Análisis de la legibilidad de la información sanitaria dirigida a la población vulnerable

Références bibliographiques

• Abdi, I., Bernice, M., Sealea, H. (2020).Evaluating the health literacy demand and cultural appropriateness of online immunization information available to refugee and migrant communities in Australia. Vaccine, 38 (41), pp. 6410-6417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.071
• Alliende, F. (2002). La legibilidad de los textos. Manual para la evaluación, selección y elaboración de textos. Andrés Bello
• Alsaiari, A., Joury, A., Aljuaid, M., Wazzan, M., y Pines, J. M. (2016). The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer. Journal of Cancer Education, 4-29.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1039-9
• Arsenault, M., Blouin M.J., Guitton, M.J. (2016) Information quality and dynamics of patients' interactions on tonsillectomy web resources. Internet Interventions, 4, pp. 99–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.05.002
• Avis, L.S. Komarnicki, A., Farmer, A.P., Holt, N.L., Perez, A., Spence, N., Ball, G. (2015). Tools and resources for preventing childhood obesity in primary care: a method of evaluation and preliminary assessment. Patient Education Counseling, 99(5), pp. 769 – 7. 10.1016 / j.pec.2015.12.006
• Balakrishnan, V., Zachariah Chandy, M.S, Sunil, P., Berma, M.D. (2015). Are Online Zenker’s Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable? Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 155 (5), pp.758 – 763.10.1177/0194599816655302
• Balakrishnan, V., Zachariah, M.S., Hseih, A., Bui, T.L. (2016). Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 154, (3), pp. 460 – 464 doi:10.1177/0194599815626146
• Barrio, I. (2007). Legibilidad y Salud: Los Métodos de Medición de la Legibilidad y su Aplicación al Diseño de Folletos Educativos sobre Salud. (Tesis Doctoral). Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Granada.
• Basagoiti, I. (2012.). Alfabetización en salud. De la información a la acción. Valencia. ITACA/TSB. Disponible en http://www.salupedia.org/alfabetizacion
• Bas-Sarmiento, P., Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Albar-Marín, M. J. y García-Ramírez, M. (2015). Percepción y experiencias en el acceso y uso de los servicios sanitarios en población inmigrante. Gaceta Sanitaria, 29 (4), pp. 244-251. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.03.008
• Behmer, R., Gold, J., Lad, M., Gupta, R., Ganapa, S., Mammis, A. (2020). Health literacy among neurosurgery and other surgical subspecialties: Readability of online patient materials found with Google. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 197, 106141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106141
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Free Press.
• Berland, G.K., Elliott, M.N., Morales, L.S., Algazy, J.I., Kravitz, RL…Broder MS. (2001). Health Information on the Internet. Accessibility, Quality, and Readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(20), pp. 2612-2621. doi:10.1001/jama.285.20.2612
• Blanco Pérez, A., Gutiérrez, Couto, U. (2002). Legibilidad de las páginas web sobre salud dirigidas a pacientes y lectores de la población general. Revista Española Salud Publica, 76(4), pp. 321–31.
• Bompastore, N., Cisu, T., Holoch, P. (2018). Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease. Urology, 118, pp. 59-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.054
• Boyer, C., Selby, M., Scherrer, J.R., Appel, RD. (1998). The Health on the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 28, pp. 603–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4825(98)00037-7
• Breakey, V. R., Harris, L., Davis, O., Agarwal, A., Ouellette, C., Akinnawo, E. y Stinson, J. (2017). The quality of information about sickle cell disease on the Internet for youth. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 64. e26309. 10.1002 / pbc.26309
• Buccini, L., Iverson, D., Caputi, P., Jones, C. (2010). An Australian based study on the readability of HIV/AIDS and type 2 diabetes clinical trial informed consent documents. Journal Bioethical Inquiry, 7 (3), pp. 313–319.
• Burkell, J.A. (2004). Health information seals of approval: What do they signify? Information Communication and Society, 7(4), pp. 491-509. 10.1080/1369118042000305610
• Castillo-Ortiza, J.D., Valdivia-Nunoa,J.J., Ramirez-Gomeza,A., Garagarza-Mariscala, H., Gallegos-Riosa, C… Flores-Hernandez G. (2017). Readability, relevance and quality of the information in Spanish on the Web for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Reumatología Clínica, 13, pp. 139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2016.04.009
• Charbonneau D.H. (2012). Readability of Menopause Web Sites: A Cross Sectional Study. Journal of Women & Aging, 24 (4), pp. 280-291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2012.708574
• Cheng, C. y Dunn, M. (2015). Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39, pp. 309–314. 10.1111/1753-6405.12341
• Cherla, D.V., Sanghvi, S., Choudhry, O.J., Liu, J.K., Eloy, J.A. (2012). Readability Assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 122, pp. 1649–1654. doi: 10.1002 / lary.23309
• Chesser, A., Burke, A., Reyes, J., Rohrberg, T. (2016). Navigating the digital divide: A systematic review of eHealth literacy in underserved populations in the United States. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 41(1), pp. 1-19. 10.3109/17538157.2014.948171
• Chumber, S., Huber, J., Ghezzi, P. (2014). A Methodology to Analyze the Quality of Health Information on the Internet. The Diabetes Educator, 41 (1), pp. 95-105. 10.1177/0145721714560772
• Cisua, T.I., Mingina, G.C., Baskinb, L.S. (2019). An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 15(1) 40.e1-40. e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020
• Cochrane, Z., Gregory, P., Wilson, A. (2012). Readability of consumer health information on the internet: A comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites. Journal of Health Community, 17 (9), pp. 1003–1010.:10.1080 / 10810730.2011.650823
• Colaco, M., Svider, P., Agarwal, N., Eloy, J.A., Jackson, I.M. (2013). Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials. The Journal of Urology, 189, pp. 1048–1052. doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255
• Cooke, A., Gray, L. (2002). Evaluating the quality of internet-based information about alternative therapies: development of the biome guidelines. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 24, pp. 261–267.
• Corcoran, N., Ahmad, F. (2016). The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets. Patient Educations Counseling, 99, pp. 284–286. 10.1016 / j.pec.2015.09.003
• Craigie, M., Loader, B., Burrows, R., Muncer, S. (2002). Reliability of Health Information on the Internet: An Examination of Experts' Ratings. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(1), 2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.1.e2
• Dale, E. y Chall, J.S. (1948a). A Formula for Predicting Readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 17(1), pp. 11-20-28. DuBay WH. The Classic Readability Studies. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/quality/plaintalk/resources/classics.pdf
• Dale, E. y Chall, J.S. (1948b). A Formula for Predicting Readability: Instructions. Educational Research Bulletin, 17, pp. 37-54. DuBay WH. The Classic Readability Studies. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/quality/plaintalk/resources/classics.pdf
• Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2010). Health literacy online: A guide to writing and designing easy-to-use health Web sites. Washington, DC. https://health.gov/healthliteracyonline/2010/Web_Guide_Health_Lit_Online.pdf
• Devea R., De, BS., Justine Seivright, B.S., Danielle Yee, MD., Hsiao, M.D., Shi, V. (2022). Readability, quality, and timeliness of patient online health resources for urticaria. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 86 (5), pp. 1182-1185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.089
• Diviani, N., Van den Putte, B., Giani, S, Van Weert, J.C. (2015). Low Health Literacy and Evaluation of Online Health Information: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), 112. 10.2196/jmir.4018
• Do, B.N., Nguyen, P.A., Pham, K.M., Nguyen, H.C., Nguyen, M.H., Tran, C.Q…Van Duong T. (2020). Determinants of health literacy and its associations with health-related behaviors, depression among the older people with and without suspected COVID-19 symptoms: a multi-institutional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.581746
• Doak, C.C., Doak, L.G., Root, JH. (1996). Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Company, 212 https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthliteracy/resources/teaching-patients-with-low-literacy-skills/
• Edmunds, M. R., Denniston, A. K., Boelaert, K., Franklyn, J. A., y Durrani, O. M. (2014). Patient Information in Graves’ disease and Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy: Readability Assessment of Online Resources. Thyroid, 24(1), pp. 67–72. 10.1089/thy.2013.0252.
• Ellimoottil, C., Polcari, A, Kadlec, A, Gupta, G. (2012). Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options. The Journal of Urology, 188 (6), pp. 2171–2175. 10.1016 / j.juro.2012.07.105
• Eloy, J.A., Li, S., Kasabwala K, Agarwal N., Hansberry, D.R., Baredes, S., Setzen, M. (2012). Readability assessment of patient education materials on major otolaryngology association websites. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 47, pp. 848–854. 10.1177 / 0194599812456152
• Eysenbach, G. y Köhler, C. (2002a). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal, 324, pp. 573–577. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573
• Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., Sa, E.R. (2002b). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: A Systematic Review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(20), pp. 2691-2700. doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2691
• Fahy, E., Hardikar, R., Fox, A., Mackay, S. (2014). Quality of patient health information on the internet: Reviewing a complete and evolving landscape. Australiasian Medical Journal, 7 (1), pp. 24-28. http//dx.doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2014.1900.
• Fernández A., Insfrana, E., Abrahãoa, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53, pp. 789–817
• Ferrando Belart, V. (2004). La legibilidad: un factor fundamental para comprender un texto. Atención Primaria, 34, pp. 143-146.
• Ferrán-Ferrer, N., Pérez Montoro, M. (2012) Búsqueda y recuperación de la información. Barcelona: Editorial UOC.
• Feufel, M.A., y Stahl, S.F. (2012). What do Web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(3), 87. http://www.jmir.org/2012/3/e87/
• Finnie, R. K. C., Felder, T. M., Linder, S. K., y Mullen, P. D. (2010). Beyond Reading Level: A Systematic Review of the Suitability of Cancer Education Print and Web-based Materials. Journal of Cancer Education, 25(4), pp. 497–505. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0075-0
• Fitzsimmons, P., Michael, B., Hulley, J., Scott, G. (2010). A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. Journal of the Royal College Physicians Edinburgh, 40(4), pp. 292-296.doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2010.401
• Flesch R. (1958). How to Write, Speak and Think More Effectively. Harper.
• Flesch, R. (1943). Estimating the Comprehension Difficulty of Magazines Articles. Journal of General Psysiology, 28, pp. 63-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1943.10545195
• Flesch, R.F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, pp. 221–233 10.1037 / h0057532.
• Friedman, D.B., Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2006). A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education Behavior, 33, pp. 352–373. 10.1177 / 1090198105277329
• Friis, K., Aaby, A., Lasgaard, M., Pedersen, M.H., Osborne, R.H., Maindal, H.T. (2020). Low health literacy and mortality in individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and mental illness: a 6-year population-based follow-up study. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (24). 10.3390/ijerph17249399
• García-Rivera, E., San Norberto, M., Fidalgo, L., Domingos, N., Cenizo, I., Estévez Fernández, C., Vaquero, P. (2020). Legibilidad de los consentimientos informados en cirugía vascular y análisis de su evolución en el tiempo. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research, 35 (6), pp. 355-363
• Ghasemaghaei, M., Hassanein, K. (2016). A macro model of online information quality perceptions: A review and synthesis of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, pp. 972–991. doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.027
• González-Alliende, F. (1994). La Legibilidad de los Textos. Ed. Andrés Bello.
