Evaluación de servicios ecosistémicos mediante la coparticipación de stakeholdersuna retrospectiva para el caso de los bosques

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Alba-Patiño, D., Carabassa, V., Castro, H., Gutiérrez-Briceño, I., García-Llorente, M., Giagnocavo, C., ... y Castro, A. J. (2021). Social indicators of ecosystem restoration for enhancing human wellbeing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 174, 105782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105782
• Asah, S. T. y Blahna, D. J. (2020). Involving Stakeholders’ knowledge in co-designing social valuations of biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for decision-making. Ecosystems, 23(2), 324-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00405-6
• Aznar-Sánchez, J. A. y Velasco-Muñoz, J. F. (2016). Valoración de los ecoservicios en los agroecosistemas españoles: un estado de la cuestión. Observatorio Medioambiental, 19, 165-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/OBMD.54166
• Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., López-Serrano, M. J. y Velasco-Muñoz, J. F. (2018a). Forest ecosystem services: An analysis of worldwide research. Forests, 9(8), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080453
• Aznar-Sánchez, J.A., Belmonte-Ureña, L.J., Velasco-Muñoz, J.F., Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018b). Economic analysis of sustainable water use: A review of worldwide research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1120-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.066
• Balmford, A. y Bond, W. (2005). Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well‐being. Ecology letters, 8(11), 1218-1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00814.x
• Bidegain, Í., López-Santiago, C. A., González, J. A., Martínez-Sastre, R., Ravera, F., y Cerda, C. (2020). Social Valuation of Mediterranean Cultural Landscapes: Exploring Landscape Preferences and Ecosystem Services Perceptions through a Visual Approach. Land, 9(10), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9100390
• Caballero-Serrano, V., Alday, J. G., Amigo, J., Caballero, D., Carrasco, J. C., McLaren, B., y Onaindia, M. (2017). Social perceptions of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Human Ecology, 45(4), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745--9921-6
• Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., ... y Whyte, A. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(5), 1305-1312. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808772106
• Castillo, A., Magaña, A., Pujadas, A., Martínez, L., y Godínez, C. (2005). Understanding the interaction of rural people with ecosystems: a case study in a tropical dry forest of Mexico. Ecosystems, 8(6), 630-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0127-1
• Castro, A. J., Vaughn, C. C., Julian, J. P., y García‐Llorente, M. (2016). Social demand for ecosystem services and implications for watershed management. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 52(1), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12379
• Chan, K. M., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., ... y Woodside, U. (2012a). Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience, 62(8), 744-756. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
• Chan, K. M., Satterfield, T. y Goldstein, J. (2012b). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological economics, 74, 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
• Ciftcioglu, G. C. (2020). Using a combination of Q-methodology and survey-based approach for assessing forest ecosystem services of Five Finger Mountains in Northern Cyprus. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1789-1805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00824-8
• Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., ... y Van Den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
• Crivellaro, M., Maurizio, C., Giacomo, C., Marco, B., y Alessandro, P. (2020). A social assessment of forest resource based on stakeholders’ perception: an application in three Balkans rural areas. Journal of Forest Research, 25(5), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2020.1782554
• Cuni-Sánchez, A., Ngute, A. S. K., Sonké, B., Sainge, M. N., Burgess, N. D., Klein, J. A. y Marchant, R. (2019). The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon. Ecosystem Services, 40, 101000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101000
• Daily, G. C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Pejchar, L., ... y Shallenberger, R. (2009). Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1890/080025
• Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M., ... y Von der Dunk, A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(23), 8812-8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109
• De Groot, R. (2006). Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 75(3-4), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
• De Meo, I., Cantiani, M. G., Ferretti, F., y Paletto, A. (2018). Qualitative assessment of forest ecosystem services: The stakeholders’ point of view in support of landscape planning. Forests, 9(8), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080465
• Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., ... y Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270-272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
• Do Rosario, I. T., Rebelo, R., Caser, U., Vasconcelos, L., y Santos-Reis, M. (2019). Valuation of ecosystem services by stakeholders operating at different levels: insights from the Portuguese cultural montado landscape. Regional Environmental Change, 19(8), 2173-2185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01527-2
• Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F. y Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments - Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.004
• Garrido, P., Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Plieninger, T., Pulido, F., y Moreno, G. (2017). Stakeholder perspectives of wood-pasture ecosystem services: A case study from Iberian dehesas. Land Use Policy, 60, 324-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.022
• Gavel, Y. y Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958
• González-Yebra, Ó., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., y López-Felices, B. (2023). A methodological proposal for the sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services. Agric. Econ.–Czech, 69, 68-77. https://doi.org/10.17221/298/2022-AGRICECON
• Gusmão-Caiado, R.G., de Freitas-Dias, R., Veiga-Mattos, L., Gonçalves-Quelhas, O.L., Leal- Filho, W. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of ecoefficiency - A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 890-904.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166
• Haines-Young, R. y Potschin-Young, M. (2018). Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5. 1): a policy brief. One Ecosystem, 3, e27108. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
• Hough, M., Pavao-Zuckerman, M. A., y Scott, C. A. (2018). Connecting plant traits and social perceptions in riparian systems: Ecosystem services as indicators of thresholds in social ecohydrological systems. Journal of Hydrology, 566, 860-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.005
• Huang, Z., Jing, Z., Bai, Y., y Fang, Z. (2022). Does Public Environmental Education and Advocacy Reinforce Conservation Behavior Value in Rural Southwest China?. Sustainability, 14(9), 5505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095505
• Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P. A., Montes, C., y Martín-López, B. (2014). Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecological economics, 108, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028
• Kitchenham, B.A. y Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University.
• Lhoest, S., Dufrene, M., Vermeulen, C., Oszwald, J., Doucet, J. L., y Fayolle, A. (2019). Perceptions of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests to local populations in Cameroon. Ecosystem Services, 38, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100956
• Liquete, C., Piroddi, C., Drakou, E. G., Gurney, L., Katsanevakis, S., Charef, A. y Egoh, B. (2013). Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. PloS one, 8(7), e67737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067737
• Lyytimäki, J. y Pitkänen, K. (2020). Perceived wellbeing effects of ecosystems in Finland. Human Ecology, 48(3), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-020-00155-3
• Maestre-Andrés, S., Calvet-Mir, L., y Van Den Bergh, J. C. (2016). Sociocultural valuation of ecosystem services to improve protected area management: a multi-method approach applied to Catalonia, Spain. Regional Environmental Change, 16(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0784-3
• Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D. G. D., ... y Montes, C. (2012). Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS one, 7(6), e38970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
• McDonough, K., Hutchinson, S., Moore, T. y Hutchinson, J. S. (2017). Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research. Ecosystem Services, 25, 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.022
• Mensah, S., Veldtman, R., Assogbadjo, A. E., Ham, C., Kakaï, R. G., y Seifert, T. (2017). Ecosystem service importance and use vary with socio-environmental factors: A study from household-surveys in local communities of South Africa. Ecosystem Services, 23, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.018
• Millennium ecosystem assessment, MEA (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5, pp. 563-563). Washington, DC: Island press.
• Mongeon, P. y Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015- 1765-5
• Nieto-Romero, M., Oteros-Rozas, E., González, J. A. y Martín-López, B. (2014). Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: insights for future research. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.003
• Pastorella, F., Giacovelli, G., Maesano, M., Paletto, A., Vivona, S., Veltri, A., ... y Mugnozza, G. S. (2016). Social perception of forest multifunctionality in southern Italy: The case of Calabria Region. Journal of Forest Science, 62(8), 366-379. https://doi.org/10.17221/45/2016-JFS
• Paudyal, K., Baral, H., y Keenan, R. J. (2018). Assessing social values of ecosystem services in the Phewa Lake Watershed, Nepal. Forest policy and economics, 90, 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.011
• Peter, S., Le Provost, G., Mehring, M., Müller, T., y Manning, P. (2021). Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany. People and Nature 4(1), 218-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10277
• Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E. y Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land use policy, 33, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
• Rodríguez-Morales, B., Roces-Díaz, J. V., Kelemen, E., Pataki, G., y Díaz-Varela, E. (2020). Perception of ecosystem services and disservices on a peri-urban communal forest: Are landowners’ and visitors’ perspectives dissimilar?. Ecosystem Services, 43, 101089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101089
• Santiago, L. E., Forero-Montaña, J., Melendez-Ackerman, E. J., Gould, W. A., & Zimmerman, J. K. (2022). Social Acceptability of a Sustainable Forestry Industry in Puerto Rico: Views of Private, Public, and Non-Profit Sectors. Forests, 13(4), 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040576
• Schaich, H., Bieling, C. y Plieninger, T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(4), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.19.4.9
• Scholte, S. S., Van Teeffelen, A. J. y Verburg, P. H. (2015). Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods. Ecological economics, 114, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007
• Seppelt, R., Dormann, C. F., Eppink, F. V., Lautenbach, S. y Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of applied Ecology, 48(3), 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2010.01952.x
• Shrestha, K., Shakya, B., Adhikari, B., Nepal, M., y Shaoliang, Y. (2023). Ecosystem services valuation for conservation and development decisions: A review of valuation studies and tools in the Far Eastern Himalaya. Ecosystem Services, 61, 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101526
• Sotelo Navalpotro, J.A. (1998). Los contextos de la Política Ambiental Española actual: adaptación del Quinto Programa de la UE, Observatorio Medioambiental., nº 1,pp.127-140
• Sotelo Navalpotro, José Antonio (1998). Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo en la España de los noventa: la problemática regional de los residuos tóxicos y peligrosos, Anales de Geografía de la UCM., nº 18., pp. 257-280. Tamames, R. (1 977): Ecología y Desarrollo. Madrid. Alianza Editorial.
• Sotelo Navalpotro, J.A. (1999). ¿Educación Ambiental con Mayúsculas? Notas para la reflexión. Observatorio medioambiental, ISSN 1139-1987, Nº 2, págs. 59-80
• Sotelo Pérez, M. y Sotelo Navalpotro, J.A. (2019). La contaminación atmosférica y su impacto sobre las actividades turísticas, en Madrid. Cuadernos de turismo, nº. 44, págs. 381-411
• Sotelo Pérez, M., Sotelo Pérez, I., Sotelo Navalpotro, J.A. (2020). Dimensión y contextos ambientales del agua: la Agenda 2030. Observatorio medioambiental, nº 23, pp. 83-108
• TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. London: Earthscan.
• Tovar-Tique, Y. P., Escobedo, F. J., y Clerici, N. (2021). Community-based importance and quantification of ecosystem services, disservices, drivers, and neotropical dry forests in a rural colombian municipality. Forests, 12(7), 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070919
• Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Schoenemann, M., y López-Felices, B. (2022). An Analysis of the Worldwide Research on the Socio-Cultural Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services. Sustainability, 14(4), 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042089
• Vihervaara, P., Rönkä, M. y Walls, M. (2010). Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. Ambio, 39(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x
• Wang, B., Tang, H., y Xu, Y. (2017). Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices: Insights from a mountain-basin area, China. Ecosystem services, 27, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.018
• Wegner, G. y Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 492-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.008
• Zabavnik, D. y Verbic, M. (2021). Relationship between the financial and the real economy: A bibliometric analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 75, 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.04.014
• Zimmermann-Teixeira, F., Bachi, L., Blanco, J., Zimmermann, I., Welle, I., y Carvalho- Ribeiro, S. M. (2019). Perceived ecosystem services (ES) and ecosystem disservices (EDS) from trees: insights from three case studies in Brazil and France. Landscape Ecology, 34(7), 1583-1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00778-y