Barreras de acceso a la educación infantil (0-3 años) para las familias en riesgo socialun análisis de los discursos de familias y profesionales en cinco áreas metropolitanas de España

  1. David Poveda
  2. Karmele Mendoza Pérez
  3. Mitsuko Matsumoto
Revue:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496,  1988-2793

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 34

Número: 2

Pages: 427-436

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.79380 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista complutense de educación

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

It is well recognized internationally and in Spain that children from “vulnerable” family backgrounds participate less in quality early childhood education and care (ECEC). The objective of the article is to examine the barriers faced by families at social risk or in a situation of poverty for the enrollment of their 0 to 3 years old children in the first cycle of ECEC in different Spanish autonomous communities. A qualitative study has been implemented in 2019 in five localities / metropolitan areas: Madrid, Valencia, Barcelona, the Basque Country and Seville. We have carried out semi-structured interviews with 35 families and discussion groups or group interviews with 40 technicians-key informants. The collected data have been transcribed and analyzed within a qualitative-inductive analytical logic, in particular following thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2012, 2021). A wide range of factors that prevent access to ECEC 0-3 in Spain are identified, including organizational-bureaucratic, ideological, financial, and those related to issues of family mobility or the child-protection system. In addition, the importance of each of these barriers varies according to the socioeconomic level of the families. Our results coincide with other studies in organizing barriers into different categories but, at the same time, they suggest a more complex relationship between these elements, especially in relation to the socio-economic circumstances of the families.

Références bibliographiques

  • Anderson, S., y Mikesell, M. (2019). Child care type, access, and quality in rural areas of the United States: a review. Early Child Development and Care,189(11), 1812-1826. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2017.1412959
  • Archambault, J., Côté, D., y Raynault, M. F. (2020). Early childhood education and care access for children from disadvantaged backgrounds: Using a framework to guide intervention. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 345-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01002-x
  • Barco, B., y Carrasco, A. (2020). Access and equity policies in early childhood education: the case of Chile. Early Years, 40(4-5), 399-414. DOI: 10.1080/09575146.2020.1742097
  • Booth, A. (2014). Child care in the 1990s: Trends and consequences. Routledge.
  • Bove, C., y Sharmahd, N. (2020). Beyond invisibility. Welcoming children and families with migrant and refugee background in ECEC settings. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1707940
  • Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. En H. Cooper (ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. research designs (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.
  • Braun, V. y Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-47. DOI: 10.1002/capr.12360
  • Bucaite-Vilke, J. (2021). Family choices on welfare and territorial disadvantages: The perception of the child care services approach in urban and rural areas. SAGE Open, 11(3), DOI: /doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032
  • Burchinal, M; Vandergrift, N; Pianta, R. y Mashburn, A. (2010). Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.004
  • Dearing, E., Zachrisson, H. D., Mykletun, A., y Toppelberg, C. O. (2018). Estimating the consequences of Norway’s national scale-up of early childhood education and care (beginning in infancy) for early language skills. Aera Open, 4(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1177/233285841875659
  • Echeita, G. y Fernández, M.L. (2017). El contexto educativo. Hacia una educación más inclusiva como contexto para el desarrollo de todo el alumnado. En B. Gutierrez y A. Brioso (coords.) Desarrollos diferentes. (pp. 202-215). UNED/Sanz y Torres.
  • European Commission (2018). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the development of childcare facilities for young children with a view to increase female labour participation, strike a work-life balance for working parents and bring about sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe (the “Barcelona objectives”). European Commission.
  • Heckman, J.J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900-2.
  • Jiménez-Delgado, M., Jareño-Ruiz, D., y El-Habib, B. (2016). La expansión de la educación infantil en España: entre la igualdad de oportunidades y la segregación. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 72, 19-44.
  • Kachi, Y., Kato, T., y Kawachi, I. (2020). Socio-economic disparities in early childhood education enrollment: Japanese population-based study. Journal of epidemiology, 30(3), 143-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20180216
  • Klinkhammer, N., y Berth, F. (2019). The education promise and its disillusion: Access barriers in early childhood institutions. On Education. Journal for Research and Debate, 2(6), 1-5. DOI: 10.17899/on_ed.2019.6.2
  • Kottelenberg, M. J., y Lehrer, S. F. (2013). New evidence on the impacts of access to and attending universal child-care in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 39(2), 263-286.
  • Lamb, C. S. (2020). Constructing early childhood services as culturally credible trauma-recovery environments: participatory barriers and enablers for refugee families. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(1), 129-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1707368
  • Lazzari, A., y Vandenbroeck, M. (2012). Literature review of the participation of disadvantaged children and families in ECEC services in Europe. En Bennet, J., Early childhood education and care (ECEC) for children from disadvantaged backgrounds: Findings from a European literature review and two case studies. European Commission.
  • Lipscomb, S. T. (2013). Increasing access to quality child care for children from low-income families: Families’ experiences. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(3), 411-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.12.020
  • Matsumoto, M., Poveda, D., Aliagas, C., Macías, B., Martínez, V., Mendoza, K. y Rodríguez, S. (2019). Estudio sobre las percepciones y barreras de acceso a la educación infantil de primer ciclo (0-3 años) en familias desfavorecidas. Papers infancia_c nº 24 , 1-47.
  • Nollenberger, N. y Rodriguez-Planas, N. (2011). Child care, maternal employment and persistence: A natural experiment from Spain. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5888, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1906191
  • OECD (2020). Early childhood education: Equity, quality and transitions - Report for the G20 education working group. OECD.
  • Petitclerc, A., Côté, S., Doyle, O., Burchinal, M., Herba, C., Zachrisson, H., Bovin, M., Tremblay, M., Tiemeier, H., Jaddoe, V. y Raat, H. (2017). Who uses early childhood education and care services? Comparing socioeconomic selection across five Western policy contexts. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 11(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.1186/s40723-017-0028-8
  • Scholz, A., Erhard, K., Hahn, S., y Harring, D. (2019). Inequalities in access to early childhood education and care in Germany. International Centre Early Childhood Education and Care - Working Paper 2, 1-86.
  • Telford, N. (2016). Can Canadian women have it all? How limited access to affordable child care restricts freedom and choice. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth/Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse, 8(1), 153-172.
  • Valiente, C. (2003). Central state child care policies in postauthoritarian Spain: Implications for gender and carework arrangements. Gender & Society, 17(2), 287-292. DOI: 10.1177/0891243202250849
  • Valiente, C. (2009). Child care in Spain after 1975: The educational rationale, the Catholic Church, and women in civil society. En K. Scheiwe y H. Willekens H. (eds.), Childcare and preschool development in Europe (pp. 72-87). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • van Huizen, T., y Plantenga, J. (2018). Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments. Economics of Education Review, 66, 206-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.08.001
La source de données: Dialnet