• González-Soltero, R., Blanco, M.J. Biscaia, J. M. Mohedano, R.B. Grille-Mariscal, M. Blanco, M.A. (2015). Análisis del contenido, posicionamiento y calidad de páginas web en español relacionadas con la nutrición y los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 31(3), pp. 1394-1402. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=309235369054
• Google PageRank (PR). (2016) Recuperado de: http://ninjaseo.es/google-pagerank-pr-que-es-como-calcularlo-y-mejorarlo/
• Gorczynski, P., Patel, H, y Ganguli, R. (2013) Evaluating the accuracy, quality, and readability of online physical activity, exercise, and sport information for people with schizophrenia. Mental Health and Physical Activity 6, (2) pp. 95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.06.001
• Gordon EJ, Rodde J, Gil S, Caicedo JC. (2012). Quality of Internet education about living kidney donation for Hispanics. Progress in Transplantion, 22, pp. 294–303. 10.7182/pit2012802
• Guitton, M.J. (2015a). Online maritime health information: an overview of the situation. International Maritime Health, 6, pp. 139–144. 10.5603 / IMH.2015.0028
• Guitton, M.J. (2015b). Swimming with mermaids: communication and social density in the second life merfolk community. Computers Human Behavior, 48, pp. 226–235. http://dx.doi.org.bibezproxy.uca.es:2048/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.004
• Gunning Fog Index (acceso libre). http://gunning-fog-index.com/
• Gunning, R. (1968). The Technique of Clear Writing (Revised ed.) McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Hamnes, B., Van Eijk-Hustings and Primdahl, J. (2016). Readability of patient information and consent documents in rheumatologically studies. British Medical Ethics, 17, 42.10.1186/s12910-016-0126-0
• Hansberry, D.R., Agarwal, N., Gonzalez, S.F., Baker, S.R. (2014). Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology. American Journal Neuroradiology, 35, pp. 1270–1275. 10.3174/ajnr.A3854
• Helitzer, D., Hollis, C., Cotner, J., Oestreicher, N. (2009). Health literacy demands of written health information materials: an assessment of cervical cancer prevention materials. Cancer Control, 16, pp. 70–78.
• Herrera-Viedma, E., Pasi, G., Lopez-Herrera, A.G., Porcel, C. (2006). Evaluating The Information Quality of websites: a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(4), pp. 538–549. doi: 10.1002/asi.20308
• Impicciatore, P., Pandolfini, C., Casella, N., Bonati, M. (1997). Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. British Medical Journal, 28, 314, pp. 1875–1879. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875
• INE (2021). Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares. https://www.ine.es/prensa/tich_2021.pdf
• Irwin, S.C., Lennon, D.T., Stanley, C.P., Sheridan, G.A., Walsh, J.C., (2021). Ankle conFUSION: the quality and readability of information on the internet relating to ankle arthrodesis. Surgeon, 19 (6), pp. 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.12.001
• Jahan, S., Al-Saigul A.M., Alharbi, Ali M., Abdelgadir M.H. (2014). Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 21(3), pp. 186–192. 10.4103/2230-8229.142974
• Jiménez Pernett J., García Gutiérrez, J.F., Bermúdez Tamayo, C. (2009). Accesibilidad de sitios web sobre salud para mayores. Revista Española Geriatría Gerontología, 44(6), pp. 342–348. 10.1016/j.regg.2009.07.001
• Kecojevic, A., Basch C.H., Garcia P. (2020). Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) Public Health, 182, pp. 53-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.02.002
• Kind, T., Huang, Z., Farr, D., Pomerantz, KL. (2015). Internet and computer access and use for health information in an underserved community. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5, pp. 117–21. 10.1367 / A04-107R.1
• Kreuter M., Green M., Cappella J., Slater M., Wise M., Storey, D…Woolley S. (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, pp. 221–235.
• Kružliaková, N., Porter, K., Ray, P.A., Hedrick, V., Brock, D.J., Zoellner, J. (2021). Understanding and advancing organizational health literacy within a public health setting. Health Literacy Research and Practice, 5 (1), pp. 35-48. 10.3928/24748307-20210114-01
• Lambert K., Mullan J., Mansfield K., Koukomous A. & Mesiti L. (2017) Evaluation of the quality and health literacy demand of online renal diet information. Journal of Human Nutrition Dietetics. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12466
• Lim, S.T., Kelly, M., Johnston, S. (2021). Re: ‘Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study’. Public Health, 190, pp.145-146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.09.001
• Lupón, M., Genis, M. (2021). Public knowledge of low vision and blindness, and readability of on-topic online information. Journal of Optometry, 14 (3), pp. 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2020.06.005
• Mackert, M., Kahlor, L., Tyler, D., Gustafson, J. (2009). Designing e-health interventions for low-health-literate culturally diverse parents: addressing the obesity epidemic. Telemedice and e-health, 15, pp. 672–677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0012
• Mariscal-Crespo, M.I., Coronado-Vázquez, M.V., Ramírez-Durá, M.V. (2017). Análisis global de la legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado utilizados en los hospitales públicos de España. Revista de calidad asistencial, 32 (4), pp. 200-208 10.1016/j.cali.2017.01.003
• Martínez de Sousa J. (2005). Manual de edición y autoedición, Pirámide.
• McCall, W.A., Schroeder, L.C. (1979). McCall-Crabbs Standard Test Lessons in Reading. Teachers College Press.
• McInnes, N., Haglund, B.J. (2011). Readability of online health information: implications for health literacy. Informatics Health Social Care, 36(4), pp. 173-89. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2010.542529.
• McLaughlin, G.H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12, pp. 639–646 file:///C:/Users/Noelia/Downloads/WRRSMOG_Readability_Formula_G._Harry_McLaughlin__1969_%20(2).pdf
• Minayo, M.C. (2002). La Etapa de Análisis en los Estudios Cualitativos. En: Mercado FJ, Gastaldo D, Calderón C. Paradigmas y Diseños de la Investigación Cualitativa en Salud. Métodos, Análisis y Ética. Guadalajara, Jalisco (México): Universidad de Guadalajara, pp. 239-69.
• Moore, J.E., Millar, B.C. (2021). Improving IPC health literacy through better communication: investigation of the readability of IPC patient information leaflets from several sources. Journal of Hospital Infection, 118, pp. 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.007
• Moreno, J.M., Morales del Castillo, J.M., Porcel, C., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2010). A quality evaluation methodology for health-related websites based on a 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. Soft Computing, 14, 887. 10.1007/s00500-009-0472-7
• Mousiolis, A., Michala, L., Antsaklis, A. (2012). A Polycystic ovary syndrome: double click and right check. What do patients learn from the Internet about PCOS? European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 163(1), pp. 43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.03.028
• Muñoz-Baquedano, M. (2006). Legibilidad y variabilidad de los textos. Viña del Mar: Universidad de Playa Ancha de Ciencias de la Educación. Recuperado de: http://legibilidadmu.cl/1.pdf
• Murphy, B., Irwin, S., Condon, F., Kennedy , C. (2022). Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis. Surgeon, (Article in press) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.009
• Murphy, S.T., Frank, L.B. y Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Narrative versus non-narrative: the role of identification, transportation and emotion in reducing health disparities. Journal of Communications, 63, pp. 1–26.10.1111/jcom.12007
• Nason, G.J., Baker, M.M., Damien, P. Noel, J., Moore, D., Kiely, P.J. (2012). Scoliosis-specific information on the internet: has the "information highway" led to better information provision? Spine Update, 1, 37(21), pp. 1364-1369. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826619b5
• National Institutes of Health. (2017). How to Write Easy to Read Health Materials. Recuperado de: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html
• Navas Martín, M.A., Albornos-Muñoz, L., Escandell-García, C. (2012). Acceso a Fuentes de información sobre salud en España: Como combatir la Infoxicación. Revista Enfermería Clínica, 22(3), pp. 154-155.
• Nölke, L., Mensing, M., Krämer, A., Hornberg, C. (2015). Sociodemographic and health-(care-) related characteristics of online health information seekers: a cross-sectional German study. British Public Health, 15, 31. 10.1186/s12889-015-1423-0
• O Doinn, T., Broderick, J.M., Abdelhalim, M.M., Quinlan, J.F. (2020). Readability of patient educational materials in hip and knee arthroplasty: has a decade made a difference? Journal Arthroplasty, 35 (11), pp. 3076-3083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.076
• Oliffe, M., Thompson. E., Johnston, J., Freeman, D., Bagga, H., Wong, P.K. (2019). Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study. British Medical Journal Open, 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024582
• Ostrovsky, A.M. (2022). Readability of online health information associated with the most common emergency department diagnoses. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 53, pp. 266-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.071
• Paasche-Orlow, M.K., Brancati, F.L., Taylor, H.A., Jain, S., Pandit, A., Wolf, M.S. (2013). Readability of consent form templates: a second look. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 35(4), pp. 12–19.
• Pace, C., Atcherson S.R., Zraick, R. (2012). A computer-based readability analysis of patient-reported outcome questionnaires related to oral health quality of life. Patient Education Counseling, 89, pp. 76–81 http://dx.doi.org.bibezproxy.uca.es:2048/10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.010
• Pandolfini, C., Impicciatore, P., Bonati, M. (2000). Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children. Pediatrics, 105 (1). doi: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/105/1/e1
• Patel, S.K., Gordon, E., Wong; C.A., Grobman, W.A., Goucher., H., Toledo, P. (2015). Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 121(5), pp. 1295–1300. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000888
• Peiris, R., Cornella, S., Greaves, K., Bonnera, C. (2021).Do hospital consent forms for cardiology procedures meet health literacy standards? Evaluation of understandability and readability. Patient Education and Counseling (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.027
• Piñero López, M. A. (2014). Evaluación de la comprensibilidad y legibilidad de prospectos de medicamentos biotecnológicos. Tesis Doctoral. Facultad de Farmacia. Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica. Universidad de Barcelona.
• Polishchuk, D., Hashem, J. y Sabharwal, S. (2012). Readability of online patient education materials on adult reconstruction web sites. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 27, pp. 716–719. doi: 10.1016 / j.arth.2011.08.020
• Porras-Garzón., J.M., Estopà, R. (2020). Escalas de legibilidad aplicadas a informes médicos: límites de un análisis cuantitativo formal. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 83, pp. 205-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/clac.70574
• Powers, R. D., Sumners, W.A, Kearl, B.E. (1958). A recalculation of four adult readability formulas. Journal Education Psychology, 49, pp. 99–105. 10.1037 / h0043254
• Reichow, B., Shefcyk, A., Bruder, M.B. (2013). Quality comparison of websites related to developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34, pp. 3077–3083. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.013
• Reynolds, R., Scannell, M., Collins, S., Colavita, J. (2022). Readability and health literacy level of post-exposure prophylaxis patient education materials offered after sexual assault. International Emergency Nursing, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101104
• Richaudeau, F. (1984). La Legibilidad. Investigaciones Actuales. Fundación Sánchez Ruipérez. Ed. Pirámide.
• Rishabh, B.S., Anjani, B.A., Raghav, M.P.H., Scott, J.F. (2020). 14042 Readability of online Spanish-language patient education materials in dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 83, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.603
• Risoldi, Z., Gregory, P., Wilson, A. (2012). Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites. Journal of Health Communication, 17, pp. 1003-1010. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.650823
• Rose, D.E. y Levinson, D. (2004). Understanding user Goals in Web Search. Proc. Of Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), pp. 74-89. http://www.ambuehler.ethz.ch/CDstore/www2004/docs/1p13.pdf
• Rubiera, G., Arbizub, R., Alzuetac, A., Agúndez, J.J., Rierab, J.R. (2004). La legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado en los hospitales de Asturias. Gaceta Sanitaria, 18(2), pp. 153-158.
• Salmon, C., O’ Conor, R., Singh, S., Ramaswamy, R., Kannry, J… Wolf, M. (2016). Characteristics of outpatient clinical summaries in the United States. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 94, pp. 75-80. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.005
• San Norberto, E., Taylor, J., Salvador, R., Revilla, A., Merino, B., Vaquero, C. (2011). Calidad de la información disponible en internet sobre el aneurisma de aorta y su tratamiento endovascular. Revista Española de Cardiología, 64(10), pp. 869–875
• Sanghvi, S., Cherla, D. V., Shukla, P. A., Eloy, J. A. (2012), Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures. The Laryngoscope, 122, pp. 1943–1948. doi:10.1002/lary.23424
• Scullard, P., Peacock, C; Davies, P. (2010) Googling children's health: reliability of medical advice on the internet. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95, pp. 580–582.doi: 10.1136 / adc.2009.168856
• Shambavi, J., Rao., J.C., Nickel, NI., Navarro, L., Madden, L. (2021). Readability Analysis of Spanish Language Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Laryngology. Journal and Voice, (Articulo in press) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.025
• Sheridan, G.A., O'Brien, C., Masri, B.A., Duncan, C.P., Garbuz, D.S. (2020). Revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet. World Journal Orthoped, 11 (2), pp. 82-89. https://dx.doi.org/10.5312%2Fwjo.v11.i2.82
• Shoemaker, S.J., Wolf, M.S., Brach C. (2014). Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): A new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educations Counseling, 96, pp. 395–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027
• Simón-Lorda, P., Barrio Cantalejo, I.M., Concheiro Carro, L. (1996). Legibilidad de los Formularios Escritos de Consentimiento Informado. Medicina Clínica, 107, pp. 524-529.
• Sowter, J., Astin, F., Dye, L., Marshall, P., Knapp, P. (2016). Assessment of the quality and content of website health information about herbal remedies for menopausal symptoms. Maturitas, 88, pp. 16 – 22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.02.016
• Statista: The Statistics Portal. Worldwide market share of leading search engines. Recuperado de: https://www.statista.com/statistics/216573/worldwide-market-share-of-search-engines/
• Stavropoulou-Tatla, S., Hazra, D., Awal., Fardanesh, F., McCaig., F., Hossain, M. (2022). Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Online Resources on Unspecified Kidney Donation. Transplantation Proceedings, (in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.12.047https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=ELS&contentID=S0041134522001063&orderBeanReset=true
• Stefu, J., B Slavych, B., Zraick, R.I. (2021). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Voice: An Updated Readability Analysis. Journal of Voice, (Article in press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.028
• Storr, T., Maher, J, y Swanepoel, E. (2016) Online nutrition information for pregnant women: a content analysis. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13, e12315.: 10.1111/mcn.12315
• Stvilia, B., Mon, L., Yi, Y.J. (2009). A model for online consumer health information quality. Journal of the Association Information Science and technology, 60, pp. 1781–1791. 10.1002/asi.21115
• Su-I Hou (2012). Health Literacy Online. A Guide to Writing and Designing Easy-to-Use. Health Promotion Practice, 13 (5), pp. 577 – 580. 10.1177/1524839912446480
• Szmuda, T., Özdemir, C., Ali, S., Singh, A., Syed, M.T., Słoniewski, P. (2020). Readability of online patient education material for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a cross-sectional health literacy study. Public Health, 185, pp. 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.041
• Taki, S., Campbell, K.J., Russell, C.G., Elliott, R., Laws, R., Denney-Wilson, E. (2015) Infant Feeding Websites and Apps: A Systematic Assessment of Quality and Content Interact. Journal of Medical Research, 4(3), 18. 10.2196/ijmr.4323
• Taylor, D.M., Fraser, S., Dudley, C., Oniscu, G.C., Tomson, C., Ravanan, R., Roderick, P. (2018). Health literacy and patient outcomes in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Nephrol, Dialysis, Transplant, 33 (9), pp. 1545-1558. 10.1093/ndt/gfx293
• Taylor, H.E, Bramley, D.E. (2012). An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesthesia Intensive Care, 40(6), pp. 995–998.
• Thorndike, E. L y Lorge, I.A. (1932). The Teacher´s Word Book of 20.000 Words Found Most Frequently and Widely in General Reading for Children and Young People. Teacher´s College.
• Thorndike, E.L y Lorge, I.A. (1944). The Teacher´s Word Book of 30.000 Words. New York. New York Teacher´s College. Colombia University: Bureau of Publications.
• Thorndike, E.L. (1917a). The Psychology on Thinking in the Case on Reading Psychological. Review, 24, pp. 220-234. 10.1037 / h0071258
• Thorndike, E.L. (1917b). Reading and Reasoning: A Study of Mistakes in Paragraph Reading. Journal Educational Psychology, 8, pp. 323-332.: 10.1037 / h0075325
• Thorndike, E.L. (1917c). The Understanding of Sentences. Journal Educational Psychology, 18, pp. 98-114.: http://www.jstor.org/stable/993655 [acceso marzo 2017]
• Thorndike, E.L. (1921). A Teacher`s Word Book. New York: Teachers College. Columbia University
• UIT (2021). 2.900 millones de personas siguen careciendo de conexión. Unión Internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT). https://www.itu.int/es/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2021-11-29-FactsFigures.aspx
• Unaka, N.I., Statile, A., Haney, J., Beck, A.F., Brady, PW… Karen, E. (2017). Assessment of readability, understandability, and completeness of pediatric hospital medicine discharge instructions. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2, pp. 98-101.10.12788/jhm.2688
• Vargas C., Chuang D., Ganor O., Lee B. (2014). Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer. Surgery, 156, pp. 311–318. 10.1016 / j.surg.2014.03.004
• Villamañan, E, Ruano, M, Fernandez-Uzquiano, E, Lavilla, P, Gonzalez, D, Freire, M, Sobrino, C, Herrero, A. Informed consent in clinical research; Do patients understand what they have signed? Farmacia Hospitalaria, 40 (3), pp. 209–218. 10.7399/fh.2016.40.3.10411
• Vogel, M, y Washburne, C. (1928). An Objective Method of Determining Grade Placement of Children’s Reading Material. The Elementary School Journal, 28, 373-381. Original Disponible en: DuBay WH. The Classic Readability Studies. (Libro electrónico). http://www.ecy.wa.gov/quality/plaintalk/resources/classics.pdf
• Walsh, T. y Volsko, T. (2008) Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respiratory Care, 53(10), pp. 1310–1315.
• Wang, L.W., Miller, M.J., Schmitt, M.R., Wen, F.K. (2013). Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Research in Social Administrative Pharmacy, 9, pp. 503–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.05.009
• Williams, A., Cunninghama, A., Hutchings, H., Harrisa, A., Evansa, D. (2022). Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The Surgeon. (In press).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.008
• Worrall, A., Connolly, M.J., O’Neill, A., O’ Doherty, M., Thornton, K., McNally, C…De Barra, E. (2020). Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries. BMC Public Health, 20, 1635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09710-5
• Yaqub, M., Ghezzi, P. (2015). Adding dimensions to the analysis of the quality of health information of websites returned by Google: cluster analysis identifies patterns of websites according to their classification and the type of intervention described. Frontiers in Public Health, 3, 204. 10.3389/fpubh.2015.0020
• Zellmer, C., Zimdars, P., Parker, S., Safdar, N. (2015). Evaluating the usefulness of patient education materials on surgical site infection: a systematic assessment. American Journal Infection Control, 43, pp. 167–168. 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.020
• Zhang, Y. (2012). Consumer health information searching process in real life settings. Proceeding of the Association for Information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 49, pp. 1–10. 10.1002/meet.14504901046
• Zhang, Y., Sun, Y. y Xie, B. (2015), Quality of health information for consumers on the web: A systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, pp. 2071–2084. 10.1002/asi.23311
• Zowalla, R., Pobiruchin, M., Weisner, M. (2018). Analyzing the readability of health information booklets on cardiovascular diseases. Stud Health Technol Inform, 253, pp. 16-20.