Reflexiones en torno a los principios generales de los «Victim impact statements»

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• ASHWORTH, A., «Victim impact statements and sentencing» en Criminal Law Review, 1993
• BONANNO, G. A., «Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events?» en American psychologist, 2004, vol. 59, n.o 1
• Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496, 509 ( 1987). No 86-520. Argued March 24, 1987 — Decided J u n e 1 5 , 1 9 8 7 . D i s p o n i b l e e n : http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep482/usrep482496/usrep482496.pdf [Última consulta: 25 de septiembre de 2019].
• BOPPRE, B., MILLER, M. K., «How victim and execution impact statements affect mock jurors» perceptions, emotions, and verdicts» en Victims & Offenders, 2014, vol. 9, n.o 4
• CHALMERS, J., DUFF, P. R., y LEVERICK, F. «Victim impact statements: Can work, do work (for those who bother to make them)» en Criminal Law Review, 2007
• DAVIS, R. C., «Victim/witness noncooperation: A second look at a persistent phenomenon» en Journal of Criminal Justice, 1983, vol. 11,
• DE MESMAECKER, V., «Antidotes to injustice? Victim statements» impact on victims» sense of security» en International review of victimology, 2012, vol. 18
• EREZ, E. y TONTODONATO, P., «The effect of victim participation in sentencing on sentence outcome» en Criminology, 1990, vol. 28, n.o 3
• EREZ, E., «Victim participation in sentencing: Rhetoric and reality» en Journal of Criminal Justice, 1990, vol . 18, no 1
• GORDON, T. M., BRODSKY, S. L., «The influence of victim impact statements on sentencing in capital cases» en Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2007 , vol. 7, n.o 2
• HENDERSON, L.N., «The wrongs of victim’s rights» en Standford Law Review, 1985, n.o 37,
• KELLY, D. P., «Victims» en Wayne Law Review, 1987, vol. 34
• KENNARD, K.L., «The victim’s veto: a way to increase victim impact on criminal case dispositions» en California Law Review, 1989, vol. 77
• LAYNE, C. M., WARREN, J. S., WATSON, P. K., y SHALEV, A. Y., «Risk, vulnerability, resistance and resilience: Toward an integrative conceptualization of posttraumatic adaptation», en FRIEDMAN, M. J., KEANE, T. M. y RESICK, P. A. (Eds.), Handbook of PSTD: Science and practice. Guilford Press , 2007
• LENS, K. M., PEMBERTON, A., BRANS, K., BRAEKEN, J., BOGAERTS, S., & LAHLAH, E., «Delivering a Victim Impact Statement: Emotionally effective or counter-productive?» en European Journal of Criminology, 2015, vol. 12, n.o 1
• LUGINBUHL, J., y BURKHEAD, M., «Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death» en American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1995, vol. 20, n.o 1
• MYERS, B. y GREENE, E., «The prejudicial nature of victim impact statements: Implications for capital sentencing policy» en Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2004, vol. 10, n.o 4
• MYERS, B. y GREENE, E., Op. Cit. (2004), pp. 494-497 y EISENBERG, T., GARVEY, S.P., WELLS, M.T., «Victim characteristics and victim impact evidence in South Carolina capital cases» en Cornell Law Review,2002, vol. 88
• NADLER, J. y ROSE, M.R., «Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment», en Cornell Law Review, 2002, vol. 88
• PATERNOSTER, R, y DEISE, J., «A heavy thumb on the scale: The effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making» en Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 49, N.o 1, 2011
• Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 830 (1991). No 90-5721. Argued April 24, 1991— Decided June 27, 1 9 9 1 . D i s p o n i b l e e n : http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep501/usrep501808/usrep501808.pdf [Última consulta: 25 de septiembre de 2019].
• RIMÉ, B., KANYANGARA, P., YZERBYT, V., & PAEZ, D., «The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide» en European Journal of Social Psychology , 2011, vol. 41, n.o 6
• ROBERTS, J. V. y EREZ, E., «Communication in sentencing: Exploring the expressive function of victim impact statements» en International review of Victimology, 2004, vol. 10, n.o 3
• SANDERS, A., HOYLE, C., MORGAN, R., y CAPE, E., «Victim impact statements: Don ’t work, can’t work» en Criminal Law Review, 2001
• SIJBRANDIJ, M., OLFF, M., REITSMA, J. B., CARLIER, I. V., y GERSONS, B. P., «Emotional or educational debriefing after psychological trauma: Randomised controlled trial» en The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2006, vol. 189, n.o 2
• SMALL, D. A., y LOEWENSTEIN, G., «Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability» en Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 2003, vol . 26, n.o 1
• South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805, 812 (1989). No 88-305. Argued March 28, 1989 — Decided J u n e 1 2 , 1 9 8 9 . D i s p o n i b l e e n: http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep490/usrep490805/usrep490805.pdf [Última consulta: 25 de septiembre de 2019].
• SULLIVAN, B. E., «Harnessing Payne: Controlling the admission of victim impact statements to safeguard capital sentencing hearings from passion and prejudice» en Fordham Urban Law Journal, 1997, vol. 25
• TALBERT, P.A., «The relevance of victim impact statements to the criminal sentencing decision» en UCLA Law Review., 1988, vol. 36
• TAMARIT SUMALLA, J. M. «La valoración judicial del impacto del delito en la víctima en casos de abuso sexual infantil» en Revista de Victimología, 2017, n.o 6
• VAN EMMERIK, A. A., KAMPHUIS, J. H., HULSBOSCH, A. M., Y EMMELKAMP, P. M., «Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: a meta-analysis» en The Lancet, 2002, vol. 360, n.o 9335