Maternidad tardía: Opción legítima, fruto de derechos civiles y constitucionales. Debate jurídico e intromisión ética en las redes sociales

  1. Patricia Craviotto Valle 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

Zeitschrift:
IUS ET SCIENTIA: Revista electrónica de Derecho y Ciencia

ISSN: 2444-8478

Datum der Publikation: 2017

Titel der Ausgabe: Convergencias y divergencias en bioderecho internacional

Ausgabe: 3

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 88-129

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2017.I02.06 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: IUS ET SCIENTIA: Revista electrónica de Derecho y Ciencia

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

The objective of this article is to encourage the reader -interested in legal and biotechnological aspects regarding late motherhood- to carry out a deep ethical and legal reflection in this regard. In the globalized world in which we live, social networks and the media -increasingly interactive- oblige us to take special care of and protect the new situations born of technological advances Without the spirit or pretense of convincing or modifying personal positions -and even professionals-, the writing of this writing is based on the concern that arises in the author of the same, when warning a continuous lack of generalized reflection on matters concerning fundamental rights of the person. Rights or legal possibilities that arise from personal freedom, and that can be distorted by social networks, influencing in a wrong way in the global set of current societies: very especially in the Spanish society.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • S. Chopra, A. Lotvin, D. Fisher. El Doctor Chopra dice: hechos médicos y mitos que todos deberíamos conocer. Penguin Random House Grupo. Editorial España, 25 abril 2012- 488 páginas.
  • M. Boladeras, ed. Bioética: la toma de decisiones. Editorial Proteus. Primera edición: Octubre 2011. 619 páginas.