La narrativa populista en las redes socialeslas elecciones generales en España de noviembre de 2019 en Twitter

Bibliographic References

• Alonso-Muñoz, L., y Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018).Communication of European populist leaders on Twitter: Agenda setting and the ‘more is less’ effect.
• Bracciale, R., y Martella, A. (2017). Define the populist political communication style: the case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310-1329.
• Buccoliero, L., Bellio, E., Crestini, G., y Arkoudas, A. (2020). Twitter and politics: Evidence from the US presidential elections 2016. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(1), 88-114.
• Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 25-44). Springer.
• Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018). Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future.
• Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Influence of media on the political conversation on Twitter: Activity, popularity, and authority in the digital debate in Spain.
• Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, (CIS). (2019). Barómetro 3267.
• Charaudeau, P. (2009). Reflexiones para el análisis del discurso populista. Discurso & Sociedad, 3(2), 253-279.
• Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., y Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109-1126.
• Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., y Larsson, A. O. (2017a). Populist online communication:introduction to the special issue.Information,Communication & Society: Populist Online Communication,20(9),1279-1292.
• Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., y Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347-1364.
• Fernández-García, B y Valencia Sáiz, Á (2022). De la calle a las instituciones (2014-2019) Revista de estudios políticos, 195, 97-123
• Frazé, J. (2017) La trayectoria del discurso de Podemos. Revista española de ciencia política, 44 219-246
• Gaetano, M. (1939). The ruling class. Translated by Hannan Kahn. New York and London: McGraw Hill Company,
• Guan, Y., y del Rey Morató, J. (2017). Los juegos de lenguaje de Perón: Un enfoque conceptual sobre el populismo latinoamericano. Más Poder Local, (32), 52-61.
• Jacobs, K., y Spierings, N. (2019). A populist paradise? Examining populist. Twitter adoption and use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(12), 1681-1696.
• Kotler, P., Kartajaya, H., y Setiawan, I. (2021). Marketing 5.0: Technology for humanity. John Wiley & Sons.
• Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista.
• Laclau, E., y Mouffe, C. (1987). Hegemonía y estrategia socialista.
• Lakoff, G., y Turner, M. (2009). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago press.
• Larsson, A. O. (2019). Winning and losing on social media: Comparing viral political posts across platforms. Convergence.
• Larsson, A. O. (2020). Fear and loathing on Facebook? Tracking the rise of populism and platformization in viral political Facebook posts. First Monday.
• López-Meri, A., Marcos-García, S., y Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). ¿Qué hacen los políticos en Twitter? Estrategias comunicativas en la campaña electoral española de 2016. Profesional De La Información, 26(5), 795-804.
• Martínez-Bascuñán,M. (2016).Misgivings on Deliberative Democracy. World Political Science,12(2),195-218.
• Moffitt, B. (2020). The global rise of populism. Stanford University Press.
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition.
• Mudde, C., y Kaltwasser, C.R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147-174.
• O’Brien, H. L., y Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 938-955.
• Rodríguez-Andrés, R. (2018). Trump 2016: ¿Presidente gracias a las redes sociales? Palabra Clave, 21(3), 831-859.
• Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., y Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: an overview of populist, far right, far left, and Eurosceptic parties in Europe.
• Salmon, C. (2008). Storytelling: La fabbrica delle storie. Fazi.
• Salmon, C. (2013). Storytelling: la machine à fabriquer des histoires et à formater les esprits. La Découverte.
• Salmon, C. (2017). Storytelling: Bewitching the modern mind. Verso Books.
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2019). Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. Oxford University Press.
• Taggart, P. A., y Parkin, F. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.
• Taguieff, P. (2007). L’illusion populiste: essai sur les démagogies de l’âge démocratique. Flammarion.
• Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek.
• Vallespín, F., y Martínez-Bascuñán, M. (2017). Populismos (2018th ed.). Alianza Editorial.
• Waisbord, S., y Amado, A. (2017). Populist communication by digital means: presidential Twitter in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society.
• Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 1-22.
• Wirth, W., Esser, F., Wettstein, M., Engesser, S., Wirz, D., Schulz, A., Ernst, N., Büchel, F., Caramani, D., y Manucci, L. (2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies, and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. NCCR Democracy Working Paper Series, (88)
• Žižek, S. (1992). Looking awry: An introduction to Jacques Lacan through popular culture