Autopercepción del ejercicio de liderazgo ético de dirigentes universitarios

  1. Unda, Sofía
Revue:
IJELM, International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management

ISSN: 2014-9018

Année de publication: 2016

Volumen: 4

Número: 2

Pages: 147-176

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17583/IJELM.2016.2164 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: IJELM, International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

.There is a clear shortage in academic research on ethical leadership, specially at an educational context, whatever its level. Therefore, it has been detected the need for an specific research on how university managers perceive themselves exercising their ethical leadership in such a context. In this sense, this work offers definite results obtained through the research developed in April 2013 with 31 university managers working in Social Councils, University Boards as well as other university teams, both at public and private national universities all over Spain.       These results have shown that their self-perceptions are basically supported by a possitive conception of their decisions. In fact, 20 out of 29 university managers interviewed have declared being totally aware of the integrity of their decision-making processes. They had been previously interviewed through semi-structured surveys whose contents have been analysed according to the ATLAS.ti.7 Programme.Finally, by means of a mixed-analytical strategy previous codes were defined and structured, in order to organize the answers given by the university managers, whilst new codes were emerging from the discussion. As a result, five general codes defining the appropiate categories for university managers self-perception were analyzed in detail: a) possitive self-perception,  b) possitive but partial self-perception, c) negative self-perception/cooperative, d) negative self-perception/leader and e) unable to self-perception.

Références bibliographiques

  • Ahmad, T. et al. (2009). The influence of ethical leadership on lectures’ job involvement. Journal Academy Leadership, 7 (3).
  • Ballester, LL. (2001). Bases metodológicas de la investigación educativa. Colecció materials didáctics. Palma: Universitat de Illes Balears.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Guía para la construcción de escalas de autoeficacia. Universidad de Stanford. Recuperado el 29 de junio de 2016 de http://ocw.unican.es/ciencias-de-la-salud/promocion-de-la-salud/otrosrecursos-1/guia-para-la-construccion-de-escalas-de
  • Best, J. W. (1982) (9ª edic.). Cómo investigar en educación. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
  • Bisquerra, R. (2000). Métodos de investigación educativa. Barcelona: Ceac, S.A.
  • Bonilla, V. E. y Alicea, A. (2010). Análisis de datos cualitativos. Centro para la excelencia académica. Facultad de Educación. Universidad de Puerto Rico. Recuperado en abril de 2013 de http://ceauprrp.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/0/1/10011830/analisis_de_datos_cualitativos.pdf
  • Bottery, M (1990). The morality of the school. The theory and practice of values in education. Londres: Cassell.
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo. London: Open University Press.
  • Guillén, M. y González, T. (2000). Necesidad de Liderazgo y su dimensión ética en la gestión de la calidad total. Cuaderns de Treball. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
  • Khuntia, R. y Suar, D. (2004). A scale to assess ethical leadership of indian private and public sectors managers. Journal of business ethics, 49(1), 13-26. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013853.80287.da
  • MCMillan, J. H y Schumacher, S. (2005) (5ª Edic.). Investigación educativa. Una introducción conceptual. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
  • Michavila, F. et al., (2015). El Gobierno de las Universidades. Reformas necesarias y tópicos manidos. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) (2ª edic). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications , Inc.
  • Solomon, R. C. (2000). Nuevas reflexiones acerca de las organizaciones de negocios. El éxito basado en la integridad de las personas. Oxford: University Press.
  • Treviño, L. K, Brown, M. E. & Pincus, L. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite”. Human relations, 56 (1), 5-37.
  • Treviño, L.K, Brown, M. E. & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical Leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Process, 97, 117-134.doi: 10.1177/0018726703056001448
  • Treviño, L. K. & Brown, M. E. (2006). Ethical Leadership: a review and future directions. The leadership Quaterly, 17 (6), 595-616. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
  • Unda, S. (2013a). Estudio sobre la autopercepción del ejercicio de liderazgo ético de dirigentes universitarios en España. Modelo Multidimensional y Concéntrico de Liderazgo Ético (MOMUCLE). Tesis Doctoral Inédita. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • Unda, S. (2013b). El liderazgo ético en la gestión de organizaciones educativas: una perspectiva multidimensional. En Gairín, J. (Dir.). Guía para la gestión de centros educativos (publicación online). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Valentine, S. et al. (2002). Ethical context, organizational commitment, and person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 41 (4), 349-360. doi: 10.1023/A:1021203017316
La source de données: Dialnet