Pre and post-pandemic perception of sciencea case study upon scientific communication in secondary education didactics

  1. Dorca-Fornell, Carmen 1
  2. Nieto-Márquez, Natalia Lara 2
  3. Gómez-Sebastián, Silvia 3
  4. Josa Prado, Fernando 4
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universidad Camilo José Cela
    info

    Universidad Camilo José Cela

    Villanueva de la Cañada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03f6h9044

  3. 3 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

  4. 4 Asoc. Científicos Retornados a España
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Hachetetepé: Revista científica de Educación y Comunicación

ISSN: 2172-7929

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Preprint

Número: 27

Páginas: 2205

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.25267/HACHETETEPE.2023.I27.2205 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Hachetetepé: Revista científica de Educación y Comunicación

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

A percepção social da ciência é um conceito multifacetado que ajuda a compreender as relações em evolução entre o ecossistema do conhecimento e as opiniões e pontos de vista públicos/cidadãos sobre ele. A comunicação científica, um aspecto chave, consiste num fluxo de informação dos profissionais da ciência, investigação e inovação para a sociedade civil, contribuindo para moldar as suas conceções/opiniões. No âmbito de uma atividade de divulgação entre cientistas e centros educacionais do ensino secundário, analisamos o efeito da comunicação científica como metodologia didática. Hipotetizamos qual seria o efeito da pandemia na perceção da ciência dos estudantes. Para estudá-la, utilizamos uma metodologia quantitativa longitudinal por grupos e avaliamos as mudanças na perceção da ciência através de um inquérito de opinião recolhido em dois momentos temporais: pré-pandemia e pós-pandemia. Os resultados demonstraram que a COVID-19 influenciou positivamente o interesse pela ciência. Curiosamente, os estudantes perderam confiança na integridade científica devido à falta de transparência nas notícias científicas nos inquéritos pós-pandemia. Estes resultados sugerem a necessidade de acesso a informações claras e cientificamente validadas para aumentar a perceção social positiva deste estrato da sociedade.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baig, M. I., Shuib, L., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2021). E-learning adoption in higher education: A review. Information Development, 38(4), 570-588. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211008224
  • Botella, C., López-Iñesta, E., Rueda, S., Forte, A., De Ves, E., Benavent García, X., & Marzal, P. (2020, 2020). Iniciativas contra la brecha de género en STEM. Una guía de buenas prácticas http://hdl.handle.net/10045/125239
  • Bridgman, A., Merkley, E., Loewen, P. J., Owen, T., Ruths, D., Teichmann, L., & Zhilin, O. (2020, 2020/06/18). The causes and consequences of COVID-19 misperceptions: Understanding the role of news and social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-028
  • Dahlstrom, E. K., Bell, C., Chang, S., Lee, H. Y., Anderson, C. B., Pham, A., Pribbenow, C. M., &
  • Cameron, C. A. (2022). Translating mentoring interventions research into practice: Evaluation of an evidence-based workshop for research mentors on developing trainees' scientific communication skills. PloS one, 17(2), e0262418-e0262418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262418
  • Davis, R., & D'Lima, D. (2020). Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives. Implementation science: IS, 15(1), 97-97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01051-6
  • de Semir, V. (2016). La Divulgación Científica. Editorial UOC. https://acortar.link/MGnFrD
  • Díaz, I., & García, M. (2011). Más Allá del Paradigma de la Alfabetización: La Adquisición de Cultura
  • Científica como Reto Educativo. Formación universitaria, 4(2), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062011000200002
  • European Commission Directorate-General for Research & Innovation, Iagher, R., Monachello, R., Warin, C., Delaney, N., & Tornasi, Z. (2020). Science with and for society in Horizon 2020 : achievements and recommendations for Horizon Europe. Publications Office. https://doi.org/doi/10.2777/32018
  • FECYT. (2019). Percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología en España 2018. F. E. d. C. y. T. (FECYT). https://acortar.link/WQ3rMK
  • FECYT. (2021). Encuestas de percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología - 2020. F. E. d. C. y. T. (FECYT). https://acortar.link/WQ3rMK
  • FECYT. (2023). Encuestas de percepción social de la ciencia y la tecnología - 2022. F. E. d. C. y. T. (FECYT). https://acortar.link/WQ3rMK
  • Galvao, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C., Ferreira, J., & Ratten, V. (2019, 2019/10/02). Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 812-833. https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-10-2018-0103
  • García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The Transformation of Higher Education After the COVID Disruption: Emerging Challenges in an Online Learning Scenario.
  • Frontiers in psychology, 12, 616059-616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059
  • Hurlbut, A. R. (2018). Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1509265
  • Iyengar, S., & Massey, D. S. (2019). Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(16), 7656-7661. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805868115
  • Leontiev, A. N., & Luria, A. R. (2005). The Problem of the Development of the Intellect and Learning in Human Psychology. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 43(4), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2005.11059257
  • Lozada, M. J. (2022). La relación entre pensamiento y lenguaje desde la perspectiva sociocultural. In Lenguaje, pensamiento y consrucción del conocimiento (pp. 29-36). Editorial de la UNLP. https://acortar.link/O6KLoO
  • Martinez Mendoza, J. R., & Nieto Navarro, J. (2013). La Ciencia en el Bar: una propuesta de debate cordial sobre las nanociencias. Revista Digital Universitaria, 14(4), 1067- 6079. https://acortar.link/FlgAXO
  • Matthews, M. R. (1998). Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical
  • Examination (pp. 1-10). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3_1
  • Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020, 2020/03/24). Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Use of Role Playing and Educational Video in Future Teachers’ Training. Sustainability, 12(6), 2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062558
  • Navarro Zamora, L. (2021). Comunicación de la Ciencia en la pandemia por COVID-19 y sus divulgadores. Emerging Trends in Education, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.19136/etie.a4n7.4456
  • Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
  • Parra-González, M. E., López Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., & Fuentes Cabrera, A. (2020). Active and Emerging Methodologies for Ubiquitous Education: Potentials of Flipped Learning and Gamification. Sustainability, 12(2), 602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020602
  • Peris-Ortiz, M., Ferreira, J. J., Farinha, L., & Fernandes, N. O. (2016). Introduction to Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. J. Ferreira, L. Farinha, & N. O. Fernandes (Eds.), Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness (pp. 1-13). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29677-7_1
  • Rieber, R. W., & Carton, A. S. (1987). The Development of Scientific Concepts in Childhood. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of General Psychology, Including the Volume Thinking and Speech (pp. 167-241). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1655-8_9
  • Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., Banelyte, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., Pisacane, L., Ruggieri, R., Sifacaki, E., & Vignoli, M. (2020). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS
  • Comput Biol, 16(4), e1007704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007704
  • Sánchez Fundora, Y., & Roque García, R. (2011). La divulgación científica: Una herramienta eficaz en centros de investigación. Bibliotecas: Reseñas y reflexiones, 7, 91–94. https://acortar.link/DJDSAw
  • Sánchez Mejía, L., González Abril, J., & García Martínez, Á. (2013). La argumentación en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, 9(1), 11-28. https://acortar.link/QzQyKM
  • Shaikh, R. (2011). Vygotsky and Socio-cultural Roots of Scientific Reasoning. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5090.0968
  • Soria, L., & Giner Gomis, A. (2021). Percepción docente de la naturaleza de la escucha pedagógica e implementación de las relaciones comunicativas en la educación secundaria. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 47(1), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07052021000100323
  • Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing Science Education: Constructing the Scientific Research Programme into the Contingent Nature of Learning Science (K. S. Taber, Ed.). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2431-2
  • Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. Nova, Ed.
  • Verdugo-Castro, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Holgado, A. (2022). Opiniones y percepciones sobre los estudios superiores STEM: un estudio de caso exploratorio en España. Education in the
  • Knowledge Society (EKS), 23. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.27529
  • Verenikina, I. (2010). Vygotsky in Twenty-First-Century Research EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010, Toronto, Canada. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/34614
  • Villanueva Baselga, S., Marimon Garrido, O., & González Burón, H. (2020, 2020/05/27). Drama-Based Activities for STEM Education: Encouraging Scientific Aspirations and Debunking Stereotypes in Secondary School Students in Spain and the UK. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09939-5
  • Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., De-Casas-Moreno, P., & Contreras-Pulido, P. (2020). Divulgación científica en YouTube y su credibilidad para docentes universitarios. Educación XX1, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.25750
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  • Warwick, P., Cook, V., Vrikki, M., Major, L., & Rasmussen, I. (2020). Realising ‘dialogic intentions’ when working with a microblogging tool in secondary school classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100376
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet