¿Qué comparten los académicos de un grupo de investigación? Un caso de estudio crítico

  1. Hernández-Soto, Roberto 1
  2. Gutiérrez-Ortega, Mónica 2
  3. Rubia-Avi, Bartolomé 2
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

Revista:
Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1575-0965

Ano de publicación: 2023

Título do exemplar: Laboratorios de investigación en el aula: principios y modelos educativos basados en la evidencia

Volume: 26

Número: 2

Páxinas: 115-127

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.6018/REIFOP.559611 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado

Resumo

El propósito de este estudio es investigar el contenido del intercambio de conocimiento entre los académicos. Se pretende realizar una contribución empírica a un aspecto prácticamente inédito en el contexto nacional (español) e internacional. Para ello se planteó un análisis exploratorio basado en un caso de estudio crítico. Se realizaron 16 entrevistas a miembros de un grupo de investigación de una universidad pública española. Los resultados revelan que los académicos intercambian elementos de carácter explícito, tácito y apoyo emocional relacionados con la docencia, la investigación y la transferencia de conocimiento. Se ha constatado que el intercambio se refiere preferentemente al ámbito de la investigación y que existen diferencias entre los investigadores senior y junior en cuanto al tipo de conocimiento y al apoyo emocional que dan y reciben. Este estudio demuestra que el carácter tácito del conocimiento puede dificultar su transferencia y que el apoyo emocional, como parte del apoyo social, puede favorecer las prácticas de intercambio entre los académicos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akosile, A., & Olatokun, W. (2020). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among academics in Bowen University, Nigeria. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(2), 410-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618820926
  • Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and innovation: the mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(5), 670-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381
  • Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018
  • Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Anwar, S. (2016). A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business, & Management, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744
  • Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164633
  • Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Charband, Y., & Navimipour, N. J. (2018). Knowledge sharing mechanisms in the education: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Kybernetes, 47(7), 1456-1490. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2017-0227
  • Cheng, M. Y., Ho, J. S. Y., & Lau, P. M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: A study of multimedia university, Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3), 313-324. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejkm/article/view/853
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4a ed.). Sage publications.
  • Fari, S. A., & Ocholla, D. (2015). Comparative assessment of information and knowledge sharing among academics in selected universities in Nigeria and South Africa. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 81(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.7553/81-1-1544
  • Fauzi, M. A., Nya-Ling, C. T., Thurasamy, R., Ojo, A. O., & Shogar, I. (2019b). Muslim academics’ knowledge sharing in Malaysian higher learning institutions. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(2), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0111
  • Fauzi, M. A., Tan, C. N. L., Thurasamy, R., & Ojo, A. O. (2019a). Evaluating academics’ knowledge sharing intentions in Malaysian public universities. Malaysian Journal of Library, & Information Science, 24(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.7
  • Fullwood, R., & Rowley, J. (2017). An investigation of factors affecting knowledge sharing amongst UK academics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1254-1271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0274
  • Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & Delbridge, R. (2013). Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300831
  • Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & McLean, J. (2019). Exploring the factors that influence knowledge sharing between academics. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(8), 1051-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1448928
  • Gottschalk, P. (2008). Knowledge Management. In M. E. Jennex, (Ed.) Knowledge management: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global.
  • Howell, K. E., & Annansingh, F. (2013). Knowledge generation and sharing in UK universities: a tale of two cultures? International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 32-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.003
  • Ipe, M. (2003) Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Human Development Review, 2(4), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303257985
  • Ku, M. (2019). Similarity-dissimilarity and social capital in research knowledge networks: explaining knowledge sharing in academic institutions. Knowledge Management Research, & Practice, 17(3), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1595986
  • Liao, S., Fei, W., & Chen, C. (2007). Knowledge sharing absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070739
  • Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. In N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4a ed., pp. 97-128) Sage publications.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4a ed.). Sage publications.
  • Nokkala, T., Aarnikoivu, M., & Kiili, J. (2022). Multidisciplinary peer-mentoring groups supporting knowledge sharing in doctoral education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 865-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1939142
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press.
  • Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3a ed.). Sage publications.
  • Phung, V.D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., Chandran, D., & Ha, B. M. (2019). Promoting knowledge sharing amongst academics: a case study from Vietnam. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 18(3), 1950032. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649219500321
  • Pyhältö, K., McAlpine, L., Peltonen, J., & Castello, M. (2017). How does social support contribute to engaging post-PhD experience? European Journal of Higher Education, 7(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1348239
  • Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A., & Ignatius, J. (2014). Assessing knowledge sharing among academics: A validation of the knowledge sharing behavior scale (KSBS). Evaluation Review, 38(2), 160-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X14539685
  • Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A. L., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning Institutions. Minerva, 51(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9229-7
  • Rowley, J. (2000). Is higher education ready for knowledge management? International Journal of Education Management, 14(7), 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010378978
  • Saad, A., & Haron, H. (2013). A case study of higher education academics’ shared knowledge and classification. 3rd International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2013.6716750
  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing, & Health,18(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
  • Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality, & Quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
  • Teddie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed method sampling: a typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
  • Vekkaila, J., Virtanen, V., Taina, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2018). The function of social support in engaging and disengaging experiences among post PhD researchers in STEM disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1439-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1259307
  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. (2010). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4a ed.). Sage Publications.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet