Relationship between naming speed, cognitive processes and decoding skills in normal readers in primary education

  1. Alfredo E. Ramos-Tresguerres 1
  2. Rebeca Cerezo 2
  3. Débora Areces 2
  4. Celestino Rodríguez 2
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revue:
Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

ISSN: 1135-6405,  1578-4118

Année de publication: 2021

Volumen: 33

Número: 3

Pages: 486-504

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/11356405.2021.1949110 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: Culture and Education, Cultura y Educación

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

Learning to read is a complex challenge during childhood, so being aware of the processes that facilitate it is essential. Decoding skills, naming speed and their relationship to reading difficulties are part of these processes. This study aims to ascertain whether there is a relationship between naming speed, cognitive variables (processing speed and working memory) and decoding skills. The sample was made up of 42 students in the first, second, third and fourth years of primary education (62% males and 38% females) between the ages of six and 10. Hierarchical regression models showed that naming times significantly predict reading pseudo-words, while no significant relationship was found with cognitive variables. The usefulness of naming tasks is shown to be a good early predictor of reading, while no direct relationship between naming times and cognitive variables is detected.

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Aguilar, M., Navarro, J. I., Mechano, I., Alcale, C., Marchena, E., & Ramiro, P. (2010). Velocidad de nombrar y conciencia fonológica en el aprendizaje inicial de la lectura. Psicothema, 22(3), 436–442.
  • Alegría, J. (2006). Por un enfoque psicolingüístico del aprendizaje de la lectura y sus dificultades, 20 años después. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29(1), 93–111.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Antmann, D., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2008). Identifying and predicting classes of response to explicit phonological spelling instruction during independent composing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(3), 218–234.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). SPSS (Version 19.0)
  • Areces, D., García, T., González-Castro, P., Alvarez-García, D., & Rodríguez, C. (2018). Naming speed as a predictive diagnostic measure in reading and attentional problems. Child Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1115–1128.
  • Areces, D., Rodríguez Pérez, C., González-Castro, P., García, T., & Cueli, M. (2017). Naming Speed and its effect on attentional variables and reading errors depending on the diagnosis. Anales de Psicología, 33(2), 301–310.
  • Arnell, K. M., Joanisse, M. F., Klein, R. S., Busseri, M., & Tannock, R. (2009). Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 173–184.
  • Cisternas, Y., Ceccato, R., Llario, G., & Sanmillán, M. I. (2014). Funciones neuropsicológicas en las habilidades de inicio a la lectoescritura. International. Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 115–122.
  • Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). Prolec-r. Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores–Revisado. TEA.
  • Elosúa, M. R., García-Madruga, J. A., Gómez-Veiga, I., López-Escribano, C., Pérez, E., & Orjales, I. (2012). Reading skills and academic performance in 3rd and 6th of primary school: Developmental and educational aspects. Estudios de Psicología, 33(2), 207–218.
  • Escudero-Cabarcas, J. (2015). Cerebro, Mente y Lectura en la era de la información. Psicogente, 18(33), 1–43.
  • Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., Müller, K., & Cramon, D. Y. V. (2002). fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(1), 11–23.
  • García, T., González-Castro, P., Areces, D., Cueli, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). Study of Executive Functions. Implications of the type of assessment measures used for its validity in clinical and educational settings. Papeles del Psicólogo, 35(3), 215–223.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Cui, Y., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2013). Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 218–225.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2009). RAN components and reading develop-ment from Grade 3 to 5: What underlies their relationship? Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(6), 508–534.
  • Ghisi, M., Bottesi, G., Re, A. M., Cerea, S., & Mammarella, I. C. (2016). Socioemotional features and resilience in Italian University Students with and without Dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9.
  • Gómez, F. R., González, A. A., Zarabozo, D., & Amano, M. (2010). La velocidad de denominación de letras: el mejor predictor temprano del desarrollo lector en español. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(46), 823–847.
  • Haight, S. L. (2006). Test review: Wagner, RK, Torgesen, JK, & Rashotte, CA (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31(2), 81–83.
  • Jiménez, J. E., Rodríguez, C., & Ramírez, G. (2009). Spanish developmental dyslexia: Prevalence, cognitive profile, and home literacy experiences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 167–185.
  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). The Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. K-BIT. TEA.
  • Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R., & Pfeiffer, S. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 453–464.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
  • Maldonado, A., Sebastián, E., & Soto, P. (1992). Retraso en Lectura: Evaluación y Tratamiento Educativo. UAM.
  • Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Dean, P. (2001). Dislexia, development and the cerebellum. Trends in Neurosciences, 24(9), 508–515.
  • Norton, E., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 427–452.
  • Novita, S. (2016). Secondary symptoms of Dyslexia: A comparison of self-esteem and anxiety profiles of children with and without dyslexia. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(2), 279–288.
  • Peláez, I. M. (2016). Modelos de regresión: lineal simple y regresión logística. Revista Seden, 14, 195–214.
  • Pino, M., & Bravo, L. (2005). La memoria visual como predictor del aprendizaje de la lectura. Psykhe, 14(1), 47–53.
  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial-verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662.
  • Suárez-Coalla, P., & Cuetos, F. (2012). Reading strategies in Spanish developmental dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 62(2), 71–81.
  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(5), 276–286.
  • Wechsler, D. (2005). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children (4th ed.). Pearson Assessment.
  • Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57(11), 1336–1346.
  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (2000). Naming-speed processes and developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the special issue on the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 322–324.
  • Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). RAN/RAS: Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Pro–ed.
La source de données: Dialnet