The study of emoji linguistic behaviouran examination of the theses raised (and not raised) in the academic literature

  1. Enrique Ferrari 1
  1. 1 Univ. Internacional de La Rioja
Revista:
Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

ISSN: 2386-7876

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 36

Número: 2

Páginas: 115-128

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15581/003.36.2.115-128 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Comunicación y sociedad = Communication & Society

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This bibliographic review of academic research on emoji reveals how the bulk of studies accepts it as a language but do not develop detailed linguistic analysis that could support this claim: they accept the clues provided by the initial studies, as if the scientific community had already reached such a consensus. However, the truth is that the fields in which emoji have generated the greatest academic interest (computer science, psychology and cognitive science) have considered the study of their linguistic nature a minor issue. Therefore, research on emoji has been growing over the years, widening the scope of its contributions, but with a common core made up of few basic notions about its linguistic condition that has important blind spots, in which Linguistics hasn’t done (generally) its work to place it in this new context for communication that the digital environments represent, despite the supports provided by multimodality and visual language theory. From these two disciplines, some authors have boldly suggested the emoji’s status as a gesture. However, to analyse its linguistic nature and behaviour, it is more accurate to understand the emoji, not as a gesture, but as a simplified representation of a gesture, without the unique features that a personal gesture has. The emoji seems to be the tool that, with fewer resources, best ensures that the interlocutor can understand the intentionality with which the sender has written the message.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Azani, S. and El-Alfy, E. (2018). Emoji-Based Sentiment Analysis of Arabic Microblogs Using Machine Learning. 21st Saudi Computer Society National Computer Conference, NCC 2018. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/NCG.2018.8592970
  • Arafah, B. and Hasyim, M. (2019). Linguistic functions of emoji in social media communication. Opción, 35 (Special Edition 24), 558-574.
  • Ares G., Vidal, L. and Jaeger, S. R. (2021). How do consumers use emoji in a food-related context? Insights for the design and interpretation of emoji questionnaires. Journal of Sensory Studies, 36(4). https://www.doi.org/10.1111/joss.12663
  • Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z. and Yang, M. (2019). A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, art. 2221. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
  • Barbieri, F., Kruszewski, G. and Ronzano, F. (2016). How Cosmopolitan Are Emojis? Exploring Emojis Usage and Meaning over Different Languages with Distributional Semantics. MM 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Multimedia Conference. https://www.doi.org/10.1145/2964284.2967
  • Cantamutto, L. and Vela Delfa, C. (2019). Interpretación de emojis en interacciones digitales en Español. Lenguas Modernas, 54, 29-47.
  • Casañ Pitarch, R. (2020), Los políticos españoles en Twitter: un análisis lingüístico de su discurso escrito. Ibérica, 40, 195-216.
  • Cohn, N. (2018). Visual Language Theory and the Scientific Study of Comics. In J. Wildfeuer, A. Dunst and J. Laubrock, Empirical Comics Research: Digital, Multimodal and Cognitive Methods (pp. 305-328). London: Routledge.
  • Cohn, N., Engelen, J. and Schilperoord, J. (2019). The grammar of emoji? Constraints on communicative pictorial sequencing. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, 33. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0177-0
  • Cohn, N. and Schilperoord, J. (2022). Remarks on Multimodality: Grammatical Interactions in the Parallel Architecture. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, art. 778060. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.778060
  • Danesi, M. (2016). The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Danesi, M. (2019). Emojis: Langue or Parole. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(2), 243-258. https://www.doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0015
  • Duarte, L., Macedo, L. and Gonçalo Oliveira, H. (2019). Exploring Emojis for Emotion Recognition in Portuguese Text. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11805 LNAI, 719-730. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30244-3_59
  • Evans, V. (2017). The Emoji Code: How Smiley Faces, Love Hearts and Thumbs Up are Changing the Way We Communicate. London: Michael O’Mara Books.
  • Ge, J. and Gretzel, U. (2018). Emoji rhetoric: a social media influencer perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(15-16), 1272-1295. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1483960
  • Gn, J. (2018). Emoji as a ‘language’ of cuteness. First Monday, 23(9). https://www.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i9.9396
  • Grosz, P., Kaiser, E. and Pierini, F. (2021). Discourse anaphoricity and first-person indexicality in emoji resolution. In P. G. Grosz, L. Martí, H. Pearson, Y. Sudo and S. Zobel (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 25, 720-732. London: University College London and Queen Mary University of London. https://www.doi.org/10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.941
  • Jackendoff, R. and Wittenberg, E. (2014). What you can say without syntax: a hierarchy of grammatical complexity. In F. Newmeyer and L. Preston (Eds.), Measuring Grammatical Complexity (pp. 65-82). Oxford Scholarship Online. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.001.0001
  • Kavanagh, B. (2010). A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and English nonverbal online communication: The use of emoticons in weblogs. Intercultural Communication Studies, 3, 65-80.
  • Katz, A. W. K., Mansoor, L. E., Tsidya, M., Mathebula, F., Singh, D., Siva, S., Akello, C., Chitowa, T. H., García, M., Soto-Torres, L. and Montgomery, E. T. (2021). Using Emoji Stickers to Understand End-User Opinions of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention. AIDS and Behavior, 25(12), 3955-3966. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03338-1
  • Khalifa, Y. and Elnagar, A. (2021). Sentiment Analysis of Colloquial Arabic Tweets with Emojis. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1339, 418-430. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69717-4_40
  • Kootbodien, A., Prasad, N. V. and Ali, M. S. B. S. (2018). Trends and impact of WhatsApp as a mode of communication among Abu Dhabi students. Media Watch, 9(2), 257-266. https://www.doi.org/10.15655/mw/2018/v9i2/49380
  • Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, L. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
  • Lemke, J. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56. https://www.doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
  • Li, L. and Yang, Y. (2018). Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication ⎼a corpus-based study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 129-150. https://www.doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2021.08.001
  • Luor, T., Wu, L.-L., Lu, H.-P. and Tao, Y.-H. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simplex and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 889-895. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.003
  • McCulloch, G. and Gawne, L. (2018). Emoji Grammar as Beat Gestures. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2130. https://www.doi.org/10.1023/b:nala.0000015789.98638.f9
  • Menglan, Q., Yuhui, F. and Haiyang, Y. (2017). Sentence structure study of Emoji communication. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Business Corporation and Development in South-East and South Asia Under B&R Initiative (Isbcd 2017), 42, 83-86. https://www.doi.org/10.2991/isbcd-17.2017.17
  • Pierini, F. (2021). Emojis and gestures: a new typology. In P. G. Grosz, L. Martí, H. Pearson, Y. Sudo and S. Zobel, Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 25, 720-732. London: University College London and Queen Mary University of London. https://www.doi.org/10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.963
  • Provine, R., Spencer, R. and Mandell, D. (2007). Emotional Expression Online: Emoticons Punctuate Website Text Messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 299-307. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303481
  • Sampietro, A. (2016). Exploring the Punctuating Effect of Emoji in Spanish Whatsapp Chats. Lenguas Modernas, 47, 91-113.
  • Santhanam, S., Srinivasan, V., Mahajan, K. and Shaikh, S. (2021). Towards Understanding How Emojis Express Solidarity in Crisis Events. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 271, 133-140. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80624-8_17
  • Schouteten, J. J. and Meiselman, H. L. (2021). The potential of using emoji instead of words when measuring emotions associated with food. Food Quality and Preference, 92. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104182
  • Seargeant, P. (2019). The Emoji Revolution: How Technology is Shaping the Future of Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shoeb, A. and de Melo, G. (2021). Assessing Emoji Use in Modern Text Processing Tools. 59th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 11th international joint conference on natural language processing, 1, 1379-1388. https://www.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.110
  • Sick, J., Monteleone, E., Pierguidi, L., Ares, G. and Spinelli, S. (2020). The Meaning of Emoji to Describe Food Experiences in Pre-Adolescents. Foods, 9(9), 1-20. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/foods9091307
  • Sun, Y. (2019). Changes from the Internet Language to Emoji. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Inter-Cultural Communication, 378, 508-511. https://www.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.191217.181
  • Swartz, M. and Crooks, A. (2020). Comparison of Emoji Use in Names, Profiles, and Tweets. Proceedings - 14th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC 2020, 375-380. https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2020.00075
  • Tang, Y. and Hew, K. (2019). Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2457-2483.
  • Vatian, A., Shapovalova, A., Dobrenko, N., Vedernikov, N., Nigmatullin, N., Vasilev, A., Stankevich, A. and Gusarova, N. (2018). The Influence of Emoji on the Internet Text Perception. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 859, 55-66. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02846-6_5
  • Wagner, A., Marusek, S. and Yu, W. (2020). Sarcasm, the smiling poop, and E-discourse aggressiveness: getting far too emotional with emojis. Social Semiotics, 30(3), 305-311. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731151
  • Wahyuni, R. and Budi, I. (2018). Combining Linguistic, Semantic and Lexicon Feature for Emoji Classification in Twitter Dataset. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 194-201. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.166
  • Weissman, B. and Tanner, D. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PLOS ONE, 13(8), 1-26. https://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201727
  • Yus, F. (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3), 511-529. https://www.doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet