El Comité de la CEDAW ante las comunicaciones individualesrequisitos de admisión y medidas provisionales
ISSN: 1697-5197
Ano de publicación: 2015
Número: 30
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)
Obxectivos de Desenvolvemento Sustentable
Resumo
Before the CEDAW Committee considers a Complaint on its merits or substance, it must be clear that the formal requirements of admissibility are met. This paper deals with the way in which this Committee has analyzed those requirements during the last 15 years. We intend to determine the existence of consolidated lines of analysis of these requirements and evaluate them; or, where appropriate, the existence of hesitations or progressive interpretations. In the same way we will study the cases in which the CEDAW Committee has requested interim measures, in order to determine, if it is possible, the existence behavior patterns by this Organ when adopting them, and even by States when following them, trying to give reasons for this behavior.
Referencias bibliográficas
- MURDOCH, J, “Unfulfilled Expectations: The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”, European Human Rights Law Review, 2010
- TARDU, nos habla de “petition recourse procedures” para referirse a las Comunicaciones a estos órganos (Véase al respecto: TARDU, M. E., Human Rights: in The International Petition System, Oceana, New York, 1985
- FLINTERMAN,C. “Draft Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women” NQHR, Vol. 13.1, 1995
- DOMINGUEZ MATÉS, R., “La presentación de Comunicaciones individuales ante el Comité para la Eliminación de la Discriminación Contra la Mujer como medio de tutela de la violencia de género a nivel internacional”, Portularia: Vol. 4, 2004
- BRANDT, M. y J.A. KAPLAN “The tension between women’s rights and religious rights: reservation to CEDAW by Egypt, Bangladesh and Tunisia”, 1995-1996
- CLARK, B. “The Viena Convention reservations regime and the Convention on Discrimination Against Women”, en American Journal of International Law, vol. 85, 1991, nº 2
- COOK, R. J. “Reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women”, en Virginia Journal of International Law, nº 30, 1990
- HODSON, L., “Women’s Rights and the Periphery: CEDAW’s Optional Protocol” European Journal of International Law, vol25, n 2
- DOMINGUEZ MATÉS, R., “La presentación de Comunicaciones individuales ante el Comité para la Eliminación de la Discriminación Contra la Mujer como medio de tutela de la violencia de género a nivel internacional”, Portularia: Vol. 4, 2004
- CHINCHON, ALVAREZ, A.: “La competencia ratione temporis del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos sobre la obligación de investigar (Art.2. Derecho a la vida) Teoría y práctica: de De Becker c. Bélgica a Canales Bermejo C. España “ REDI volumen LXVI, número 1, 2014
- MURDOCH, J., “Unfulfilled Expectations: The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women” European Journal of International Law, 1(2010)
- SANJOSÉ GIL, A., “La regla del agotamiento de los recursos internos en Derecho internacional general y en la Convención Europea de Derechos Humanos”. Revista general de derecho, Nº 511, 1987
- CHINCHÓN ÁLVAREZ, J. “Turquía y la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos sobre tortura: Algunas reflexiones tras los casos Getiren, Kemal Kahraman, Osman Karademir, Osmanoğlu, y Balçik y otros, contra Turquía” Revista De Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 2009, 13(33)
- MURDOCH, J., “Unfulfilled Expectations: The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”, European Human Rights Law Review, 2010
- HODSON L., “Women’s Rights and the Periphery: CEDAW’s Optional Protocol” European Journal of International Law, Vol 25, n, 2014
- NGUYEN, A., Through the Eyes of Women? The Jurisprudence of the Cedaw Committee. The Jurisprudence of the CEDAW Committee”, Outskirts, May 2014
- BUTTERLY L., “An analysis of the effectiveness ovf te Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women 1979 and its Optional Protocol as regard the protection of women who suffer domestic violence” Westminster Law Review, Vol 4.1, 2014