Aspectos preventivos en migraña y trabajoEncuesta europea

  1. María Teófila Vicente Herrero 1
  2. Mª Victoria Ramírez Iñiguez de la Torre 2
  3. Luis Reinoso Barbero 3
  4. Elena Ruiz de la Torre 4
  1. 1 Grupo Correos, Valencia, España.
  2. 2 Grupo Correos, Albacete, España.
  3. 3 Banco Santander, Madrid, España.
  4. 4 European Migraine Headache Alliance, Bruselas, Bélgica.
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales

ISSN: 1138-9672,  1578-2549

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 24

Número: 1

Páginas: 20-33

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.12961/APRL.2021.24.01.03 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales

Resumen

Introduction: Workplace health promotion integrates initiatives in health and safety in the occupational field, with personal improvements, increased productivity and lower risks and social cost, especially with respect to migraine headaches, a neurological disorder affecting approximately 11% of the population. The objective of this study was to know the preventive resources available to workers with migraine headaches and the preventive management options in their companies. Method: Cross-sectional observational study of 3,342 patients from Spain, Italy, France, Portugal, Ireland, United Kingdom, Germany and other European Union countries, conducted through an anonymous survey on the web of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA-web), from September 2018 to January 2019. Results: Occupational stress (77.65%) and use of computer monitors (63.87%) are the most common risks described by workers with migraine. About. 43.71% of workers are not familiar with the type of occupational health service present in their company, 49.06% do not have a medical service; 67.67% reported no work-related limitations due to migraine, neither dismissal nor non-renewal of their contract (88.29%), but 42.14% had experienced some conflict due to decreased productivity; 26.54% were unaware of the concept of vulnerable workers or had not requested this status because of their migraine (63.8%), nor had they demanded job accommodations (67.64%) or job change (80.89%); 55.42% did not feel understood or supported by their company in their limitations due to migraine, although they did feel they were supported by their colleagues (63.07%). Conclusion: We found that preventive resources and information were deficient, and that there was little use of adaptive management options for workers with migraine in their companies.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Street TD, Lacey SJ. Accounting for employee health: The productivity cost of leading health risks. Health Promot J Austr. 2019;30:228-37.
  • Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP. Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:307-15.
  • Vicente-Herrero MT, Ruiz de la Torre E, Reinoso Barbero L. Trabajo y migraña. Encuesta europea. Medicina Balear. 2019;34:30-7.
  • Vicente-Herrero MT, Ramírez Iñiguez de la Torre MV, Ruiz de la Torre E, Reinoso Barbero L. Migraine medical control and related variables. Results of the European Work and Migraine survey. Semergen. 2020;46:225-33
  • Vicente-Herrero MT, Ramírez Iñiguez de la Torre MV, Ruiz de la Torre E, Reinoso Barbero L. Tratamiento sintomático en migraña. Fármacos utilizados y variables relacionadas. Resultados de la encuesta europea sobre trabajo y migraña. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2020;27:178-91
  • Vicente-Herrero MT, Ramírez-Iñiguez de la Torre MV, Ruíz-de la Torre E, Reinoso-Barbero L. Preventive Treatment In Migraine. Used Drugs And Related Variables. Results Of The European Work And Migraine Survey. Rev Mex Neuroci. 2020;21:82-9.
  • Burton WN, Chen CY, Li X, McCluskey M, Erickson D, Schultz AB. Evaluation of a Workplace-Based Migraine Education Program. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Aug;58(8):790-5.
  • Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Diamond S, Diamond ML, Reed ML. Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001; 41: 646-57.
  • Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Liberman J. Variation in migraine prevalence by race. Neurology. 1996; 47: 52-9
  • Slater ND, Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Doctor-patient communication about migraine disability. Neurology. 1999; 52 (Suppl 2): 209.
  • Lipton RB, Stewart WF, MacGregor A. Communication of migraine disability between physicians and patients. Cephalalgia. 1999; 19: 337.
  • Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Simon D, Liberman J, Von Korff M. Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 1999;79:291-301
  • Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner K, Liberman J, Sawyer J. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia. 1999;19:107-14.
  • Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Sawyer J. An international study to assess the reliability of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology. 1999;52:988-94.
  • Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB, Sawyer J, Lee C, Liberman JN. Validity of the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain. 2000;88:41-52.
  • Min Y, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011;31:357-67.
  • Porta-Etessam J, López-Gil J, Matías-Guiu A, Fernández C, en representación del Comité Científico del Programa PALM. Validación de un cuestionario diagnóstico para migraña adaptado para encuesta telefónica asistida por ordenador. Neurologia. 2010;25:163-7.
  • Xie W, Li R, He M, Cui F, Sun T, Xiong J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with headache amongst medical staff in South China. J Headache Pain. 2020;14;21:5.
  • Santos IS, Griep RH, Alves MG, Goulart AC, Lotufo PA, Barreto SM, et al. Job stress is associated with migraine in current workers: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Eur J Pain. 2014;18:1290-7.
  • González Quintanilla V, Toriello Suárez M, Gutiérrez González S, Rojo López A, González Suárez A, Viadero Cervera R, et al. Stress at work in migraine patients: differences in attack frequency. Neurologia. 2015;30:83-9.
  • Li C, Zhang L, Zhou J, Fan Z, Wang Y, Wang X, et al. Prevalence of primary headache disorders among information technology staff in China: the negative effects of computer use and other correlative factors. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:443.
  • Rauschel V, Straube A, Süß F, Ruscheweyh R. Responsiveness of the autonomic nervous system during paced breathing and mental stress in migraine patients. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:82.
  • Chądzyński P, Kacprzak A, Domitrz W, Domitrz I. Migraine headache facilitators in a population of Polish women and their association with migraine occurrence - preliminary results. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2019;53:377-83.
  • Berry PA. Migraine disorder: workplace implications and solutions. AAOHN J. 2007;55:51-6.
  • Antonov K, Isacson D. Headache in Sweden: the importance of working conditions. Headache. 1997;37:228-34.
  • Allen D, Hines EW, Pazdernik V, Konecny LT, Breitenbach E. Four-year review of presenteeism data among employees of a large United States health care system: a retrospective prevalence study. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16:59.
  • Raggi A, Covelli V, Guastafierro E, Leonardi M, Scaratti C, Grazzi L et al. Validation of a self-reported instrument to assess work-related difficulties in patients with migraine: the HEADWORK questionnaire. J Headache Pain. 2018;19:85.
  • Martínez-Fernández A, Rueda Vega M, Quintas S, de Toledo Heras M, Díaz de Terán J, Latorre González G, et al. Psychosocial repercussion of migraine: is it a stigmatized disease? Neurol Sci. 2020;41:2207-13.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet