More than personal narratives in English academic lectures

Referencias bibliográficas

• Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Longman.
• Bhatia, V. K. 2001. “Analysis genre: some conceptual issues”. Academic writing in context. Implications and applications. Ed. M. Hewings. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press. 79-92.
• Chaudron, C. and J. C. Richard. 1986. “The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures”. Applied Linguistics 7 (2): 113-127.
• Dubois, B. L. 1980. “Genre and structure of biomedical speeches”. Forum Linguisticum 5: 140-169.
• Dyer, J. and D. Keller-Cohen. 2000. “The discursive construction of professional self through narratives of personal experience”. Discourse Studies 2 (3): 283-304.
• Fløttum, K. 2005. “The self and the others. Polyphonic visibility in research articles”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 29-44.
• Fortanet. I. 2004. “The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: reference and function”. English for Specific Purposes 23 (1): 45-66.
• Fortanet-Gómez, I., J. C. Palmer-Silveria and M. F. Ruiz-Garrido. 2007. “Interaction through shared knowledge in American, British and Spanish business lectures”. Studies in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics. Eds. P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, M. Padilla Cruz, R. Gómez Morón and L. Fernández Amaya. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 91-109.
• Giménez, R. 2000. La Repetición Lingüística en el Género de la Clase Magistral: El Inglés Académico en el Ámbito de las Ciencias Sociales. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. València: Universitat de València.
• Grimes, J. E. 1975. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
• Hunston, S. and G. Thompson, eds. 2000. Evaluation in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
• Juzwik, M. M. 2006. “Performing curriculum: Building ethos through narrative in pedagogical discourse”. Teachers College Recording 108 (4): 489-528.
• Labov, W., 1972. “The transformation of experience in narrative syntax”. Language in the inner city. Ed. W. Labov. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 354-405.
• Labov, W. and J. Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experiences”. Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Ed. J. Helm. Seattle: American Ethnological Society. 12-44.
• Martin, J. R., and P. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Myers, G. 1990. Writing Biology. Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: Univeristy of Wisconsin Press.
• Myers, G. 1994. Narratives of science and nature in popularizing molecular genetics. Advances in written text analysis. Ed. M. Coulthard. London: Routledge. 179-190.
• Querol Julián, M. 2010. Narratives in English academic lectures: a cross-disciplinary study. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
• Simpson, R. C., S. L. Briggs, J. Oven and J. M. Swales. 1999. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor: Regents of the University of Michigan. [Available at http://www.lsa.umich.edu/eli/micase.html].
• Strodt-López, B. 1987. “Personal anecdotes in university classes”. Anthropological Linguistics 29 (2): 194-269.
• Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Thompson, S. 2002. “‘As the story unfolds’: The use of narratives in research presentations”. The language of conferencing. Eds. E. Ventola, C. Shalom and S. Thompson. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 147-167.
• Weissberg, B. 1993. “The graduate seminar. Another research-process genre”. English for Specific Purposes 12 (1): 23-35.