El idealismo discursivo en la teoría de la justiciauna crítica a Rainer Forst

  1. Francisco Blanco Brotons
Revue:
Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía

ISSN: 0210-4857

Année de publication: 2023

Número: 50

Pages: 247-268

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía

Résumé

Rainer Forst stands out for his radicalism among the group of philosophers who in recent decades have been working on a theory of justice that combines the structural perspective of Rawls with the intersubjectivist perspective of normative legitimacy and autonomy proposed by discursive theory. In order to collaborate in this development, clarifying some characteristics that these theories should have and warning of some dangers or inconsistencies that they should avoid, this article criticises Rainer Forst's theory. This article will be divided into three parts. In the first part, the limitations of Forst's social theory, in particular his concepts of power, person-hood and politics, will be discussed. Secondly, the limitations of his normative proposal will be analysed. The third part will discuss the limitations of his general approach to the theory of justice.

Références bibliographiques

  • ANDERSON, E. S., "Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non-Instrumental Value". En: T. Christiano & J. P. Christman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 213-227.
  • ARENDT, H., ¿Qué es política? Barcelona: Paidós, 1997.
  • ARENDT, H., Conferencias sobre la filosofía política de Kant. Barcelona: Paidós, 2012.
  • BAUMAN, Z., Amor líquido. Acerca de la fragilidad de los vínculos humanos. Ciudad de México: Fondo de cultura económica, 2005.
  • BENHABIB, S., "Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy". En: S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, 67-94.
  • BENHABIB, S., El ser y el otro en la ética contemporánea. Feminismo, comunitarismo y posmodernismo. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2006.
  • BENHABIB, S., "Democratic Exclusions and Democratic Iterations. Dilemmas of 'Just Membership' and Prospects of Cosmopolitans Federalism". European Journal of Political Theory, 6(4), 2007, 445-462.
  • BLAKE, M., "Distributive Justcie, State Coercion, and Autonomy". Philosophy & Public Affairs, 30(3), 2001, 257-296.
  • BLANCO BROTONS, F., "La prioridad de la injusticia. El giro copernicano en teoría de la justicia". Filosofía Unisinos, 21(3), 2020.
  • BOHMAN, J., "Democratising the global order: from communicative freedom to communicative power". Review of International Studies, 36(2), 2010, 431-447.
  • BOURDIEU, P., Poder, derecho y clases sociales. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer, 2001.
  • CASTORIADIS, C., "Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime". Constelations, 4(1), 1997, 1-18.
  • FORST, R., Contexts of Justice. Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism. Berkeley y Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2002.
  • FORST, R., Justificación y crítica. Madrid: Katz, 2014a.
  • FORST, R., The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 2014b.
  • FRASER, N., Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Conteporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.
  • FRASER, N., "Identity, exclusion and critique. A response to four critics". European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3), 2007, 305-338.
  • GOSEPATH, S., "Democracy out of reason? Comment on Rainer Forst's "The Rule of Reasons"". Ratio Juris, 14(4), 2001, 379-389.
  • HABERMAS, J., "Reconciliación mediante el uso público de la razón". En: J. Habermas & J. Rawls (eds.), Debate sobre el liberalismo político. Barcelona: Paidós, 1998, 41-71.
  • HABERMAS, J., La inclusión del otro. Barcelona: Paidós, 1999.
  • HABERMAS, J., Facticidad y validez. Madrid: Trotta, 2010.
  • HARVEY, D., El cosmopolitismo y las geografías de la libertad. Madrid: Akal, 2017.
  • HORKHEIMER, M., "Teoría tradicional y teoría crítica". En: Teoría Crítica. Buenos Aires y Madrid: Amorrortu, 2003, 223-271.
  • LAFONT, C., "Is the Ideal of a Deliberative Democracy Coherent?". En: S. Besson & J. L. Marti (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006, 3-26.
  • LUKES, S., El poder. Un enfoque radical. Madrid: Siglo veintiuno, 1985.
  • NAGEL, T., "El problema de la justicia global". Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo, 9(1), 2008, 169-196.
  • NUSSBAUM, M. C., Las fronteras de la justicia. Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Barcelona: Paidós, 2013.
  • RAWLS, J., "Réplica a Habermas". En: J. Habermas & J. Rawls (eds.), Debate sobre el liberalismo político. Barcelona: Paidós, 1998, 75-143.
  • RAWLS, J., El liberalismo político. Barcelona: Crítica, 2013.
  • RAWLS, J., Teoría de la Justicia. Ciudad de México: Fondo de cultura económica, 2014.
  • SEWELL, W. H., "A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation". American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1992, 1-29.
  • SHAPIRO, I., Democratic Justice. New Haven: Yale university press, 1999.
  • TULLY, J., "Political Philosophy as a Critical Activity". Political Theory, 30(4), 2002, 533-555.
  • YOUNG, I. M., La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Madrid: Cátedra, 2000.
  • YOUNG, I. M., "Structural Injustice and the Politics of Difference". En: T. Christiano & J. P. Christman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
La source de données: Dialnet