Factores de diseño web orientado a la satisfacción y no-frustración de uso

Bibliographic References

• Ågerfalk, P. J.; Eriksson, O. Usability in Social Action: Reinterpreting Effectiveness, Efficiency and Satisfaction. ECIS 2003 The 11th European Conference on Information Systems. Naples, Italy, June 19-21, 2003.
• Alexander, D. What is the relationship between usability and accessibility, and what should it be? OZeWAI conference on December 3, 2004.
• Baeza Yates, R.; Rivera Loaiza, C. (2003). Ubicuidad y usabilidad en la Web. Revista de Gerencia Tecnológica Informática, julio, vol. 1, n.o 2. Disponible en: http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/~rbaeza/inf/usabilidad.html
• Bengts, M. Usability as a constituent of end-user satisfaction. Master’s thesis in Information Systems. University of Jyväskylä, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, 7 June 2004. Disponible en: http://selene.lib.jyu.fi:8080/gradu/v04/G0000708.pdf
• Bevan, N.; Kirakowski, J.; Maissel, J. What is Usability? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on HCI, Stuttgart, September 1991.
• Brave, S.; Nass, C. Emotion in human-computer interaction. En JACKO, J. y SEARS, A. (eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications (chap. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
• Calisir, F.; Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior, n.o 20, 505-515.
• Carreras, J. Tipología de la Experiencia de Usuario en sites de e-commerce. DNX Ideas- Artículos, 25 de febrero de 2005. Disponible en: http://www.dnxgroup.com/ideas/articulos/tipologia_experiencia_ecommerce.html
• Ceaparu, et al. (2004). Determining Causes and Severity of End-User Frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17 (3), 333-356. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc1703_3
• Davis, S.; Wiedenbeck, S. (2001). The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, ease of use and usefulness perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers, n.o 13, 549-580.
• Dillon, A.; Morris, M. Power, Perception and Performance: From Usability Engineering to Technology Acceptance with the P3 Model of User Response. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, Houston, 1999.
• Dillon, A. (2001). Beyond Usability: Process, Outcome and Affect in human computer interactions. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 26 (4), 57-69.
• Dormann, C. (2000). Designing Electronic Shops, Persuading Consumers to Buy. Euromicro Proceedings, 2 (2), 2140.
• Federici, S. et al. (2005). Checking an integrated model of web accessibility and usability evaluation for disabled people. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27 (13), 781-790. doi:10.1080/09638280400014766
• Folmer, E.; Bosch, J. (2004). Architecting for usability: a survey. Journal of Systems and Software, 70 (1-2), 61-78. doi:10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00159-0
• Frøkjær, E. et al. Measuring Usability: Are Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Satisfaction Really Correlated? CHI 2000, 1-6 abril, 2000, pp. 345-352.
• Fu, L.; Salvendy, G. (2002). The contribution of apparent and inherent usability to a user’s satisfaction in a searching and browsing task on the Web. Ergonomics, 45 (6), 415-424. doi:10.1080/00140130110120033 PMid:12061966
• García Gómez, J. C. (2004). Usabilidad de los sitios accesibles. Úsalo, 16 de agosto.
• Gullikson, S. et al. (1999). The impact of information architecture on academic web site usability. The Electronic Library, 17 (5). doi:10.1108/02640479910330714
• Hartson, H. R. (1998). Human-computer interaction: Interdisciplinary roots and trends. Journal of Systems and Software, 43 (2), 103-118. doi:10.1016/S0164-1212(98)10026-2
• Hassan, Y.; Martín Fernández, F. J. (2004). Propuesta de adaptación de la metodología de Diseño Centrado en el Usuario para el desarrollo de sitios web accesibles. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 27 (3).
• Heijden, H. Van Der (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40, 541-549. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00079-4
• Henry, S. L. Another-ability: Accessibility Primer for Usability Specialists. UPA 2002, the Usability Professionals’ Assocation Annual Conference. Disponible en: http://www.uiaccess.com/upa2002a.html
• Hornbæk, K. (2005). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction.
• ISO 9241-11 (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)s. Part 11 Guidance on usability.
• ITTATC. Accessibility in the User-Centered Design Process. Information Technology Technical Assistance and Training Center, 2004. Disponible en: http://www.ittatc.org/technical/access-ucd/contents.php
• Karvonen, K. The beauty of simplicity. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU 2000), november 16-17, 2000, Washington DC, USA.
• Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Choi, D. (2003). Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 899-940. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.06.002
• Kim, S.; Stoel, L. (2004). Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality. Information & Management, 41, pp. 619-633. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.07.002
• Kurosu, M.; Kashimura, K. (1995a). Determinants of the Apparent Usability. Proceedings of IEEE SMC, 1509-1513.
• Kashimura, K.; Kurosu, M. (1995b). Apparent Usability vs. Inherent Usability Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. CHI’95 Proceedings - Short papers. Disponible en: http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi95/Electronic/documnts/shortppr/mk_bdy.htm
• Larson, K.; Czerwinski, M. Web page design: Implications of memory, structure, and scent for information retrieval. Proceedings of CHI’98 Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 1998, 25-32. Disponible en: http://www.microsoft.com/usability/UEPostings/p25-larson.pdf
• Lautenbach, M. et al. (1999). Evaluating the usability of web pages: a case study. Artificial Intelligence Preprint, 11, Utrecht University. Disponible en: http://www.phil.uu.nl/preprints/ckipreprints/PREPRINTS/preprint011.pdf
• Laviea, T.; Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60 (3), 269-298. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
• Lin, J. C. C.; Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197-208. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00005-0
• Lindgaard, G.; Dudek, C. (2003). What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers, 15, 429-452. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(02)00063-2
• Lindgaard, G. et al. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25 (2), 115-126. doi:10.1080/01449290500330448
• Mahlke, S. Factors influencing the experience of website usage. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2002, pp. 846-847.
• Mahmood, M. A. et al. (2000). Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 52 (4), 751-771. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0353
• Marchionini, G. Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370- 396. Disponible en: http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm doi:10.1037/h0054346
• Morville, P. User Experience Design. Semantic Studios, 21 de junio de 2004. Disponible en: http://semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php
• Muyllea, S.; Moenaertb, R.; Despontin, M. (2004). The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information & Management, 41, 543-560. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00089-2
• Nielsen, J. (1994). Ten Usability Heuristics. UseIt.com. Disponible en:http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html
• Nielsen, J. (1998). Fighting Linkrot. UseIt Alertbox, 14 de Junio de 1998. Disponible en: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980614.html
• Norman, D. (2002). Emotion & Design: attractive things work better. Interactions, 9, 36-42. doi:10.1145/543434.543435
• Petrie, H.; Hamilton, F.; King, N. Tension, what tension?: Website accessibility and visual design. ACM Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility. New York City, New York, 2004, pp. 13-18.
• Rosenfeld, L.; Morville, P. Information Architecture for the World Wide Web, 2.ª ed., 2002. ISBN 0-596-00035-0.
• Sauro, J.; Kindlund, E. A Method to Standardize Usability Metrics Into a Single Score. CHI 2005, April 2-7, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005, pp. 401-409.
• Schenkman, B. N.; Jönsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19 (5), 367-377. doi:10.1080/014492900750000063
• Sutcliffe, A. Assessing the Reliability of Heuristic Evaluation for Website Attractiveness and Usability. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.
• Tractinsky, N. Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. CHI’97, 22-27 March, 1997, pp. 115-122.
• Tractinsky, N.; Katz, A. S.; Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127-145. doi:10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
• Tractinsky, N. Toward the study of aesthetics in information technology. 25th Annual International Conference on Information Systems, Washington, DC, December 12-15, 2004, pp. 771-780.
• Wang, Y. D.; Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 105-125. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008
• Yang, Z. et al. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals. Information & Management, 42, 575-589. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(04)00073-4
• Zhang, P.; Dran, G. M. (2000). Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers: A Two-Factor Model for Website Design and Evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Society, 51 (14), 1253-1268. doi:10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1039>3.0.CO;2-O
• Zhang, P. et al. Websites that Satisfy Users: A Theoretical Framework for Web User Interface Design and Evaluation. IEEE, Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999.
• Zhang, P. et al. A Two Factor Theory for Website Design. IEEE, Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
• Zhang, P. et al. (2001). Important Design Features in Different Web Site Domains: An Empirical Study of User Perceptions. e-Service Journal, 1.1, 77-91. doi:10.2979/ESJ.2001.1.1.77
• Zhang, P.; Li, N. (2005). The Importance of Affective Quality. Communications of the ACM, 48 (9), 105-108. doi:10.1145/1081992.1081997