Bitcoin’s bubbly behaviors: does it resemble other financial bubbles of the past?

  1. Náñez Alonso, Sergio Luis 1
  2. Jorge-Vázquez, Javier 1
  3. Echarte Fernández, Miguel Ángel 1
  4. Sanz-Bas, David 2
  1. 1 DEKIS Research Group, Department of Economics, Faculty of Social and Legal Sciences. Catholic University of Ávila, Avila, Spain
  2. 2 GILM Research Group, Department of Economics, Faculty of Social and Legal Sciences. Catholic University of Ávila, Avila, Spain
Revista:
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

ISSN: 2662-9992

Ano de publicación: 2024

Volume: 11

Número: 1

Páxinas: 1-15

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1057/S41599-024-03220-0 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Resumo

A number of financial bubbles have occurred throughout history. The objective of this study was to identify the main similarities between Bitcoin price behavior during bubble periods and a number of historical bubbles. Once this had been carried out, we aimed to determine whether the solutions adopted in the past would be effective in the present to reduce investors’ risk in this digital asset. This study brings a new approach, as studies have previously been conducted analyzing the similarity of Bitcoin bubbles to other bubbles individually, but these were not conducted in such a broad manner, addressing different types of bubbles, and over such a broad time period. Starting from a dataset with 9967 records, a combined methodology was used. This consisted of an analysis of the standard deviations, the growth rates of the prices of the assets involved, the percentage increase in asset prices from the origin of the bubble to its peak and its fundamental value, and, finally, the bubble index. Lastly, correlation statistical analysis was performed. The results obtained from the combination of the above methods reveal the existence of certain similarities between the Bitcoin bubbles (2011, 2013, 2017, and 2021) and the tulip bubble (1634–1637) and the Mississippi bubble (1719–1720). We find that the vast majority of the measures taken to avoid past bubbles will not be effective now; this is due to the digital and decentralized nature of Bitcoin. A limitation of the study is the difficulty in making a comparison between bubbles that occurred at different historical points in time. However, the results obtained shed light and provide guidance on the actions to be taken by regulators to ensure the protection of investors in this digital asset.