Blockchain-Based Land Registry Platforms: A Survey on Their Implementation and Potential Challenges
- Mezquita, Yeray 12
- Parra-Domínguez, Javier 12
- Pérez-Pons, María E 12
- Prieto, Javier
- Manuel Corchado, Juan
- 1 BISITE Digital Innovation Hub, University of Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain
- 2 AIR Institute, IoT Digital Innovation Hub, Salamanca, 37007, Spain
ISSN: 1368-9894
Ano de publicación: 2022
Volume: Special issue CISIS 2020-IGPL
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Logic Journal of the IGPL
Resumo
In recent years it has been demonstrated that the use of the traditional property registry models involves the risk of corruption along with long waiting times. This paper points out the main problems associated with conventional models and makes a survey of the new ones that are based on blockchain technology. This type of model is already being developed as a proof of concept by different countries. With the use of this technology in land registry systems, it is possible to improve the transparency of the processes as well as optimize costs and execution time. To show the theoretical results of this study, the Spanish land registry has been taken as an example of a use case scenario.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Arslanian, (2019), The Future of Finance, pp. 113, 10.1007/978-3-030-14533-0_10
- Cano, (2017), Social Blockchain Revolution
- Chiodelli, (2015), Town Planning Review, 86, pp. 437, 10.3828/tpr.2015.27
- Collindres, (2016), Fundacion Eleutra, Honduras
- Dinh, (2018), Computer, 51, pp. 48, 10.1109/MC.2018.3620971
- Doig, (2010), Journal of Financial Crime, 17, pp. 9, 10.1108/13590791011009347
- Finch, (2019)
- Francisco, (2019), Expert Systems with Applications, 129, pp. 68, 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.056
- Gatteschi, (2018), Future Internet, 10, pp. 20, 10.3390/fi10020020
- González-Briones, (2018), Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018, 10.1155/2018/6089280
- Jiménez, (2012), Lex Localis, 10, pp. 363
- Kshetri, (2018), It Professional, 20, pp. 11, 10.1109/MITP.2018.021921645
- Lazuashvili, (05 2019), A case study of Georgia
- Lazuashvili, (2019), International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 219
- Mavilia, (2019), African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, pp. 1
- McMurren, (2018), Blockchain Technologies for Social Change
- Mezquita, (2019), International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 205
- Mezquita, (2019), Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing (AETiC), 3, pp. 17, 10.33166/AETiC.2019.05.003
- Mezquita, Logic Journal of the IGPL
- Mezquita, (2019), The 2019 XXVII International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), pp. 1
- Mezquita, (2019), International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence, pp. 89
- Mezquita, (2019), International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, pp. 525
- Reque, (2019)
- Notheisen, (2017), Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59, pp. 425, 10.1007/s12599-017-0499-8
- Ølnes, (2017), International Conference on Electronic Government, pp. 215, 10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_18
- Raikwar, (2018), The 2018 9th IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), pp. 1, 10.1109/NTMS.2018.8328731
- Rose, (2000), British Journal of Criminology, 40, pp. 321, 10.1093/bjc/40.2.321
- Shang, (2019), Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 12, pp. 72, 10.1162/inov_a_00276
- Ho, (2002), Public Administration Review, 62, pp. 434, 10.1111/0033-3352.00197
- Valdeolmillos, (2019), International Congress on Blockchain and Applications, pp. 153
- West, (2004), Public Administration Review, 64, pp. 15, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
- Wörner, (2014), Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, pp. 295, 10.1145/2638728.2638786
- Yildiz, (2007), Government Information Quarterly, 24, pp. 646, 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002