La soledad en la alta capacidad intelectualFactores de Riesgo y Estrategias de Afrontamiento

  1. Gómez León, María Isabel 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja. España
Revista:
Revista de psicoterapia

ISSN: 1130-5142,  2339-7950

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Psicoterapias Transpersonales

Volumen: 31

Número: 117

Páginas: 297-311

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.33898/RDP.V31I117.364 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicoterapia

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Los niños y adolescentes con alta capacidad intelectual (ACI) presentan una serie de características y necesidades únicas que en ocasiones son difícilmente comprendidas y toleradas por el resto, por lo que a menudo se enfrentan a situaciones de soledad física o compartida con graves repercusiones en la salud física y mental. Las investigaciones sugieren que si la ACI no se desarrolla en un contexto socioafectivo adecuado desde la infancia estos niños y adolescentes podrían estar en riesgo con respecto a la salud mental para poder convertirse en adultos sanos en un aspecto biopsicosocial. El objetivo de este artículo es describir algunos de los posibles factores de riesgo que hacen que los niños y adolescentes con ACI sean especialmente vulnerables a experimentar el aislamiento físico, social y/o psicológico, así como las estrategias de afrontamiento más comúnmente utilizadas por ellos para intentar superar estas situaciones de estrés. Los resultados señalan como principales factores de riesgo la disincronía y complejidad cognitiva con respecto a sus iguales, patrones de amistad diferentes y una mayor conectividad dentro del sistema de mentalización. Las estrategias de afrontamiento social más utilizadas por esta población en respuesta a la percepción de los efectos sociales negativos son negar el talento, minimizar la popularidad y la conformidad con los demás.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baudson, T. G. (2016). The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 368. https:/doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368
  • Buttelmann, F. y Karbach, J. (2017). Development and Plasticity of Cognitive Flexibility in Early and Middle Childhood. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1040. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01040
  • Cacioppo, J. T. y Cacioppo, S. (2014). Social Relationships and Health: The Toxic Effects of Perceived Social Isolation. Social psychology, 8(2), 58-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12087
  • Cavilla, D. (2019). Maximizing the potential of gifted learners through a developmental framework of affective curriculum. Gifted Education International, 35(2), 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261429418824875
  • Cera Guy, J., Williams, J. y Shore, B. (2019). High- and Otherwise-Achieving Students’ Expectations of Classroom Group Work: An Exploratory Empirical Study. Roeper Review, 41(3), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1622166
  • Chichekian, T. y Shore, B. M. (2017). Hold Firm: Gifted Learners Value Standing One’s Ground in Disagreements With a Friend. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217701020
  • Cross, J. R., y Cross, T. L. (2015), Clinical and Mental Health Issues in Counseling the Gifted Individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
  • Cross, J. R., Vaughn, C. T., Mammadov, S., Cross, T. L., Kim, M., O’Reilly, C., Spielhagen, F. R., Da costa, M. P. y Hymer, B. (2019). A Cross-Cultural Study of the Social Experience of Giftedness. Roeper Review, 41(4), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1661052
  • Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). The pain of social disconnection: examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3231
  • Eren, F., Çete, A. Ö., Avcil, S. y Baykara, B. (2018). Emotional and Behavioral Characteristics of Gifted Children and Their Families. Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 55(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2017.12731
  • Espelage, D. L. y King, M. T. (2018). Bullying and the gifted. En S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick y M. Foley-Nicpon (eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 659–669). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-043
  • Freeman, J. (2005). Counselling the Gifted and Talented. Gifted Education International, 19(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940501900307
  • French, L. R., Walker, C. L. y Shore, B. M. (2011). Do gifted students really prefer to work alone? Roeper Review, 33(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.580497
  • Gómez-León, M. I. (2019). Psicobiología de las altas capacidades. Una revisión actualizada. Psiquiatría biológica, 26(3), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psiq.2019.09.001
  • Gómez-Pérez, M. M., Mata-Sierra, S., García-Martín, M., Calero-García, M.D., Molinero-Caparrósa, C. y Bonete-Románc, S. (2014). Valoración de un programa de habilidades interpersonales en niños superdotados. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70007-X
  • Gotlieb, R., Hyde, E., Immordino-Yang M. H. y Kaufman, S. B. (2016). Cultivating the social–emotional imagination in gifted education: insights from educational neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1377(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13165
  • Guthrie, K. H. (2019). “Nothing is ever easy”: Parent Perceptions of Intensity in Their Gifted Adolescent Children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2080-2101. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol24/iss8/16.
  • Guy, C. J., Williams, J. y Shore, B. (2019). High- and Otherwise-Achieving Students’ Expectations of Classroom Group Work: An Exploratory Empirical Study, Roeper Review, 41(3), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1622166
  • Gyarmathy, É. y Senior, J. (2018). La inclusión de múltiples estudiantes superdotados excepcionales en los programas de desarrollo de talento: síntesis de interacción tanto de la forma de provisión como del contenido. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416656500
  • Haberlin, S. (2015). Don’t stress: What do we really know about teaching gifted children to cope with stress and anxiety? Gifted and Talented International, 30(1-2), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137465
  • Hertberg-Davis, H. y Callahan, C. M. (2008). A Narrow Escape: Gifted Students’ Perceptions of Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319705
  • Higgins-Biss, K. (2009). A Parent’s Guide to Gifted Children. Webb, J. T., Gore, J. L., Amend, E. R., y DeVries, A. R. (2007). Roeper Review, 31(4), 243-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190903177614
  • Jumper, R. L. (2019). Communicating about bullying: Examining disclosure among gifted students. Gifted Education International, 35(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429418824113
  • Karpinski, R. I., Kolb, A. M. K., Tetreault, N. A. y Borowski, T. B. (2018). High intelligence: A risk factor for psychological and physiological overexcitabilities. Intelligence, 66, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.09.001
  • King, J., Shute, R. y McLachlan, A. (2019). Experiences of Difference: A Phenomenological Study With Intellectually Gifted Pre-Adolescent/Early Adolescent Boys and Their Mothers. Roeper Review, 41(3), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1622164
  • Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A. y Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(5), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371005500503
  • Košir, K., Horvat, M., Aram, U. y Jurinec, N. (2016). Is being gifted always an advantage? Peer relations and self-concept of gifted students, High Ability Studies, 27(2), 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1108186
  • Mackintosh, N. J. (2004). The Scientific Study of General Intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen: H. Nyborg (Ed.) (2003). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. ISBN: 0-08-043793-1. Pp. xxvi+642. Intelligence, 32(2), 217-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2003.10.002
  • Ogurlu, U., Yalin, H. S. y Yavuz Birben, F. (2018). The Relationship Between Psychological Symptoms, Creativity, and Loneliness in Gifted Children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218763968
  • Padgett, D. A. y Glaser, R. (2003). How stress influences the immune response. Trends in Immunology, 24(8), 444-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00173-x
  • Pfeiffer, S. I. (2018). Handbook of Giftedness in Children (2ª ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8
  • Reis, S. M. y Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119 – 130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144
  • Rinn, A. N. (2018). Social and emotional considerations for gifted students. En S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick y M. Foley-Nicpon (eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 453-464). American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0000038-029
  • Schmälzle, R., O’Donnell, M., García, J. O., Cascio, C. N., Bayer, J., Bassett, D. S., Vettel, J. M. y Falk, E. B. (2017). Brain connectivity dynamics during social interaction reflect social network structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(20), 5153–5158. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616130114
  • Schneider, B. H., Woodburn, S., del Pilar Soteras del Toro, M. y Udvari, S. J. (2005). Cultural and Gender Differences in the Implications of Competition for Early Adolescent Friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2005.0013
  • Shaughnessy, M. F. (2019). The SAGE Handbook of Gifted and Talented Education. Wallace, B., Sisk, D. A., & Senior, J. (Eds.). (2018). Roeper Review, 41(1), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1553100
  • Shaunessy, E. y Suldo, S. M. (2010). Strategies Used by Intellectually Gifted Students to Cope With Stress During Their Participation in a High School International Baccalaureate Program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355977
  • Shechtman, Z. y Silektor, A. (2012) Social competencies and difficulties of gifted children compared to nongifted peers. Roeper Review, 34(1), 63-72 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.627555
  • Shore, B., Chichekian, T., Gyles, P. y Walker, C. (2018). Friendships of gifted children and youth: updated insights and understanding. En B. Wallace, D. Sisk y J. Senior (eds.), The Sage Handbook of gifted and talented education (pp. 184-195). SAGE. https://doi.org10.4135/9781526463074.n17
  • Stadtfeld, C., Vörös, A., Elmer, T., Boda, Z. y Raabe, I. J. (2019). Integration in emerging social networks explains academic failure and success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(3), 792-797. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811388115
  • Terrassier, J. C. (2009). Les enfants intellectuellement précoces. Archives de Pédiatrie, 16(12), 1603-1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2009.07.019
  • Walker, C. L. y Shore, B. M. (2011). Theory of Mind and Giftedness: New Connections. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 644–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400406
  • Woodward, J. C. y Kalyan-Masih, V. (1990). Loneliness, coping strategies and cognitive styles of the gifted rural adolescent. Adolescence, 25(100), 977–988.
  • Yu, C., Li, J., Liu, Y., Qin, W., Li, Y., Shu, N., Jiang, T. y Li, K. (2008). White matter tract integrity and intelligence in patients with mental retardation and healthy adults. Neuroimage, 40(4), 1533–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.063
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet