Ensamblajes domésticos, infancia temprana y medios digitales

  1. David Poveda 1
  2. Mitsuko Matsumoto 2
  3. Cristina Aliagas 3
  4. Daniel Vázquez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

  2. 2 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  3. 3 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/052g8jq94

Revista:
Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

ISSN: 1578-8946

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 23

Número: 3

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.3344 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

Resumen

En este artículo introducimos el constructo de ensamblaje doméstico como herramienta conceptual para comprender las prácticas digitales de la primera infancia en el hogar. Nuestra propuesta se nutre de una perspectiva ecológica del desarrollo humano y de los estudios de la ciudad desde la Teoría del Actor-Red. Discutimos el recorrido conceptual de nuestra propuesta, así como las ventajas y limitaciones del concepto a partir de tres casos recogidos dentro del estudio del estado español “Un Día en la Vida Digital de la Infancia 0-3”. Utilizamos los materiales empíricos de esta investigación, que tiene como eje la grabación en vídeo de un día completo de la vida de un niño/a de 0-3 años, para discutir dos recorridos analíticos: partir del dispositivo para reconstruir los ensamblajes domésticos o partir de las rutinas para desentrañar cómo se ensamblan en relación con las tecnologías digitales del hogar.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aarsand, Päl (2016). Children’s media practices: Challenges and dilemmas for the qualitative researcher. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121894
  • Aliagas, Cristina; Matsumoto, Mitsuko; Morgade, Marta; Correro, Cristina; Galera, Nieves & Poveda, David (2017). Young children (0-8) and digital technology – What changes in one year? (Spain National Report). Papers Infancia_c, 20, 1-65. https://www.infanciacontemporanea.com/2017/10/26/jrc082ndreport/
  • Alper, Meryl (2018). Inclusive sensory ethnography: Studying new media and neurodiversity in everyday life. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3560-3579. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755394
  • Alper, Meryl (2019). Portables, luggables, and transportables: Historicizing the imagined affordances of mobile computing. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(3), 322-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918813694
  • American Academy of Pediatrics - Council on Communications and Media (2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591
  • Arnott, Lorna (2016). An ecological exploration of young children’s digital play: framing children’s social experiences with technologies in early childhood. Early Years, 36(3), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1181049
  • Baird, Kelly (2013). Exploring a methodology with young children: Reflections on using the Mosaic and Ecocultural approaches. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911303800107
  • Baltes, Paul; Reese, Hayne & Lipsitt, Lewis (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.000433
  • Bartlett, Lesley & Vavrus, Frances (2016). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Routledge.
  • Bloome, David & Carter, Stephanie (2014). Microethnographic discourse analysis. En Peggy Albers, Teri Holbrook & Amy Flint (Eds.), New methods in literacy research (pp. 3-18). Routledge.
  • Chaudron, Stephane (2015). Young children (0-8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/111111111/33897
  • Chaudron, Stephane; Di Gioia, Rossana & Gemo, Monica (2018). Young children (0-8) and digital technology: A qualitative study across Europe (JRC Science for Policy Reports). European Comission. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC110359
  • Cieraard, Irene (2006). Introduction: Anthropology at home. En Irene Cieraard (Ed.), At home: An anthropology of domestic space (pp. 1-12). Syracuse University Press.
  • Cowan, Kate (2014) Multimodal transcription of video: examining interaction in early years classrooms. Classroom Discourse, 5(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2013.859846
  • Danby, Susan; Fleer, Marilyn; Davidson, Christina & Hatzigianni, Maria (2018). Digital childhoods across contexts and countries. En Susan Danby, Marilyn Fleer, Christina Davidson & Maria Hatzigiann (Eds.), Digital childhoods: Technologies and children’s everyday lives (pp. 1-14). Springer Nature.
  • Davies, Julia (2004). Negotiating femininities online. Gender and Education, 16(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000170327
  • D’heer, Evelien & Courtois, Cédric (2016). The changing dynamics of television consumption in the multimedia living room. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514543451
  • Dynel, Marta (2011). Revisiting Goffman’s postulates on participant statuses in verbal interaction. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(7), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00286.x
  • Ergler, Christina; Kearns, Robin; Witten, Karen. & Porter, Gina (2016). Digital methodologies and practices in children’s geographies. Children’s Geographies, 14(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1129394
  • Erickson, Frederick (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. En Judith Green, Gregory Camili & Patricia Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-192). Lawrence Earlbaum / American Educational Research Association.
  • Erstad, Ola & Gillen, Julia (2020). Theorizing digital literacy practices in early childhood. En Ola Erstad, Rosie Flewitt, Bettina Kümmerling-Meibauer & Íris Pereira (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood (pp. 31-44). Routledge.
  • Farías, Ignacio (2011). Ensamblajes urbanos: la TAR y el examen de la ciudad. Athenea Digital, 11(1), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v11n1.826
  • Farías, Ignacio & Bender, Thomas (Eds.) (2010). Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. Routledge
  • Feixa, Carles (2005). La habitación de los adolescentes. Papeles del CEIC. International Journal on Collective Identity Research, 16, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1387/pceic.12125
  • Flewitt, Rosie & Clark, Alison (2020). Porous boundaries: Reconceptualising the home literacy environment as a digitally networked space for 0–3 year olds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(3), 447-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420938116
  • Fung, Michelle; Rojas, Erik & Delgado, Liseth (2020). Impacto del tiempo de pantalla en la salud de niños y adolescentes. Revista Médica Sinergia, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.31434/rms.v5i6.370
  • Galera, Nieves (2021). Comunidades de práctica y rutinas en familias con bebés. ETNIA-E: Cuadernos de Investigación Etnográfica sobre Infancia, Adolescencia y Educación del IMA / FMEE, 18, 1-73. https://www.academia.edu/62693850/No_18_Noviembre_2021_Comunidades_de_Pr%C3%A1ctica_y_Rutinas_en_Familias_con_Beb%C3%A9s_Nieves_Galera
  • Galera, Nieves; Matsumoto, Mitsuko & Poveda, David (2016). The place of digital devices in the home and family routines of young children (3-7) in Madrid. Media Education: Studi, Ricerche, Boune Pratiche, 7(2), 303-319. https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/med/article/view/8764
  • Galman, Sally (2016). The good, the bad, and the data: Shane the lone ethnographer’s basic guide to qualitative data analysis. Routledge.
  • Gershon, Iliana (2010). Media ideologies: An introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(2), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01070.x
  • Gillen, Julia & Cameron, Catherine (2010). International perspectives on early childhood research: A day in the life. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gillen, Julia; Matsumoto, Mitsuko; Aliagas, Cristina; Bar-lev, Yehuda; Clark, Alison; Flewitt, Rosie; Jorge, Ana; Kumpulainen, Kristiina; Morgade, Marta; Pacheco, Raquel; Poveda, David; Sandberg, Helena; Sairanen, Heidi; Scott, Fiona; Sjöberg, Ulrika; Sundin, Ebba; Tigane, Ilham & Tomé, Victor (2018). A Day in the Digital Lives of Children Aged 0-3: Final Report. DigiLitEY COST Action 1410 Working Group 1: Digital Literacy in Homes and Communities. https://www.infanciacontemporanea.com/2019/03/10/a-day-in-the-digital-lives-of-children-aged-0-3-final-report/
  • Gómez, Paula (2019). Ensamblajes, topologías, identidades y juegos performativos: Exploraciones multimodales de la ciudad con niñas y niños bubis en el área metropolitana sur de Madrid. Trabajo de Fin de Máster, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • González-Patiño, Javier (2011). Rutinas de la infancia urbana mediadas por la tecnología: Un análisis visual. Papeles de Trabajo sobre Cultura, Educación y Desarrollo Humano, 7(2), 1-16. https://revistas.uam.es/ptcedh/article/view/9865
  • Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie (2004). Participation. En Alessandro Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222-244). Blackwell.
  • Hackett, Abigail & Sommerville, Margaret (2017). Posthuman literacies: Young children moving in time, place and more-than-human worlds. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 374-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417704031
  • Henrich, Joseph; Heine, Steven & Norenzayan, Ara (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
  • Kirkorian, Heather; Pempek, Tiffany; Murphy, Lauren; Schmidt, Marie & Anderson, Daniel (2009). The impact of background television on parent–child interaction. Child Development, 80(5), 1350-1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01337.x
  • Kumpulainen, Kristiina & Gillen, Julia (2017). Young children’s digital literacy practices in the home: A review of the literature. COST Action ISI1410 DigiLitEY Report. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/229241
  • Latour, Bruno (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369-381. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163
  • Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Lave, Jean & Wenger, Etienne (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lincoln, Sian (2016). Bedroom culture: A review of research. En Karen Nairn & Peter Kraftl (Eds.), Space, place, and environment. Geographies of children and young people (pp. 421-439). Springer Nature.
  • Livingstone, Sonia (2007). From family television to bedroom culture: Young people’s media at home. En Eoin Devereux (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 302-321). Sage.
  • Madigan Sheri; Browne, Dillon; Racine, Nicole; Mori, Camille & Tough, Suzanne (2019). Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(3), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056
  • Marsh, Jackie (2020). Researching the digital literacy and multimodal practices of young children: a European agenda for change. En Ola Erstad, Rosie Flewitt, Bettina Kümmerling-Meibauer & Íris Pereira (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood (pp. 19-30). Routledge.
  • Matsumoto, Mitsuko; Poveda, David; Jorge, Ana; Pacheco, Raquel; Tomé, Victor; Aliagas, Cristina & Morgade, Marta (2021). Family mediating practices and ideologies: Spanish and Portuguese parents of children under three and digital media in homes. En Donell Holloway, Michele Wilson, Karen Murcia, Catherine Archer & Francesca Stocco (Eds.), Young children’s rights in a digital world: Play, design and practice (pp. 29-44). Springer.
  • McRobbie, Angela & Garber, Jenny (1976). Girls and subcultures. En Stuart Hall & Tony Jefferson (Eds.), Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain (pp. 209-223). Hutchinson.
  • Morgade, Marta; Aliagas, Cristina & Poveda, David (2020). Reconceptualizing the home of digital childhood. En Ola Erstad, Rosie Flewitt, Bettina Kümmerling-Meibauer & Íris Pereira (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital literacies in early childhood (pp. 109-122). Routledge.
  • Navarro, Jessica & Tudge, Jonathan (2022). Technologizing Bronfenbrenner: Neo-ecological theory. Current Psychology (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02738-3
  • Neal, Jennifer & Neal, Zachary (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722-737. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12018
  • Norris, Sigrid (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.
  • Ochs, Elinor; Solomon, Olga & Sterponi, Laura (2005). Limitations and transformations of habitus in child-directed communication. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 547-583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054406
  • Pink, Sarah; Mackley, Kerstin; Morosanu, Roxana; Mitchell, Val & Bhamra, Tracy (2017). Making homes: Ethnography and design. Bloomsbury.
  • Plowman, Lydia (2016). Rethinking context: Digital technologies and children’s everyday lives. Children’s Geographies, 14(2), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1127326
  • Poveda, David (2020). Researching digital literacy practices in early childhood: Challenges, complexities and imperatives. En Ola Erstad, Rosie Flewitt, Bettina Kümmerling-Meibauer & Íris Pereira (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Digital Literacies in Early Childhood (pp. 45-63). Routledge.
  • Poveda, David; Casla, Marta; Messina, Claudia; Morgade, Marta; Rujas, Irene; Pulido, Laura & Cuevas, Isabel (2007). The after school routines of literature-devoted urban children. Children’s Geographies, 5(4), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280701631890
  • Poveda, David; Matsumoto, Mitsuko; Sundin, Ebba; Sandberg, Helena; Aliagas, Cristina & Gillen, Julia (2020). Space and practices: Engagement of children under 3 with tablets and TVs in homes in Spain, Sweden and England. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(3), 500-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420923715
  • Poveda, David; Morgade, Marta & González-Patiño, Javier (2012). Children at home in Madrid. ETNIA-E: Cuadernos de Investigación Etnográfica sobre Infancia, Adolescencia y Educación del IMA/FMEE, 4, 1-15. https://www.academia.edu/9500988/No_4_Octubre_2012_Children_at_home_in_Madrid_David_Poveda_Marta_Morgade_y_Javier_Gonz%C3%A1lez_Pati%C3%B1o
  • Scott, Fiona (2022). Family mediation of preschool children’s digital media practices at home. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1960859
  • Tudge, Jonathan; Doucet, Fabienne; Odero, Dolphine; Sperb, Tania; Piccinini, Cesar & Lopes, Rita (2006). A window into different cultural worlds: Young children’s everyday activities in the United States, Brazil, and Kenya. Child Development, 77(5), 1446-1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00947.x
  • Valentine, Gill (2008). The ties that bind: Towards geographies of intimacy. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2097-2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00158.x
  • Venkatesh, Alladi (2006). Introduction to the Special Issue on “ICT in everyday life: Home and personal environments”. The Information Society, 22(4), 191-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600791317