La atención y la memoria como claves del proceso de aprendizaje.Aplicaciones para el entorno escolar

  1. Elena Bernabéu Brotóns 1
  1. 1 Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
    info

    Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ha64j07

Journal:
ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de investigación y docencia creativa

ISSN: 2254-5883

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: Monográfico sobre Neuropsicología

Volume: 6

Pages: 16-23

Type: Article

DOI: 10.30827/DIGIBUG.47141 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: ReiDoCrea: Revista electrónica de investigación y docencia creativa

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Attentional processes and mechanisms of memory are the main neuropsychological functions that support the learning processes. Their functioning must be the focus of study in the Neurodidactic domain. The application of appropriate strategies and methodologies, based on the knowledge of the neural systems involved in all these processes, leads to promote and improve the acquisition of knowledge in the academic field. This article reviews the main studies and methodological strategies that can be applied in classroom to increase academic performance and optimize learning processes.

Bibliographic References

  • Arango, J.C., Premuda, P. y Marquine M.J. (2006). Rehabilitación Cognitiva en personas con Traumatismo Craneoencefálico. En J.C. Arango (Ed.), Rehabilitación Neuropsicológica (pp.117-143). Ciudad de México: Manual Moderno.
  • Banich, M. y Compton, R. (2011). Cognitive Neuroscience. Belmont: Wadsworth.
  • Bird, M., y Kinsella, G. (1996). Long-term cued recall of tasks in senile dementia. Psychology and Aging, 11, 45-56.
  • Blackmore, S. y Frith, U. (2007). Cómo aprende el cerebro. Las claves para la educación. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Camargo, A., y Riveros, F. (2015). Efectos del estrés social agudo sobre la atención selectiva en estudiantes Universitarios. Informes Psicológicos, 15 y(2), 33- 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.18566/infpsicv15n2a02
  • Cohen, A., Ivry, R., I. y Keele, S., W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16(1), 17-30.
  • Craik, F. I. M., y Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,11, 671-684.
  • Craik, F. I. M., y Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.
  • Fuchs, A. F., Robinson, F. R., y Straube, A. (1993). Role of the caudal fastigial nucleus in saccade generation. I. Neuronal discharge patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 1723–1740.
  • Gazzaniga, M, Ivry, M.R, y Mangun, G.R. (2013). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. New York, W.W. Norton.
  • Gruber M.J. Gelman B.D. y, Ranganath C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486-496. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060
  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu Rev Psychol., 60, 653-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604.
  • Karpicke, J. D., y Blunt, J.R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science. DOI:10.1126/science.1199327
  • Kilgard M.P. y Merzenich M.M. (1998). Plasticity of temporal information processing in the primary auditory cortex. Nat Neurosci, 1(8),727-31
  • Lipinska B., Bäckman L., Mäntylä T. y Viitanen M. (1994). Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 16(6),809-19.
  • Llorente, C., Oca, J., Solana, A. y Ortiz, T (2012). Mejora de la atención y de áreas cerebrales asociadas en niños de edad escolar a través de un programa neurocognitivo. Participación Educativa, 47-58.
  • Lubinsky T., Rich J.B. y Anderson N.D. (2009). Errorless learning and elaborative self-generation in healthy older adults and individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: mnemonic benefits and mechanisms. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 15(5), 704-16. doi:0.1017/S1355617709990270
  • Multhaup, K. S., y Balota, D. A. (1997). Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in individuals with Dementia of the Alzheimer Type. Neuropsychology, 11, 382-391.
  • Ortiz, T. (2009). Neurociencia y Educación. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Pick, M.A, y Rawson, K.A. (2010). Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hyphotesis. Science, 330, 335.
  • Posner M.I, Petersen S.E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci., 13, 25-42.
  • Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, S.J. y Frith, U. (2011). Como aprende el cerebro. Las claves para la educación. Madrid, Ariel.
  • Schacter, D.L. (1987). Implicit memory: history and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13 (3),501-518.
  • Syka, J. y Merzenich, M.M. (2005). Plasticity and signal representation in the auditory system. New York, Springer.
  • Tudela, P. (1992). Atención. En J.L. Fernández Trespalacios y P. Tudela (coord.). Atención y percepción. Vol. 3 (pp. 119-163), en J. Mayor y J.L. Pinillos (eds.). Tratado de psicología general. Madrid: Alhambra.
  • Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M. y Houle, S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2016–2020.
  • Wagner, A. D., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H. y Gabrieli, J. (1998). Prefrontal cortex and recognition memory. Functional MRI evidence for contextdependent retrieval processes. Brain, 121, 1985-2002.
  • Winstanley P. y Bjork E.L. (1997). Processing instructions and the generation effect: a test of the multifactor transfer-appropriate processing theory. Memory, 5(3), 401-21.
Data source: Dialnet