Las obras y autores de mayor relevancia en el estudio científico del Cine y Fotografía:enseñanza, impacto académico y análisis de co-citación

  1. McGowan, Nadia 1
  2. Repiso, Rafael 1
  3. Montero Díaz, Julio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Intercional de La Rioja
Revista:
Fotocinema: revista científica de cine y fotografía

ISSN: 2172-0150

Any de publicació: 2022

Títol de l'exemplar: Recuerdos visuales fotográficos

Número: 25

Pàgines: 381-410

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Fotocinema: revista científica de cine y fotografía

Resum

Most bibliometric studies use indexed databases, such as Web of Scienceor Scopus, for their analysis. This text proposes the use of non-sourceitemsas a starting point to analyse which are the most relevant worksand authorsin the field of Film and Photography. Open Syllabusis used to identify the most widely used works in university teaching in these fields, and these are categorised according to whether they are essays, technical manuals, theoretical manuals or films. The identified works are consulted in Web of Scienceto measure their academic impact through the number of citations. A co-citation analysis is then performed.The results indicate that theoretical and practical manuals have little scientific impact, while essays are cited in scientific publications. A limited corpus of audiovisual works also has an impact, but this is limited to feature films by a small group of classic directors. In terms of subject matter, Film Theory and Photography prevail over other specialities. The co-citation analysis identifies six clusters of related topics. The list of the most cited books and the most prevalent authors in each cluster allows us to draw a map of essential documents for the study of Film and Photography

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • BBarthes, R. (1980). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Hill and Wang.
  • Batagelj, V. (2008). Analysis of large networks with pajek. Networks, 94, 22-27.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et simulation. Galilée.
  • Benjamin, W. (1985). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. Schocken.
  • Bolter, J. David & Grusin, Richard A. (1998). Remediation: Understanding new media.MIT Press.
  • Bordwell, D. & Thompson, K. (1979). Film art: An introduction. Addison-Wesley.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). Photography: A middle-brow art. Polity Press.
  • Braudy, L. (2016). Film theory and criticism: Introductory readings. Oxford University Press Inc.
  • Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. Peter Lang.
  • Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(2), 327-343. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0024-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0024-1
  • Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.
  • Deleuze, G. (1983). Cinéma 1: l'image-mouvement. Éd. de Minuit.
  • Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2: l'image-temps. Éd. de Minuit. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350251991
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London; New York: Longman.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
  • Genette, G. (1979). Narrative discourse: Gerard genette. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hall, S. (1980). Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. London: Unwin Hyman.
  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Milton keynes: The Open University.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
  • Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
  • Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.
  • Kress, G. (2007). Multimodality : A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Reading images : The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse : The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1993). Talk on television: Audience partecipation and public debate. Routledge.
  • London, B., & Stone, J. (2010). A short course in digital photography. Prentice Hall.
  • London, B., & Stone, J. (2019). A short course in photography. Pearson.
  • London, B., Stone, J., & Upton, J. (2017). Photography. Boston: Pearson.
  • Manovich, L. (2000). The language of new media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • McGowan, N.; Repiso, R. & Montero, J. (2022a). Documentos de Cine y Fotografía más citados en Open Syllabus, clasificados por tipo de documento y especialidad. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5897236
  • McGowan, N.; Repiso, R. & Montero, J. (2022b). Número de citas por autor, porcentaje y tipo de documento de los libros analizados en la categoría de Cine y Fotografía de Open Syllabus. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5897326
  • McGowan, N.; Repiso, R. & Montero, J. (2022c). Número de citas en WoS para los 100 primeros documentos de Cine y Fotografía en Open Syllabus. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5897359)
  • McLuhan, M. (1963). Understanding media; the extensions of man McGraw Hill.
  • Metz, C. (1974). Language and cinema. The Hague: Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816044
  • Metz, C. (1977). Essais sémiotiques. Klincksieck.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (1980). The language of images. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (2010). Iconology : Image, text, ideology.
  • Mollison, M. (2020). Producing videos: A complete guide. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. Recuperado de https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781003116844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116844
  • Moreno-Delgado, A., Repiso, R., & Montero-Díaz, J. (2020). Analysis of networks of academic output on television programming. Icono14, 18(1), 123-154. doi:https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1484
  • Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
  • Mulvey, L. (1996). Fetishism and curiosity. BFI.
  • Mulvey, L. (2005). Death 24x a second : Stillness and the moving image. Reaktion.
  • Opensyllabus.org. (2021). About open syllabus. Recuperado de https://blog.opensyllabus.org/about-the-open-syllabus-project/
  • Repiso, R. & Montero, J. (2019). Edición impresa tradicional, digital, bajo demanda y auto-sufragada: cuatro modelos de edición de libros que requieren ser evaluados de manera diferente. Bibliotecas. Anales de investigación, 15(1), 5-9.
  • Repiso, R., Ahedo, J., & Montero, J. (2018). The presence of the encyclicals in web of science: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 115(1), 487-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2636-z
  • Sontag, S. (1973). On photography. Penguin Books.
  • Sternberg, M. (1971). Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Hebrew University.
  • Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2021). How to shape academic freedom in the digital age? Are the retraactions of opinionated papers a prelude to “cancel culture” in academia? Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100035
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer , a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  • Van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (2001). Handbook of visual analysis. Sage.
  • Voice & vision A creative approach to narrative film and DV production. (2017). [Place of publication not identified]: Routledge.
  • Welles, O. (1941). Citizen Kane. RKO Radio Pictures.
  • Wells, L. (2015). Photography: A critical introduction. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727370
  • Williams, L. (1999). Hard core : Power, pleasure, and the "frenzy of the visible". University of California Press.
  • Williams, L. (2008). Screening sex. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388630
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet