Polarización sentimental en Twitter durante el Paro Nacional de 2021 en Colombia

  1. Elias Said-Hung
  2. Sergio Arce-García
  3. Daria Mottareale-Calvanese
Revue:
Cuadernos.Info

ISSN: 0719-3661

Année de publication: 2023

Número: 55

Pages: 281-309

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7764/CDI.55.50483 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Cuadernos.Info

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

In 2021, Colombia experienced one of the most significant periods of social protests –initially motivated as a response to the reforms proposed by this country’s government in tax, health, or pension matters– in its recent republican history. A highly conflictive scenario, in which social networks played a leading role reporting what happened each day of protests and as a scenario to vindicate social demands. In this context, this work aims to understand how the sentimental polarization observed on Twitter favored the digital mobilization strategy. To this end, we collected 1,215,646 messages published in Spanish on Twitter from 05/01/2021 to 07/03/2022, and linked to the leading hashtags used during the period studied (#paronacionalcolombia, #nosestanmatandocolombia, #SOSColombia, #Colombiaalertaroja, and #ColombiaSOSDDHH). The results show us an apparent coordination between users located in different countries, who digitally mobilize the debate around these protests through the viralization of thematic axes focused mainly on making visible the protests’ development, the violence of the Colombian security forces, and the violation of human rights. These issues addressed in micro-narratives published on Twitter contain a different sentimental charge, depending on the country of origin of these messages. This can favour the polarization and conflict of public opinion around what happened in that country.

Références bibliographiques

  • Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Castelló-Cogollos, L., & Valderrama-Zurián, J. (2020). Información y comunicación durante los primeros meses de Covid-19. Infodemia, desinformación y papel de los profesionales de la información (Information and communication during the early months of Covid-19: infodemics, misinformation, and the role of information professionals). Profesional De La Información, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.08
  • Aruguete, N. & Calvo, E. (2018). Time to #Protest: Selective Exposure, Cascading Activation, and Framing in Social Media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 480-502. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007
  • Barreto-Galeano, M. I., Medina-Arboleda, I. F., Zambrano-Hernández, S., SabucedoCameselle, J. M., Blanco-Abarca, A., & Maurice Lair, É. (2021). Rhetoric, Political Ideology and the Peace Process in Colombia: A Twitter® Analysis. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(11), 920-937. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2019.1615256
  • Bassignana, E., Basile, V., & Patti, V. (2018). Hurtlex: A Multilingual Lexicon of Words to Hurt. In E. Cabrio, A. Mazzei, & F. Tamburini. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it. Accademia University Press. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.3085
  • Blanco Alfonso, I., García Galera, C., & Tejedor Calvo, S. (2019). El impacto de las fake news en la investigación en Ciencias Sociales. Revisión bibliográfica sistematizada (The impact of fake news on Social Science Research. Systematized bibliographic review). Historia y Comunicación Social, 24(2), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.5209/hics.66290
  • Bradshaw, S., Bailey, H., Howard, P. (2021). Industrialized Disinformation. 2020 Global Inventory of Organized Media Manipulation. Computational Propaganda Research Project. Oxford Internet Institute. https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/industrialized-disinformation/
  • Bradshaw, S. & Howard, P.N. (2017). Troops, Trolls and Troublemakers: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation. In Computational Propaganda Research Project (pp. 1–37). Oxford Internet Institute. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cef7e8d9-27bf-4ea5-9fd6-855209b3e1f6
  • Breiman L. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315139470
  • Bodrunova, S., Blekanov, I., Smoliarova, A., & Litvinenko, A. (2019). Beyond Left and Right: Real-World Political Polarization in Twitter Discussions on Inter-Ethnic Conflicts. Media and Communication, 7(3), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.1934
  • Campos-Domínguez, E., Penteado, C., & Cervi, E. (2021). Polarización en Twitter. El caso de Brasil a través de cinco conflictos políticos (Ideological polarisation on Twitter. The case of Brazil throught five political conflicts). Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, 26, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.6035/clr.5837
  • Carney, N. (2016). All Lives Matter, but so Does Race: Black Lives Matter and the Evolving Role of Social Media. Humanity & Society, 40(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597616643868
  • Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future. Profesional De La Información, 27(5), 964–974. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.sep.01
  • Colombia - Emigrantes totales (Colombia. Total emigrants). (n.d). Datosmacro.com. https://bit.ly/3Pd4BwM
  • Conger, K. & Raj, S. (2022, March 30). Pro-Russia Sentiment on India Twitter Draws Scrutiny. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/world/russia-ukrainewar-twitter-india-7843587/
  • Díaz Guevara, H. H. (2021). Comentarios para una historia crítica del presente: el Paro Nacional de abril de 2021 en Colombia como acontecimiento (Comments for a critical history of the present: the National Strike of April 2021 in Colombia as an event). Revista Cambios y Permanencias, 12(1), 619-645. https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistacyp/article/view/12400
  • DiResta, R. Shaffer, K., Ruppel, B., Sullivan, R., Matney, R., Fox, R., Albright, J. & Johnson, B. (2019). The Tactics & Tropes of the Internet Research Agency. Congress of the United States. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/senatedocs/2/
  • Estrada-Cuzcano, A., Alfaro-Mendives, K., & Saavedra-Vásquez, V. (2020). Disinformation y Misinformation, Posverdad y Fake News: precisiones conceptuales, diferencias, similitudes y yuxtaposiciones (Disinformation and Misinformation, Post-truth and fake news: conceptual precisions, differences, similarities and juxtapositions.). Información, Cultura y Sociedad, (42), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i42.7427
  • Fundación Karisma (2021, May 5). Fallas de internet, bloqueos de redes y censura de contenidos en protestas: Realidades y retos para el ejercicio de los derechos humanos en los contextos digitales (Internet failures, network blockades and content censorship in protests: Realities and challenges for the exercise of human rights in digital contexts). https://web.karisma.org.co/ paronacionalcolombia-fallas-de-internet-bloqueos-de-redes-censura-de contenidosrealidades-y-retos-para-el-ejercicio-de-los-derechos-humanos-en-los-contextos-digitales/
  • Fernández, A M. (2018). Comunicar emociones en el discurso metapolítico de twitter: el caso de #MADURO versus @NICOLASMADURO (Communicating emotions in the metapolitical discourse of twitter: the case of #MADURO versus @NICOLASMADURO). Observatorio (OBS*), 12(3), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS12320181214
  • Gallego Galvis, S. X., Gayón Tavera, D. R., & Alzate Pongutá, J. F. (2021). Political Language on Twitter during the Runoff Voting in the 2018 Presidential Election). Anagramas: Rumbos y sentidos de la comunicación, 20(39), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v20n39a5
  • Gertrudis, R. M. & Grill, R. (2021). Lejos, pero no ausentes. Movilizaciones Diaspóricas en el Paro Nacional del 2021 (Far away, but not absent. Diasporic Mobilizations in the National Strike of 2021). In Pensar la resistencia: Mayo del 2021 en Cali y Colombia Documentos Especiales CIDSE No. 6 (Thinking Resistance: May 2021 in Cali and Colombia CIDSE Special Papers No. 6) (pp. 184-201). Universidad del Valle.
  • Holbrook, E., Kaur, G., Bond, J., Imbriani, J., Nsoesie, E., & Grant, C. (2016). Tweet Geolocation Error Estimation. International Conference on GIScience Short Paper Proceedings, 1(1), 130-133. https://doi.org/10.21433/b3110wf6w9p9
  • Jost, J. T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2018). How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks. Advances in Political Psychology, 39(1), 85-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12478
  • Kearney, M.W. (2019). rtweet: Collecting and analyzing Twitter data. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(42), 1829. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01829
  • Kemp, S. (2021, February 11). Digital 2021: Colombia. Datareportal. https://datareportal.com/ reports/digital-2021 colombia
  • Kovic, M., Rauchfleisch, A., Sele, M., & Caspar, C. (2018). Digital astroturfing in politics: Definition, typology, and countermeasures. Studies in Communication Sciences, 18(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2018.01.005
  • Kucharski, A. (2016). Study epidemiology of fake news. Nature, 540, 525. https://doi.org/10.1038/540525a
  • Lantz, B. (2019). Machine Learning with R. Packt Publishing.
  • Leiser, M. (2016). AstroTurfing, ‘CyberTurfing’ and other online persuasion campaigns. European Journal of Law and Technology, 7(1), 1–27. https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/501
  • Lingiardi, V., Carone, N., Semeraro, G., Musto, C., DÁmico, M., & Brena, S. (2019). Mapping Twitter hate speech towards social and sexual minorities: a lexicon-based approach to semantic content análisis. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(7), 711-721. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1607903
  • Lowy, M. (2003). Walter Benjamin: aviso de incendio. Una lectura de las tesis “Sobre el concepto de historia" (Walter Benjamin: fire warning. A reading of the theses "On the concept of history"). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Luengo, O. & Fernández-García, B. (2019). Campaign Coverage in Spain: Populism, Emerging Parties, and Personalization. In S. Salgado (Ed.), Mediated Campaigns and Populism in Europe. Political Campaigning and Communication (pp. 99-121). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98563-3_5
  • Meza, A. (2021, May 8). Internet en Colombia: el otro gran escenario de las protestas (Internet in Colombia: the other great stage of the protests). France24. https://www. france24.com/es/programas/revista-digital/20210508-internet colombia-otroescenario-protestas
  • Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling Social Movements Through Social Media: The Case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media + Society, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118807911
  • Mohammad, S.M. (2016). Sentiment Analysis: Detecting Valence, Emotions, and Other Affectual States from Text. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Emotion Measurement (pp. 201-237). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6
  • Mohammad, S. M. & Turney, P.D. (2012). Crowdsourcind a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x
  • Neudert, L. M., Howard, P., & Kollanyi, B. (2019). Sourcing and Automation of Political News and Information During Three European Elections. Social Media + Society, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863147
  • Ong, J.C., Tapsell, R., & Curato, N. (2019). Tracking Digital Disinformation in the 2019 Philippine Midterm Election. New Mandala. https://bit.ly/3L1gxOH
  • Pano Alamán, A. (2020). La política del hashtag en Twitter (Hashtag Politics in Twitter). Vivat Academia, (152), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2020.152.49-68
  • Pérez-Curiel, C. & Limón, P. (2019). Political influencers. A study of Donald Trump’s personal brand on Twitter and its impact on the media and users. Communication & Society, 32(1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.57-76
  • Pérez-Curiel, C. & Velasco Molpeceres, A. M. (2020). Impacto del discurso político en la difusión de bulos sobre COVID 19. Influencia de la desinformación en públicos y medios (Impact of political discourse on the dissemination of hoaxes about COVID-19. Influence of misinformation in public and media). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (78), 65-97. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1469
  • Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion, a Psychoevolutionady Synthesis. Harper & Row.
  • Ponte, J. (2022). La campaña peruana en Twitter. Análisis de la polarización afectiva durante la segunda vuelta de las elecciones generales 2021 (The Peruvian campaign on Twitter. Analysis of affective polarization during the second round of the 2021 general elections). Cuadernos.Info, (53), 138-161. https://doi. org/10.7764/cdi.53.49539
  • Rincón, M. (2021). Arengas. El discurso homofóbico y transfóbico en medio del Paro Nacional de Colombia 2021 (Harangues. Homophobic and transphobic discourse in the midst of the National Strike of Colombia 2021). Revista Mexicana de Comunicación, (148), http://mexicanadecomunicacion.com.mx/arengas-el-discurso-homofobico ytransfobico-en-medio-del-paro-nacional-de-colombia-2021/
  • Said-Hung, E., Merino-Arribas, A., & Martínez, J. (2021). Evolución del debate académico en la Web of Science y Scopus sobre unfaking news (2014-2019) (Evolution of the academic debate on the Web of Science and Scopus about unfaking news (2014-2019)). Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 27(3), 961-971. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.71031
  • Sánchez-Mendoza, V., Lara-Gutiérrez, J. M., Rodríguez-Obando, A. C., Santamaría-Uribe, L. S., & Carranza-Carranza, J. L. (2017). Análisis del discurso en torno a los diálogos de paz (Analysis of the discourse surrounding the peace dialogues). Editorial Universidad Católica de Colombia.
  • Sautera, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. PNAS, 107(6), 2408–2412. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908239106
  • Swati, U., Pranali, C., & Pragati, S. (2015). Sentiment analysis of news articles using machine learning approach. International Journal of Advances in Electronics and Computer Science, 2(4), 114-116. http://www.iraj.in/journal/journal_file/journal_pdf/12-1271430132488114-116.pdf
  • Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 267-307. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00049
  • Urman, A. (2020). Context matters: political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857-879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541
  • Valencia, G. (2021). ¿Qué está pasando en Colombia? Poder, legitimidad y crisis social (What is happening in Colombia? Power, legitimacy and social crisis). In Pensar la resistencia: Mayo del 2021 en Cali y Colombia Documentos Especiales CIDSE No. 6 (Thinking Resistance: May 2021 in Cali and Colombia CIDSE Special Papers No. 6) (pp. 15-39). Universidad del Valle.
  • Van der Veen, H., Hiemstra, D., van den Broek, T., Ehrenhard, M., & Need, A. (2015). Determine the User Country of a Tweet. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02483. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1508.02483
  • Van Dijck, J. (2019). La cultura de la conectividad: una historia crítica de las redes sociales (The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media). Siglo XXI editores.
  • Villa, M., Herrera, J. J., & Bautista, J. S. (2017). Facebook y la Radio Pública. La Agenda Setting Durante el Paro Nacional Agrario en Colombia (Facebook and public radio. The agenda setting during the agricultural strike in Colombia). Observatorio (OBS*), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS11220171066
  • Waisbord, S. (2020). ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva (Is it Valid to Attribute Political Polarization to Digital Communication? On Bubbles, Platforms and Affective Polarization). Revista SAAP, 14(2), 249-279. https://doi.org/10.46468/rsaap.14.2.A1
  • Wissman, B. (2018, March 2). Micro-Influencers: The Marketing Force of The Future? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/barrettwissman/2018/03/02/micro-influencers-themarketing-force-of-the-future/ sh=3af4afe76707
  • Wylie, C. (2020). Mindf*ck. Cambridge Analytica, la trama para desestabilizar el mundo (Mindf*ck. Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America). Roca Editorial de Libros.
  • Zhao, Z., Shao, J., Sano, Y., Takayasy, H., Takayasu, M., Li, D., Wu, J., & Havlin, S. (2020). Fake news propagates differently from real news even at early stages of spreading. EPJ Data Science, 9, 7. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00224-z
La source de données: Dialnet