Perfil de acceso a la universidad de los maestros en España

  1. Inmaculada Asensio Muñoz 1
  2. Delia Arroyo Resino 2
  3. Judit Ruiz-Lázaro 3
  4. María Sánchez-Munilla 1
  5. Covadonga Ruiz de Miguel 1
  6. Alexander Constante-Amores 3
  7. Enrique Navarro-Asencio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Spain
  2. 2 Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR), Spain
  3. 3 Universidad Europea de Madrid (UEM), Spain
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

ISSN: 1139-613X,  2174-5374

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 25

Número: 2

Páginas: 39-63

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/EDUCXX1.31924 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Educación XX1: Revista de la Facultad de Educación

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

The training of those who have access to teaching studies is relevant due to the impact that teachers have on the performance of their students and on the quality of the educational system. In this context, the aim of this article is to describe the university access profile of Spanish teachers, using their pre-university academic performance as the main indicator, operationalized as the score in the common subjects of the university entrance exam. The profiles are analyzed according to the type of baccalaureate studied, the university degree chosen, and the autonomous community or city of origin, using descriptive statistics, contrast of means and the effect size of the differences and statistical power calculation, based on the data provided by the Sistema Integrado de Información Universitaria (SIIU) from 2014 to 2017 (N = 53818). In general, the average to access to university of the last four promotions of teachers is 5.782 and the 25.34% come from a STEM baccalaureate, frequently associated with higher averages in common tests, at the total sample and by communities, in general with small effect sizes. In addition, there are differences between degrees. Although results refer only to one of the multiples variables which impact to the teaching quality provide a current, comprehensive and clear overview of the academic profile of entry to teaching studies in Spain. The evidence found, despite it is not enough by itself, may be useful for decision-making about practice and educational policies related to the recruitment, selection and training of teachers, within the framework of what happens, internationally, in the most successful educational systems

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Asensio Muñoz, I., & Ruiz de Miguel, C. (2017). Medida y evaluación de las creencias sobre la profesión de los maestros en formación. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 20(3), 79-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/reifop.20.3.265231
  • Asensio Muñoz, I., Ruiz de Miguel, C., & Castro Morera, M. (2015). Formación de maestros e investigación educativa: la percepción de los estudiantes de grado en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 26, 217-236.
  • Arnholt, A. (2012). BSDA: Basic Statistics and Data Analysis.
  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) (2011). Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs.
  • Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Co.
  • Botella, J., & Sánchez, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y la salud. Síntesis.
  • Castro, M. (2021). Profesores para el siglo XXI: Perfil académico, formación inicial y prácticas docentes de los profesores españoles. Introducción. Revista de Educación, 393, 11-35. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-393-495
  • Castro-Rodríguez, E., & Montoro, A. (2021). Educación STEM y formación del profesorado de Primaria en España. Revista de Educación, 393, 253-378. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-393-497
  • Champely, S., Ekstrom, C., Dalgaard, P., Gill, J., Weibelzahl, S., Anandkumar, A., Ford, C., Volcic, R., & De Rosario, H. (2018). Package ‘pwr.’
  • Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., &. Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research. The Sutton Trust.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. LEA.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  • Denzler, S., & Wolter, S.C. (2009). Sorting into teacher education: How the institutional setting matters. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(4), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640903352440
  • Egido, I. (2020). El acceso a la formación docente inicial en Europa: políticas e investigación. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 35, 197–211. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.35.2020.24192
  • Fernández-Mellizo, M., & Constante-Amores, A. (2020) Determinantes del rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de nuevo acceso a la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Revista de Educación, 387, 213-240 https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-387-433
  • Fray, L., & Gore, J. (2018). Why people choose teaching: A scoping review of empirical studies, 2007–2016. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.009
  • Guarino, C. M., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173-208
  • Han, S. W. (2018). Who expects to become a teacher? The role of educational accountability policies in international perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.012
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Pace, R. R. (1995). Who chooses to teach (and why)? Economics of Education Review, 14(2), 101-117
  • Heinz, M. (2013). Tomorrow’s teachers–selecting the best: An exploration of the quality rationale behind academic and experiential selection criteria for initial teacher education programmes. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25, 93–114.
  • Jiménez, E., Arroyo, D., Hurtado-Martín, M., Ruiz-Lázaro, J., Sánchez-Munilla, M., Illana, J. J., & González, C. (2021). La nota de acceso a la universidad como predictor del rendimiento en el primer año de carrera: grados de Magisterio versus otras carreras asistenciales. Revista de Educación, 393, 129-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-393-488
  • Kerlinger, F. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research: Educational and psychological inquiry. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Lüdecke, D. (2019). Package ‘esc’.
  • McKenzie, P., & Santiago, P. (2005). Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers - Final report: Teachers matter. OECD
  • Measures of Effective Teaching (MET) Project (2010). Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the measures of effective teaching project.
  • Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2022). Documento para debate. 24 propuestas de reforma para la mejora de la profesión docente
  • Navarro, E., López-Martín, E., Asensio-Muñoz, I., Expósito-Casa, E., Carpintero-Molina, E., & Ruiz de Miguel, C. (2021). Meta-analysis of reliability generalization of the FIT-Choice questionnaire (Factors Influencing Teaching Choice). Revista de Educación, 393, 231-260. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-393-492
  • Nolla, A., Muñoz, R., Cerisola, A., & Fernández, B. (2021). La formación inicial de los maestros en matemáticas y su didáctica. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 96(35.1), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v96i35.1.85882
  • Pérez, L. (2015). Análisis de las pruebas de acceso a la formación de docentes en España y Finlandia: conocimientos o competencias. Revista Complutense de Educación, 26(3), 591-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.n3.44448
  • Perez-Felkner, L., McDonald, S. K., Schneider, B., & Grogan, E. (2012). Female and male adolescents’ subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors. Developmental psychology, 48(6), 1658.
  • R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  • Roloff-Henoch, J., Klussmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Who becomes a teacher? Challenging the “negative selection” hypothesis. Learning and Instruction, 36, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.005
  • Ruiz Lázaro, J., & González Barbera, C. (2017). Análisis de la Prueba de Lengua Castellana y Literatura que da acceso a la universidad. Comparación entre las comunidades autónomas. Bordón, 69(3), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2017. 50927
  • Ruiz-Lázaro, J., González Barbera, C., & Gaviria Soto, J.L. (2021). Las pruebas de inglés para acceder a la Universidad. Una comparación entre Comunidades Autónomas. Educación XX1, 24(1), 233-270, http://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.26746
  • Sánchez, E. (2009). Mitos y realidades en la carrera docente. Revista de Educación, 348, 465-488.
  • Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P.W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202.
  • Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., & Dunnington, D. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
  • Zamora, B., & Cabrera, L. (2015). La sociedad y el profesorado. Imágenes y opiniones sociales sobre el profesorado. RASE, 8(1), 86-107.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet