Diferencias Entre Hombres y Mujeres en la Aceptación de los Roles y Estereotipos de Género en la Violencia de Pareja

  1. Agustina M. Vinagre-González
  2. Esteban Puente-López
  3. Marta M. Aguilar-Cárceles
  4. Marta E. Aparicio-García
  5. Ismael Loinaz
Revista:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

ISSN: 2171-2069

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 14

Número: 2

Páginas: 75-82

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.23923/J.RIPS.2023.02.068 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Antecedentes/Objetivos: La violencia de pareja contra las mujeres es una forma generalizada de violencia de género presente en sociedades de todo tipo. Entre los posibles factores implicados en su existencia se encuentran los estereotipos de género y las distorsiones cognitivas de carácter sexista o justificadoras de la violencia. Por ello, se diseñó una encuesta a población general con el objetivo de estudiar las diferencias de género en la aceptación de roles y estereotipos de género, y la violencia contra las mujeres en las relaciones íntimas. Método: Un total de 391 participantes de la población general (61.9% mujeres) con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y los 67 años, respondieron a medidas de interiorización de normas o mandatos de género basadas en la socialización diferencial, pensamientos distorsionados sobre la mujer y el uso de la violencia, creencias sobre la violencia en la pareja y deseabilidad social. Resultados: Los hombres puntuaron más alto en diferentes tipos de sexismo y estereotipos, en estereotipos relacionados con la maternidad y el amor romántico generalmente atribuido a las mujeres. Por el contrario, no se observaron diferencias de género en la justificación de la violencia. Tampoco se encontraron diferencias significativas en el factor nivel educativo. Conclusiones: Se discuten las implicaciones de los resultados para los contenidos de los programas de prevención e intervención.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles for psychologists and code of conduct. Author. https://www.apa.org/ethics/ code
  • Arce, R., Fariña, F., Seijo, D., & Novo, M. (2015). Assessing impression management with the MMPI-2 in child custody litigation. Assessment, 22(6), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114558111
  • Arias, E., Arce, R., Vázquez, M. J., & Marcos, V. (2020). Treatment efficacy on the cognitive competence of convicted intimate partner violence offenders. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 36(3), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.428771
  • Begall, K., Grunow, D., & Buchler, S. (2023). Multidimensional gender ideologies across Europe: Evidence from 36 countries. Gender & Society, 37(2), 177-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231155914
  • Bonilla-Algovia, E., & Rivas-Rivero, E. (2021). Intimate partner violence against women: A study on the beliefs of trainee teachers in Spain and Latin America. International Journal of Psychological Research, 14(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5103
  • Bonilla-Algovia, E., & Rivas-Rivero, E. (2022). Papel del sexismo, los mitos románticos y los eventos vitales adversos en la violencia de género: Un estudio con agresores de pareja [Influence of sexism, romantic myths and adverse life events on gender-based violence: A study with partner aggressors]. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 13(2), 112- 119. https://doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2022.02.057
  • Bucheli, M., & Rossi, M. (2019). Attitudes toward intimate partner violence against women in Latin America and the Caribbean. SAGE Open, 9(3), 2158244019871061. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019871061
  • Cameron, J. J., & Stinson, D. A. (2019). Gender (mis)measurement: Guidelines for respecting gender diversity in psychological research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(11), e12506. https:// doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12506
  • Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.) Academic Press.
  • Dardis, C. M., Edwards, K. M., Kelley, E. L., & Gidycz, C. A. (2016). Perceptions of dating violence and associated correlates: A study of college young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(21), 3245- 3271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515597439
  • Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75, 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
  • Echeburúa, E., Amor, P. J., Sarasua, B., Zubizarreta, I., & Holgado-Tello, F. P. (2016). Inventario de Pensamientos Distorsionados sobre la Mujer y el Uso de la Violencia - Revisado (IPDMUV-R): Propiedades psicométricas [Inventory of Distorted Thoughts about Women and the Use of ViolenceRevised (IPDMUV-R): Psychometric properties]. Anales de Psicología, 32(3), 837-846. https://10.6018/analesps.32.3.231901
  • Expósito-Álvarez, C., Lila, M., Gracia, E., and Martín-Fernández, M. (2021). Risk factors and treatment needs of batterer intervention program participants with substance abuse problems. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13(2), 87 - 97. https://doi. org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a9
  • Fahlberg, A., & Pepper, M. (2016). Masculinity and sexual violence: Assessing the state of the field. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12397
  • Ferragut, M., Blanca, M. J., & Ortiz-Tallo, M. (2014). Analysis of adolescent profiles by gender: Strengths, attitudes toward violence and sexism. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E59. https://doi.org/10.1017/ sjp.2014.60
  • Ferrer-Pérez, V. A., & Bosch-Fiol, E. (2014). Gender violence as a social problem in Spain: Attitudes and acceptability. Sex Roles, 70(11), 506- 521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0322-z
  • Ferrer-Pérez, V. A., Bosch-Fiol, E., Sánchez-Prada, A., & Delgado-Álvarez, C. (2019). Beliefs and attitudes about intimate partner violence against women in Spain. Psicothema, 31(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2018.206
  • García-Ael, C., Recio, P., & Silván-Ferrero, P. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Beliefs about Intimate Partner Violence (IBIPV). Anales de Psicología, 34(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.6018/ analesps.34.1.232901
  • García-Díaz, V., Lana-Pérez, A., Fernández-Feito, A., Bringas-Molleda, C., Rodríguez-Franco, L., & Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2018). Actitudes sexistas y reconocimiento del maltrato en parejas jóvenes [Sexist attitudes and recognition of abuse in young couples]. Atención Primaria, 50(7), 398- 405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.04.001
  • Grzyb, M. (2023). The Polish variant of patriarchy? Explaining the relationship between gender inequality and violence against women in Poland. Violence against Women. Advance online publication. https:// doi.org/10.1177/10778012231159415
  • Guerrero-Molina, M., Moreno-Manso, J. M., Guerrero-Barona, E., García-Baamonde, M. E., Cruz-Márquez, B., & Bueso-Izquierdo, N. (2021). Aggressors condemned for intimate partner violence: Sexist attitudes and distorted thoughts about women and the use of violence. Current Psychology, 42, 560-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144- 021-01473-5
  • Gutiérrez, S., Sanz, J., Espinosa, R., Gesteira, C., & García-Vera, M. P. (2016). La Escala de Deseabilidad Social de Marlowe-Crowne: Baremos para la población general española y desarrollo de una versión breve [The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale: Norms for the Spanish general population and development of a short version]. Anales de Psicología, 32, 206-217. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/ analesps.32.1.185471
  • Hernández, W. (2021). Violence with femicide risk: Its effects on women and their children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11-12), NP6465-NP6491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518815133
  • Hickle, K. E., & Roe-Sepowitz, D. E. (2014). Putting the pieces back together: A group intervention for sexually exploited adolescent girls. Social Work with Groups, 37(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0160 9513.2013.823838
  • Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Ocampo, N. Y., Herrero, J., and Rodríguez-Díaz, F. J. (2022). Dyadic analysis of emotional intimate partner violence: An estimation of dyadic patterns and influencing individual, family, and couple factors. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 14(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2022a10
  • Kaiser, C. R., Bandt-Law, B., Cheek, N. N., & Schachtman, R. (2022). Gender prototypes shape perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 254- 261. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221078592
  • Lizzio-Wilson, M., Klas, A., & Clarke, E. J. R. (2022). When “good guys” do bad things: Evaluations of sexual harassment allegations against male allies. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221094432
  • Llano-Suárez, A., Lana, A., Gasch-Gallén, Á., & Fernández-Feito, A. (2021). Gender roles and intimate partner violence among female university students in Spain: A cross-sectional study. PloS One, 16(11), e0259839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259839
  • Loinaz, I. (2014). Distorsiones cognitivas en agresores de pareja: Análisis de una herramienta de evaluación [Cognitive distortions among partneryiolent men: analyzing an assessment tool]. Terapia Psicológica, 32(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082014000100001
  • Loinaz, I. (2016). Cuando “el” delincuente es “ella”: intervención con mujeres violentas [When “the” offender is “she”: Intervention with violent women]. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 26, 41-50. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2016.04.006
  • Loinaz, I., Echeburúa, E., Ortiz-Tallo, M., & Amor, P. J. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2) en una muestra española de agresores de pareja [Psychometric properties of the Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2) in a Spanish sample of partner-violent men]. Psicothema, 24(1), 142-148. https://www.psicothema.com/ico/pdf_ico. png
  • Loinaz, I., Barboni, L., & Ma de Sousa, A. (2020). Gender differences in child-to-parent violence risk factors. Anales de Psicología, 36(3), 408- 417. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.428531
  • López-Ossorio, J. J., Carbajosa, P., Cerezo-Domínguez, A. I., GonzálezÁlvarez, J. L., Loinaz, I., & Muñoz, J. M. (2018). Taxonomía de los homicidios de mujeres en las relaciones de pareja [Taxonomy of homicides of women in intimate partner relationships]. Psychosocial Intervention, 27(2), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2018a11
  • Lowe, H., Brown, L., Ahmad, A., Daruwalla, N., Gram, L., Osrin, D., Panchal, K., Watson, D., Zimmerman, C., & Mannell, J. (2022). Mechanisms for community prevention of violence against women in low- and middle-income countries: A realist approach to a comparative analysis of qualitative data. Social Science & Medicine, 305, 115064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115064
  • Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2022). Measuring perceived severity of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) among the general population and IPVAW offenders. Psychosocial Intervention, 31, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2022a8
  • Matias, A., Gonçalves, M., Soeiro, C., & Matos, M. (2020). Intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis of risk factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.101358
  • Midi, H., Sarkar, S. K., & Rana, S. (2010). Collinearity diagnostics of binary logistic regression model. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2010.10700699
  • Morales, J. F., Yubero, S., & Larrañaga, E. (2016). Gender and bullying: Application of a three-factor m odel of gender atereotyping. Sex Roles, 74(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0463-3
  • Moreh, C. (2019). Online survey design and implementation: Targeted data collection on social media platforms. SAGE. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781526479709
  • Moya, M., & Moya-Garófano, A. (2021). Evolution of gender stereotypes in Spain: From 1985 to 2018. Psicothema, 33(1), 53-59. https://doi. org/10.7334/psicothema2020.328
  • Muñoz-Rivas, M., Ronzón-Tirado, R. C., Zamarrón, M. D., & Redondo, N. (2021). Cross-cultural analysis of teen dating victimization: Typologies, correlates, and implications for intervention. Psicothema, 33(1), 103- 110. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.248
  • Nabors, E. L., & Jasinski, J. L. (2009). Intimate partner violence perpetration among college students: The role of gender role and gendered violence attitudes. Feminist Criminology, 4(1), 57–82. https://doi. org/10.1177/1557085108325235
  • Reyes, H. L. M., Foshee, V. A., Niolon, P. H., Reidy, D. E., & Hall, J. E. (2016). Gender role attitudes and male adolescent dating violence perpetration: Normative beliefs as moderators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 350-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0278-0
  • Rosen, N. L., & Nofziger, S. (2019). Boys, bullying, and gender roles: How hegemonic masculinity shapes bullying behavior. Gender Issues, 36(3), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-018-9226-0
  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 166-169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166
  • Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Pina, D1., Puente-López, E., Luna-Maldonado, A., & Llor-Esteban, B. (2020). Attitudes towards School Violence Questionnaire, Revised Version: CAHV-28. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 12(2), 61-68. https://doi. org/10.1016/10.5093/ejpalc2020a8
  • Salami’, T., Gordon, M., Babu, J., Coverdale, J., & Nguyen, P. T. (2021). Treatment considerations for foreign-born victims of human trafficking: Practical applications of an ecological framework. Transcultural Psychiatry, 58(2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461520983950
  • Scarborough, W. J., Sin, R., & Risman, B. (2019). Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender & Society, 33(2), 173-200. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604
  • Spencer, C. M., & Stith, S. M. (2020). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A metaanalysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 527-540. https://doi. org/10.1177/1524838018781101
  • Stanziani, M., Newman, A. K., Cox, J., & Coffey, C. A. (2020). Role call: Sex, gender roles, and intimate partner violence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26(3), 208-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1652746
  • Toplu-Demirtaş, E., Öztemür, G., & Fincham, F. D. (2020). Perceptions of dating violence: Assessment and antecedents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), NP48-NP75. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260520914558
  • Turchik, J. A., Hebenstreit, C. L., & Judson, S. S. (2015). An examination of the gender inclusiveness of current theories of sexual violence in adulthood: Recognizing male victims, female perpetrators, and samesex violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(2), 133-148. https://doi. org/10.1177/1524838014566721
  • Ullman, S. E. (2023). Correlates of social reactions to victims’ disclosures of sexual assault and intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(1), 29-43. https://doi. org/10.1177/15248380211016013
  • Vinagre-González, A., Aparicio-García, M., & Alvarado-Izquierdo, J. (2020). IVISEM, una medida de la violencia social encubierta hacia las mujeres [IVISEM, a measure of covert social violence towards women]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 57(4), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP57.4.11
  • Wagers, S. M., Wareham, J., & Boots, D. P. (2017). College students’ beliefs about domestic violence: A replication and extension. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(3-4), NP1482-1511NP. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260517747606
  • Willie, T. C., & Kershaw, T. S. (2019). An ecological analysis of gender inequality and intimate partner violence in the United States. Preventive Medicine, 118, 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ypmed.2018.10.019
  • Wilson, J. M., & Smirles, K. (2020). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner violence: The effects of type of abuse and perpetrator gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1-2), 172-194. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260520908025
  • Yang, M., Beybutyan, A., Pina Ríos, R., & Soria-Verde, M. A. (2021). Public attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women and influential factors in China and Spain. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 31, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2021a13
  • You, S., & Shin, K. (2022). Influence of patriarchal sex-role attitudes on perpetration of dating violence. Current Psychology, 41(2), 943-948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00632-4
  • Zidenberg, A. M., Wielinga, F., Sparks, B., Margeotes, K., & Harkins, L. (2022). Lost in translation: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of rape myth acceptance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1905810
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet