The Impact of Different Forms of Coaching on the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symtomatology (SIMS)

  1. Esteban Puente-López 1
  2. David Pina 2
  3. Robert Shura 3
  4. Irena Boskovic
  5. Begoña Martínez-Jarreta 4
  6. Thomas Merten
  1. 1 Universidad Nebrija
    info

    Universidad Nebrija

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03tzyrt94

  2. 2 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  3. 3 3 Salisbury VA Medical Center
  4. 4 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

Show affiliations +
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 34

Issue: 4

Pages: 528-536

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2022.129 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Psychometric symptom validity instruments (SVTs) can be vulnerable to coaching, which can negatively affect their performance. Our aim was to assess the impact that different types of coaching may have on the sensitivity of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Methods: A simulation design was used with 232 non-clinical adults divided into five experimental simulation conditions and 58 patients with anxious-depressive symptomatology derived from a traffic accident. All simulators received a basic scenario and, in addition, the second group was instructed on the symptomatology, the third was warned about the risk of exaggerating the presentation, the fourth received a combination of the two previous groups and the fifth received specific training on SVTs. Results: The discriminative ability of the SIMS was higher in the basic and symptom information groups, and it decreased significantly in the specific training group on SVTs. Conclusions: SIMS seems not to be severely impacted by a variety of symptom coaching styles, although test coaching diminished its performance.

Bibliographic References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Author.
  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. Author
  • Aparcero, M., Picard, E. H., Nijdam-Jones, A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2021). The impact of coaching on feigned psychiatric and medical symptoms: A meta-analysis using the MMPI-2. Psychological Assessment, 33(8), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001016
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2015). Daño psicológico en casos de víctimas de violencia de género: estudio comparativo de las evaluaciones forenses [Psychological damage in cases of victims of gender violence: a comparative study of forensic evaluations]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 6(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rips.2015.04.002
  • Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Epstein, N., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Corporation.
  • Boone, K. B., Sweet, J. J., Byrd, D. A., Denney, R. L., Hanks, R. A., Kaufmann, P. M., Kirkwood, M. W., Larrabee, G. J., Marcopulos, B. A., Morgan, J. E., Paltzer, J. Y., Rivera Mindt, M., Schroeder, R. W., Sim, A. H., & Suhr, J. A. (2022). Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology on test security. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(3), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.2022214
  • Boskovic, I., Akca, A., & Giromini, L. (2022). Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2057856
  • Chafetz M. D. (2022). Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide “evidence” for “good effort”. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(6), 1244–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1840633
  • Crisan, I., Sava, F. A., & Maricutoiu, L. P. (2021). Effectiveness of immediate vs. delayed recall in detecting invalid performance in coached and uncoached simulators: Results of two experimental studies. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 23(2), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.24913/rjap.23.2.02
  • Czornik, M., Merten, T., & Lehrner, J. (2021). Symptom and performance validation in patients with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 28(3), 269– 281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1628761
  • Edmundson, M., Berry, D. T. R., Combs, H. L., Brothers, S. L., Harp, J. P. , Williams, A., Rojas, S. L., Saleh, A. K., & Scott, A. B. (2017). The effects of symptom information coaching on the feigning of adult ADHD. Psychological Assessment, 29(12), 1429–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000478
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
  • Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias using self-report measures: New articles, new issues. Psychological Injury and Law 15, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2
  • González-Ordi, H., & Santamaría Fernández, P. (2009). Adaptación española del Inventario Estructurado de Simulación de Síntomas – SIMS [Spanish adaptation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology – SIMS]. TEA Ediciones, S.A.U.
  • González-Ordi, H., Santamaría Fernández, P., & Capilla Ramírez, P. (Eds.) (2012). Estrategias de detección de la simulación. Un manual clínico multidisciplinar [Malingering detection strategies. A multidisciplinary clinical manual]. TEA Ediciones, S.A.U.
  • Gorny, I., & Merten, T. (2006). Symptom information – warning – coaching. How do they affect successful feigning in neuropsychological assessment? Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(4), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v04n04_05
  • Grant, A. F., Lace, J. W., Teague, C. L., Lowell, K. T., Ruppert, P. D., Garner, A. A., & Gfeller, J. D. (2022). Detecting feigned symptoms of depression, anxiety, and ADHD, in college students with the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(4), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1769097
  • Jelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20805
  • Jelicic, M., Hessels, A., & Merckelbach, H. (2006). Detection of feigned psychosis with the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A study of coached and uncoached feigners. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavior Assessment, 28(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-4535-0
  • Jelicic, M., Peters, M. J. V., Leckie, V., & Merckelbach, H. (2007). Basic knowledge of psychopathology does not undermine the efficacy of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Psychopathology (SIMS) to detect feigned psychosis. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03061071
  • Lippa S. M. (2018). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: A clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(3), 391–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146
  • Malik, M. L., Connor, K. M., Sutherland, S. M., Smith, R. D., Davison, R. M., & Davidson, J. R. (1999). Quality of life and posttraumatic stress disorder: A pilot study assessing changes in SF-36 scores before and after treatment in a placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12(2), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024745030140
  • Merckelbach, H., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., van Helvoort, D., Jelicic, M., & Otgaar, H. (2019). When patients overreport symptoms: More than just malingering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419837681
  • Merckelbach, H., & Smith, G. P. (2003). Diagnostic accuracy of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) in detecting instructed malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00191-3
  • Merten, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2020). Factious disorders and malingering. In J. R. Geddes, N. C. Andreasen, & G. M. Goodwin (eds.), New Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry (3rd ed., pp. 1342–1349). Oxford University Press.
  • Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Boskovic, I., Puente-López, E., & Merckelbach, H. (2022a). The Self-Report Symptom Inventory. Psychological Injury and Law, 15, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09434-w
  • Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Bodner, T., Giromini, L., Lehrner, J., González-Ordi, H., Santamaría, P., Schmand, B., & Di Stefano, G. (2022b). Symptom and performance validity assessment in european countries: An update. Psychological Injury and Law, 15, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09436-8
  • Merten, T., & Rogers, R. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2274
  • Pagotto, L. F., Mendlowicz, M. V., Coutinho, E. S., Figueira, I., Luz, M. P., Araujo, A. X., & Berger, W. (2015). The impact of posttraumatic symptoms and comorbid mental disorders on the health-related quality of life in treatment-seeking PTSD patients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 58, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.01.002
  • Parks, A. C., Gfeller, J., Emmert, N., & Lammert, H. (2017). Detecting feigned postconcussional and posttraumatic stress symptoms with the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 24(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1189426
  • Pignolo, C., Giromini, L., Ales, F., & Zennaro, A. (2021). Detection of feigning of different symptom presentations with the PAI and IOP-29. Assessment, 1-15. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211061282
  • Puente-López, E., Pina, D., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., & Llor-Esteban, B. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) in motor vehicle accident patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(1), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1833073
  • Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (Eds.). (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002007
  • Sanz, J., Perdigón, A. L., & Vázquez, C. (2003). Adaptación española del Inventario para la Depresión de Beck-II (BDI-II): 2. Propiedades psicométricas en población general [Spanish adaptation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II): 2. Psychometric properties in general population]. Clínica y Salud, 14(3), 249-280.
  • Sherman, E. M. S., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa019
  • Shiner, B., Watts, B. V., Pomerantz, A., Young-Xu, Y., & Schnurr, P. P. (2011). Sensitivity of the SF-36 to PTSD symptom change in veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20613
  • Shura, R. D., Denning, J. H., Armistead-Jehle, P., & Axelrod, B. N. (2022). Validity testing within the VA and active duty settings. In R. W. Schroeder & P. K. Martin. (eds.), Validity assessment in clinical neuropsychological practice: Evaluating and managing noncredible performance. Guilford Press.
  • Shura, R.D., Ord, A.S., & Worthen, M.D. (2021). Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: a Psychometric Review. Psychological Injury and Law, 15, 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09432-y
  • Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2000). The effects of coaching on the sensitivity and specificity of malingering measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(5), 415–424.
  • Sullivan, K., & Richer, C. (2002). Malingering on subjective complaint tasks: an exploration of the deterrent effects of warning. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(7), 691–708.
  • Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Conference Participants (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
  • Tøien, K., Bredal, I. S., Skogstad, L., Myhren, H., & Ekeberg, O. (2011). Health related quality of life in trauma patients. Data from a one-year follow up study compared with the general population. Scandinavian Journal Of Trauma, Resuscitation And Emergency Medicine, 19, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-19-22
  • Uiterwijk, D., Wong, D., Stargatt, R., & Crowe, S. F. (2021). Performance and symptom validity testing in neuropsychological assessments in Australia: A survey of practices and beliefs. Australian Psychologist, 56(5), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1948797
  • Van Egmond, J., Kummeling, I., & Balkom, T. A. (2005). Secondary gain as hidden motive for getting psychiatric treatment. European Psychiatry, 20(5-6), 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.11.012
  • Van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1336–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.984763
  • Ware J. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine, 25(24), 3130–39. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008
  • Weinborn, M., Woods, S. P., Nulsen, C., & Leighton, A. (2012). The effects of coaching on the verbal and nonverbal medical symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(5), 832–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.686630
  • Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS: Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Youngjohn, J. R., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Binder, L. M. (1999). Comment: Warning malingerers produces more sophisticated malingering. Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14(6), 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1833073
Data source: Dialnet