Descolonización de la música en TikTok“¡Hagamos un dúo!”

  1. Vizcaíno-Verdú, Arantxa
Revista:
Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication

ISSN: 1989-872X

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 15

Número: 1

Páginas: 341-355

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/MEDCOM.24949 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

En la actualidad, redes sociales como TikTok están transformando el modo en que se expanden las narrativas musicales por el mundo. En esta aplicación de micro-vídeos eminentemente musicales, se comparten diariamente diversidad de contenidos creativos que no se alejan de los contextos socioculturales de sus usuarios. En este sentido, la plataforma facilita la creación de contenido “migrante” no occidental, integrando valores que reflejan el crecimiento cultural, social, rural y oriental. Con base en 510 dúos musicales generados por los usuarios de TikTok, este estudio explora cómo la plataforma potencia la descolonización de la industria musical, gobernada hasta entonces por estudios de grabación occidentales. Se desarrolla un análisis semiótico para explorar el contenido generado por el usuario en torno al reto #SingWithMe. Los resultados apuntan hacia un proceso de redescubrimiento y recuperación, sueño, compromiso y acción para la emancipación industrial. Se concluye que el dúo de TikTok es una herramienta clave que despierta una suerte de descentralización popular inconsciente dirigida por los usuarios.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este estudio ha sido financiado por el Ministerio de Universidades de España a través de la Ayuda del Programa de Formación de Profesorado Universitario (FPU) (REF. FPU18/00892), dentro del programa de Promoción del Talento y su Empleabilidad, en el marco del Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020 en I+D+i. Asimismo, el tiempo dedicado a esta investigación se engloba en los estudios de la ‘TikTok Cultures Research Network’ y el ‘Influencer Etnography Research Lab’ (IERLab) de la Curtin University (Australia).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abidin, C., & Kaye, D. B. V. (2021). Audio memes, earworms, and templatability: The ‘aural turn’ of memes on TikTok. In C. Arkenbout, J. Wilson, y D. De-Zeeuw (Eds.), Critical meme reader: Global mutations of the viral image (pp. 58-68). Institute of Network Cultures. https://bit.ly/3hqMQKu
  • Acey, C. E., Bouterse, S., Menking, A., Sengupta, A., & Vrana, A. G. (2021). Decolonizing the Internet by decolonizing ourselves: Challenging epistemic injustice through feminist practice. Global Perspectives, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.21268
  • Admadja, D. (2022). Juridical analysis of music uploaded on TikTok media in view of intellectual property law. International Asia of Law and Money Laundering, 1(3), 193-197. https://bit.ly/3YgavRO
  • Arrieta, A. (2021). ‘This audio has potential’: Platform lip-sync on TikTok. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 33(4), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1525/jpms.2021.33.4.5
  • Born, G., & Hesmondhalgh, D. (2000). Western music and its others: Difference, representation, and appropriation in music. University of California Press.
  • Carr, M. (2015). Power plays in global Internet governance. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 640-659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814562655
  • Collie, N., & Wilson-Barnao, C. (2020). Playing with TikTok: Algorithmic culture and the future of creative work. In G. Hearn (Ed.), The future of creative work (pp. 172-188). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839101106.00020
  • Coulter, A. (2022). Marketing agile artists: How music labels can leverage TikTok’s virality. Journal of the Music & Entertainment Industry Educators Association, 22(1), 135-156. https://doi.org/10.25101/22.5
  • Darvin, R. (2022). Design, resistance and the performance of identity on TikTok. Discourse, Context & Media, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100591
  • Dunn, K. (2012). 'We are the revolution': Riot Grrrl press, girl empowerment, and DIY self-publishing. Women's Studies, 41(2), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2012.636334
  • Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
  • Edmond, M. (2014). Here we go again: Music videos after YouTube. Television & New Media, 15(4), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476412465901
  • Gillespie, T. (2017). Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s Santorum problem. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1199721
  • Glïck, A. (2018). De-Westernization and decolonization in media studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.898
  • Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719897945
  • Guerrero-Pico, M., y Scolari, C. A. (2016). Narrativas transmedia y contenidos generados por los usuarios: El caso de los crossovers. Cuadernos.info, 38, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.38.760
  • Hesmondhalgh, D., Jones, E., & Rauh, A. (2019). SoundCloud and Bandcamp as alternative music platforms. Social Media + Society, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119883429
  • Hidalgo-Marí, T., & Sánchez-Olmos, C. (2016). Fanáticas en serie: YouTube, cultura participativa y series de televisión: Estudio comparativo de género. Cuadernos.info, 38, 149-164. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.38.733
  • Homer, M. (2009). Beyond the studio: The impact of home recording technologies on music creation and consumption. Nebula, 6(3), 85-99. https://bit.ly/3r8Ino9
  • Jaramillo-Dent, D., Alencar, A., & Asadchy, Y. (2022). #Migrantes on TikTok: Exploring platformed belongings. International Journal of Communication, 16, 5578-5602. https://bit.ly/3yy2jRv
  • Jaramillo-Dent, D., Contreras-Pulido, P., & Pérez-Rodríguez, A. (2022). Immigrant influencers on TikTok: Diverse microcelebrity profiles and algorithmic (in)visibility. Media and Communication, 10(1), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4743
  • Jarrett, K. (2008). Beyond Broadcast Yourself™: The future of YouTube. Media International Australia, 126(1), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0812600114
  • Jia, L., & Liang, F. (2021). The globalization of TikTok: Strategies, governance and geopolitics. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 12, 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00062_1
  • Jones, E. (2021). DIY music and the politics of social media. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501359675
  • Jones-Jang, S. M., & Chung, M. (2022). Can we blame social media for polarization? Counter-evidence against filter bubble calims during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099591
  • Kaye, D. B. V. (2022). Please duet this. Collaborative music making in lockdown on TikTok. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 15(1), 1-19. https://bit.ly/409AH1P
  • Karhade, P., Kathuria, A., Dasgupta, A., Malik, O., & Konsynski, B. (2021). Decolonization of digital platforms: A research agenda for great domains. In A. Garimella, P. Karhade, A. Kathuria, X. Liu, & J. Xu (Eds.), The role of e-business during the time of grand challenges (pp. 51-58). WeB: Workshop on E-Business. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79454-5_5
  • Laenui, P. (2006). Processes of decolonization. In M. A. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 150-160). UBC Press.
  • Leman, M. (2016). The expressive moment. How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment. The MIT Press.
  • Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2016). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
  • Ma, Y., & Hu, Y. (2021). Business model innovation and experimentation in transforming economies: ByteDance and TikTok. Management and Organization Review, 17(2), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.69
  • Meighan, P. J. (2021). Decolonizing the digital landscape: The role of technology in indigenous language revitalization. AlterNative, 17(3), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801211037672
  • Mirzoeff, N., & Halberstam, J. (2018). Decolonize media: Tactics, manifestos, histories. Cinema Journal, 57(4), 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2018.0054
  • Navarro-Güere, H. (2023). El vídeo em formato vertical. Una revisión de la literatura en comunicación. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación/Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 14(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.23028
  • Radovanović, B. (2022). TikTok and sound: Changing the ways of creating, promoting, distributing and listening to music. Journal of Contemporary Music, Art and Technology, 9, 51-73. https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2022.5.9.51
  • Rogers, H., Freitas, J., & Porfírio, J. F. (2023). YouTube and music. Online culture and everyday life. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501387302
  • Sanders-Pierce, C. (2006). The sign: Icon, index, and symbol. In S. Manghani, A. Piper, & J. Simons (Eds.), Images: A reader (pp. 107-109). Sage Publications.
  • Sadler, O. (2022). Defiant amplification or decontextualized commercialization? Protest music, TikTok, and social movements. Social Media + Society, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221094769
  • SensorTower. (2019). Top apps worldwide for September 2019 by Downloads. SensorTower. https://bit.ly/445vNnY
  • Shepard, T. (2019). Foreword. In M. Thurner (Ed.), The first wave of decolonization (pp. 7-11). Routledge.
  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can de subaltern speak? In C. Nelson, & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 66-111). Macmillan. https://bit.ly/437idPR
  • Syed-Mustafa, A. (2018). Prolegomenon to the decolonization of Internet governance. In D. Oppermann (Ed.), Internet governance in the global south: History, theory and contemporary debates (pp. 109-183). NUPRI. https://bit.ly/3WK59wz
  • Toffler, A. (1980). La tercera ola. Plaza & Janés.
  • Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., Aguaded, I., & Contreras-Pulido, P. (2021). Understanding transmedia music on YouTube through Disney storytelling. Sustainability, 13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073667
  • Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Abidin, C. (2022). Music challenge memes on TikTok: Understanding in-group storytelling videos. International Journal of Communication, 16(26), 883-908. https://bit.ly/3EkoQVU
  • Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., & Aguaded, I. (2022). #ThisIsMeChallenge and music for empowerment of marginalized groups on TikTok. Media and Communication, 10(1), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4715
  • Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., de-Casas-Moreno, P., & Tirocchi, S. (2023). Online prosumer convergence: Listening, creating and sharing music on YouTube and TikTok. Communication & Society, 36(1), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.1.151-166
  • Wang, Y. H., Gu, T. J., & Wang, S. L. (2019). Causes and characteristics of short video platform Internet-community taking the TikTok short video application as an example. In 6th IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
  • Webb-Gannon, C., & Webb, M. (2019). ‘More than a music, it’s a movement’: West Papua decolonization songs, social media, and the remixing of resistance. The Contemporary Pacific, 31(2), 309-343. https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2019.0025
  • Zeng, J., & Kaye, D. B. V. (2021). From content moderation to visibility moderation: A case study of platform governance on TikTok. Policy Internet, 14, 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.287
  • Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2020). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872-1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet