Argentina. Escuela de Guerra Naval, Armada Argentina, 60, 73–85.
  • Blanco, F. (2017). Los recursos hídricos en el mundo: cuantificación y distribución. El agua: ¿fuente de cooperación o de conflicto? Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. Cuaderno de Estrategia, 186, 21-70.
  • Brito, A. y Missio, F. (2019). Regulação e hidropolítica na fronteira Brasil-Paraguai. Desenvolvimiento e Meio Ambiente, 52, 21–47, DOI: 10.5380/dma.v52i0.65310.
  • Burgos, S. y Ear, S. (2012). The Geopolitics of China’s Global Resources Quest. Geopolitics, 17, 47–79, DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2011.562943.
  • Candela, L. y Fernández-Jáuregui, C. (1999). Prefacio. Agua y Desarrollo. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 45-46, 7-10.
  • Chellaney, B. (2011). Water. Asia’s New Battleground. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
  • Chellaney, B. (23.04.2013). China’s New War Front: Natural Resource as a Political Tool. Times of India. Disponible en https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/edit-page/Chinas-new-war-front-Natural-resource-as-a-political-tool/articleshow/19683339.cms. (28.09.2020).
  • Chellaney, B. (2009). Evitar las guerras del agua. La Vanguardia, 04.11.2009.
  • Choudary, R., Rai, S., Singh, P. y Tiwari, H. (2015). Hydropolitics between India - China: status vs Perspectives. Trabajo presentado en el Hydro 2015 International, 20th International Conference on Hydraulics, Roorkee.
  • Conde, G. (2017). Agua, poder y hegemonía entre actores estatales y no estatales en Turquía, Siria e Iraq. Estudios de Asia y África, 52, 1 (162), 5-28.
  • Davis, A., Gamble, R., Roche, G. y Gawne, L. (2020). International Relations And The Himalaya: Connecting Ecologies, Cultures And Geopolitics. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 1-21. DOI :10.1080/10357718.2020.1787333.
  • Daoudy, M. (2009). Asymmetric Power: Negotiating Water in the Euphrates and Tigris. International Negotiation, 14, 361-391.
  • De Carlos, J. (2019). La estrategia global de china para defender sus intereses. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. Documento de Opinión, 4, 1-23.
  • Delgado J. y Teano, F. (2019). El concepto de hidrohegemonía como marco de análisis de los conflictos transfronterizos por el agua. Pensando en el caso Chino. Agua y Territorio, 14, 97-104. DOI 10.17561/at.14.4437.
  • Del Valle, J. (2017). El agua, un recurso cada vez más estratégico. El agua: ¿fuente de cooperación o de conflicto?, Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. Cuaderno de Estrategia, 186, 71-117.
  • Elhance, A. (1999). Hydropolitics in the Third World. Conflict and Cooperation in International River Basins. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.
  • Elhance, A. (2000). Hydropolitics: Grounds for Despair, Reasons for Hope. International Negotiation, 5, 201-222.
  • Engelke, P. y Michel, D. (2019). Ecology meets Geopolitics. Water Security in Himalayan Asia. Washington DC: Atlantic Council.
  • Espinoza, E. (2019). Los recursos naturales son poder: la geopolítica de las periferias latinoamericanas durante el boom de precios de materias primas y el ascenso económico de China. Geopolítica(s), 10 (2), 229–258, https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/geop.66399
  • Fernández-Jáuregui, C. (2017). Introducción. El agua: ¿fuente de cooperación o de conflicto?, Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. Cuaderno de Estrategia, 186, 13-19.
  • Fernández-Jáuregui, C. (1999). El agua como fuente de conflictos: repaso de los focos de conflictos en el mundo. Agua y Desarrollo. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 45-46, 179-194.
  • Fundación Casa del Tíbet (2020). Historia del Tíbet. https://www.casadeltibetbcn.org/es/la-casa-del-tibet/el-tibet (16.04.2020).
  • Huber, A. (2019). Hydropower in the Himalayan Hazardscape: Strategic Ignorance and the Production of Unequal Risk. Water, 11(414). DOI: 10.3390/w11030414
  • Hukil, R. (9.05.2013). India, China and the Brahmaputra: Understanding the Hydro-Politics. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. Recuperado de: http://www.ipcs.org/comm_select.php?articleNo=3925. (27.09.2020).
  • Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (2012). Tibet and India's security: Himalayan region, refugees and Sino-Indian relations. IDSA Task Force Report.
  • Jiménez, T. (2009). La cuestión del agua. Medio ambiente, cambio climático y conflictos internacionales. Barcelona: Universidad de Barcelona.
  • Jordán, J. (2018). Un modelo de análisis geopolítico para el estudio de las relaciones internacionales. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. Documento Marco 04, 1-44.
  • Julien, F. (2012). Hydropolitics is What Societies Make of It (or Why We Need a Constructivist Approach to the Geopolitics of Water). International Journal of Sustainable Society, 4, 1-2, 45-71.
  • Kaplan, R. (2014). La venganza de la geografía. Cómo los mapas condicionan el destino de las naciones. Barcelona: RBA.
  • Kauffer, E. (2011). Hidropolíticas en la frontera entre México, Guatemala y Belice: la necesaria redefinición de un concepto para analizar la complejidad de las relaciones en torno al agua en escenarios transfronterizos. Aqua-LAC, 3 (1), 157-166.
  • Kehl, J.R. (2011), Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power. Conflict, Cooperation and Governance of International River Systems, Journal of World-Systems Research, 17 (1), 218-235. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2011.429
  • Kelly P. (2018). The United States and the geopolitics of water: human need, Mississippi river barges, and offshore Eurasian balancing. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 10 (1), 94–118, DOI:10.22381/GHIR10120185
  • Köpke, S. (marzo, 2016). The Hydropolitics of the Brahmaputra: A Political Ecology of Water, comunicación presentada en Undisciplined Environments, Estocolmo.
  • La Vanguardia (2015). La gran presa china en el Tíbet funciona desde hoy a pleno rendimiento (13.10.2015). Recuperado de: https://www.lavanguardia.com/economia/20151013/54437196014/la-gran-presa-china-en-el-tibet-funciona-desde-hoy-a-pleno-rendimiento.html
  • Li, Z. y Wu, F. (2017). China and shared water resources: geopolitics, domestic institutions and global Governance. En Wu, F. y Zhang, H. (Eds.). China's Global Quest for Resources. Energy, Food and Water (59-78). Oxon: Routledge.
  • López Trigal, L. (2016). La cuestión geográfica del Estado-nación y la ‘frontera natural’. Geopolítica(s), 7 (1), 143–151. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_GEOP.2016.v7.n1.52955
  • Lord, A. (2014). Making a ‘Hydropower Nation’: Subjectivity, Mobility, and Work in the Nepalese Hydroscape. Himalaya, Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies, 34, 111-121.
  • Martínez, R. (2014). ¿Por qué China se empecina en invadir el Tíbet? El Confidencial, https://www.elconfidencial.com/mundo/2009-10-10/por-que-china-se-empecina-en-ocupar-el-tibet_244828/ (18.03.2020).
  • Mackinder, J. (1904). The Geographical Pivot of History. Conferencia pronunciada ante la Royal Geographical Society, Londres. Reproducida en The Geographical Journal, 23 (4), 421-437.
  • Marsden, S, y Brandon, E. (2015). Transboundary Environmental Governance in Asia: Practice and Prospects with UNECE Agreements. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Marshall, T. (2015). Prisoners of Geography. Ten Maps That Explain Everything About The World. Nueva York: Elliot and Thompson Limited.
  • Mgquba, S. y Majozi, S. (2020). Climate change and its impacts on hydro-politics in transboundary basins: a case study of the Orange-Senqu River basin, Journal of Water and Climate Change, 11 (1), 150–165. DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2018.166
  • Mouron, F., Urdinez, F. y Schenoni, L. (2016). Sin espacio para todos: China y la competencia por el Sur. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 114, 17-39.
  • Murton, G. (2016). Making Mountain Places into State Spaces: Infrastructure, Consumption, and Territorial Practice in a Himalayan Borderland. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1-10. DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2016.123216
  • Murton, G. (2019). Facing the fence: The production and performance of a Himalayan border in global contexts. Political Geography, 72, 1-12.
  • Murton, G., Lord, A. y Beazley, R. (2016). “A handshake across the Himalayas:” Chinese investment, hydropower development, and state formation in Nepal. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 1-31. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1236349
  • Murton, G. y Lord, A. (2020). Trans-Himalayan power corridors: Infrastructural politics and China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Nepal. Political Geography, 77, 1-13.
  • Pardo, J. (2019). El conflicto fronterizo entre India y China, Doklam. Implicaciones geoestratégicas. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. Documento de Opinión, 38, 1-15.
  • Pérez Martín, M. (2013). Recursos hídricos y organizaciones multilaterales de seguridad en Asia Central. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 101, 129-150.
  • Pomeranz, K. (2013). Asia’s Unstable Water Tower: The Politics, Economics, and Ecology of Himalayan Water
  • Projects. Asia Policy, 10 (16), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2013.0023
  • Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2006), Más allá de la escasez: poder, pobreza y la crisis mundial del agua, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2006_es_completo.pdf
  • Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2016), Desarrollo Humano Para Todos, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/HDR2016_SP_Overview_Web_0.pdf
  • Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente (2007), Vulnerabilidad y Resistencia Hidropolíticas en Aguas Internacionales. América Latina y el Caribe, 1-133. Recuperado de: http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/7803/hydropolitical_sp_LA.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y
  • Roca, J. (2015). La china Huaneng completa la mayor central hidroeléctrica del Tíbet. El periódico de la energía (27.10.2015). Recuperado de: https://elperiodicodelaenergia.com/la-china-huaneng-completa-la-mayor-central-hidroelectrica-del-tibet/
  • Rodríguez, M. (2018). El mayor trasvase de agua de la historia de China. Recuperado de: https://cincodias.elpais.com/cincodias/2018/12/17/companias/1545063184_504455.html (17.08.2020).
  • Rogers, S. y Crow Miller, B. (2017). The politics of water: a review of hydropolitical frameworks and their application in China. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, 12 (39), 1–15, DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1239
  • Schneiderman, S. (2013). Himalayan border citizens: Sovereignty and mobility in the Nepal-Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) of China border zone. Political Geography, 35, 25-36.
  • Segrelles, J. (2007). Geopolítica del agua en América Latina. Dependencia, exclusión y privatización, Trabajo presentado en el XVI Simposio Polaco-Mexicano, Varsovia.
  • Selby, J. (2005). The geopolitics of water in the Middle East: fantasies and realities. Third World Quarterly, 26 (2), 329-349.
  • Selby, J. y Hoffmann, C. (2014). Beyond scarcity: rethinking water, climate change and conflict in the Sudans. Global Environmental Change, 29, 360-370.
  • South to North Diversion Project. Recuperado de: https://www.water-technology.net/projects/south_north/ (16.08.2020).
  • Turton, A. y Henwood, R. (2002). Hydropolitics in the developing world: a Southern African perspective. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
  • Urban, F., Siciliano, G., y Nordensvard, J. (2018). China’s dam-builders: their role in transboundary river management in South-East Asia. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34 (5), 747-770.
  • Velloso, M. (2018). La estrategia de China en la región del Himalaya. Consejo Argentino para las relaciones Internacionales. Recuperado de: http://www.cari.org.ar/temas/himalaya.html (23.05.2020).
  • Walcott, S. (2010). Bordering the Eastern Himalaya: Boundaries, Passes, Power Contestations. Geopolitics, 15, 62-81, DOI: 10.1080/14650040903420396
  • Waterbury, J. (1979). Hydropolitics of the Nile Valley. Nueva York: Syracuse University Press.
  • Wester, P., Mishra, A., Mukherji, A., y Shrestha, A. (2019). The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment Mountains, Climate Change, Sustainability and People. Kathmandu: Springer Open.
  • Yuan, C. (2018). China’s Contingencies: Critical Geopolitics, Chinese Exceptionalism and the Uses of History. Geopolitics, 23 (1), 67–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1302429
  • Zeitoun, M. y Warner, J. (2006), Hydro-hegemony: a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8, 435-460.
  • Zhang, H. (2015). Sino-Indian water disputes: the coming water wars? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3 (2), 155–166. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1123
  • Zhang, H. y Li, M. (2018). Hydropolitics and Conflict Management in Transboundary River Basins: China and its Neighbours. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34 (5), 699–704. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2018.1499201
  • Zhang, H. y Li, M. (2018b). Editorial-Hydropolitics and Conflict Management in Transboundary River Basins: China and its Neighbours. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34 (5), 699-704.
  • Zhang, H. y Li, M. (2018c). A process-based framework to examine China’s approach to transboundary water management. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34 (5), 705-731.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet