Attentional differences between gaze and arrows processingwhere vs what are eyes looking at

  1. Belén Aranda Martín 1
  2. María Ángeles Ballesteros Duperón 1
  3. Juan Lupiáñez 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Granada
    info

    Universidad de Granada

    Granada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04njjy449

Revue:
Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

ISSN: 1576-8597

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 44

Número: 2

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20350/DIGITALCSIC/15274 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental

Résumé

A gaze is a complex stimulus that provides valuable social information during human interactions. It shares the ability to orient attention with other nonsocial stimuli, such as arrows, but, still, gaze generates unique effects. A clear example was found using a spatial interference task (Marotta et al, 2018). Participants had to identify the direction—left or right—indicated by arrows or eyes located either on the right or left side. Arrows, like other nonsocial stimuli, elicited a standard congruency effect, with faster responses to congruent location-direction trials than to incongruent ones. In contrast, gaze produced a reversed effect with faster responses to incongruent than to congruent trials. Socio-cognitive components of gaze processing could underlie this dissociation. Similar to a joint attention episode in everyday life, gaze would direct attention to a potentially relevant item. In congruent trials (i.e., left-located eyes looking to the left), gaze would orient attention outward, causing a slower response compared to incongruent trials where gaze would look to the central fixation point. With this study, we aimed at better understanding the underlying mechanisms of the reversed congruency effect of gaze by modifying the task—adding a bicolor frame—and its instructions. One group of 25 adults performed the task by identifying stimuli direction, as in previous studies. Another group had to identify the color to which stimuli were directed. We expected to find analogous congruency effects for arrows and gaze in the latter group since both stimuli would direct attention to color and held at this location, preventing gaze from seeking a potential attentional target during congruent trials. Although we found a reduced gaze effect, overall results were similar in both groups so the manipulation of instructions did not have the anticipated effect. The limitations of the study and the need for further investigations were discussed.

Références bibliographiques

  • Adams, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2003). Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial display of emotion. Psychological Science, 14(6), 644–647. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1479.x
  • Aranda-Martin, B., Ballesteros-Duperon, M. A., & Lupianez, J. (2022). What gaze adds to arrows: Changes in attentional response to gaze versus arrows in childhood and adolescence. Br J Psychol, 113(3), 718-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12552
  • Bruinsma, Y., Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2004). Joint attention and children with autism: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(3), 169–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20036
  • Callejas, A., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2014). Dorsal and ventral attention systems underlie social and symbolic cueing. J Cogn Neurosci, 26(1), 63-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00461.
  • Cañadas, E. & Lupiáñez, J. (2012). Spatial interference between gaze direction and gaze location: A study on the eye contact effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65 (8), 1586-1598.
  • Chacón-Candia, J.A., Román-Caballero, R., Aranda-Martín, B., Casagrande, M., Lupiáñez, J. and Marotta, A. (2023). Are there quantitative differences between eye-gaze and arrows cues? A meta- analytic answer to the debate and a call for qualitative differences. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 144,
  • Conty, L., Tijus, C., Hugueville, L., Coelho, E., & George, N. (2006). Searching for asymmetries in the detection of gaze contact versus averted gaze under different head views: A behavioural study. Spatial Vision, 19, 529–545.
  • Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
  • Dalmaso, M., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. (2020). Early saccade planning cannot override oculomotor interference elicited by gaze and arrow distractors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(5), 990–997. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01768-x
  • Edwards, S., Siebert, N., & Bayliss, A. P. (2020). Joint attention facilitates observed gaze direction discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819867901
  • Franchini, M., Glaser, B., Wilde, H. W. De, Gentaz, E., Eliez, S., & Schaer, M. (2017). Social orienting and joint attention in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. PLoS ONE, 12(6), 1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178859
  • Hemmerich, K., Narganes-Pineda, C., Marotta, A., Martin-Arevalo, E., Jimenez, L., & Lupiáñez, J. (2022). Gaze elicits social and nonsocial attentional orienting: An interplay of shared and unique conflict processing mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001015.
  • Hietanen, J. K., Myllyneva, A., Helminen, T. M., & Lyyra, P. (2016). The Effects of Genuine Eye Contact on Visuospatial and Selective Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, doi: 10.1037/xge0000199
  • Hietanen, J. K., Nummenmaa, L., Nyman, M. J., Parkkola, R., & Hämäläinen, H. (2006). Automatic attention orienting by social and symbolic cues activates different neural networks: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 33, 406–413.
  • Ishikawa, K., Oyama, T., Tanaka, Y., & Okubo, M. (2022, November 12). Can you make eye contact?: Perceiving social gaze produces the reversed congruency effect. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hbn2x
  • Jones, S. (2015). The mediating effects of facial expression on spatial interference between gaze direction and gaze location. J Gen Psychol, 142(2), 106-117. doi:10.1080/00221309.2015.1009822
  • Lee, M.D., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press. 19.
  • Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174– 207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959
  • Marotta, A., Aranda-Martín, B., De Cono, M., Ballesteros-Duperón, M. Á., Casagrande, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2022). Integration of Facial Expression and Gaze Direction in Individuals with a High Level of Autistic Traits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2798. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052798
  • Marotta, A., Lupiáñez, J., Martella, D., & Casagrande, M. (2012). Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: Two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 38(2), 326-335. doi:2011-12265-001 [pii] 10.1037/a0023959
  • Marotta, A., Román-Caballero, R., & Lupiáñez, J. (2018). Arrows don’t look at you: Qualitatively different attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1457-
  • Mckay, K. T., Grainger, S. A., Coundouris, S. P., Skorich, D. P., Phillips, L. H., & Henry, J. D. (2021). Visual Attentional Orienting by Eye Gaze: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Gaze-Cueing Effect. Psychological Bulletin, 147, 12(February), 1269–1289. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000353
  • Narganes-Pineda, C., Chica, A. B., Lupiáñez, J., & Marotta, A. (2022). Explicit vs. Implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. Eye-gaze spatial congruency effects. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01659-x
  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention*. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25 Quadflieg, S., Mason, M. F., & Neil Macrae, C. (2004). The owl and the pussycat: Gaze cues and visuospatial orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(5), 826–831. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196708
  • Román-Caballero, R., Marotta, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2021). Spatial interference triggered by gaze and arrows. The role of target background on spatial interference. Psicológica Journal, 42(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.2478/psicolj-2021-0010
  • Shepherd, S. V. (2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00005
  • Shultz, S., Klin, A., & Jones, W. (2018). Neonatal Transitions in Social Behavior and Their Implications for Autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 452–469. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.012.
  • Torres-Marín, J., Carretero-Dios, H., Acosta, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2017). Eye Contact and Fear of Being Laughed at in a Gaze Discrimination Task. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1954. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01954.
  • Vlamings, P. H. J. M., Stauder, J. E. A., Son, I. A. M. Van, & Mottron, L. (2005). Atypical Visual Orienting to Gaze- and Arrow-Cues in Adults with High Functioning Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(3). doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-3289-y.
  • Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
La source de données: Dialnet