Spanish version of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS)results from two samples of female university students

  1. Alba Moya-Garófano
  2. Jesús L. Megías
  3. Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
  4. Miguel Moya
Journal:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748 1579-3680

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 32

Issue: 2

Pages: 377-394

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2017.1292700 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Self-objectification happens when people internalize a view of themselves as an object or collection of body parts. Two studies were conducted to validate the Spanish version of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS). This scale assesses self-objectification through three components: body surveillance, body shame and appearance control beliefs in women. In Study 1 and Study 2, 218 and 201 female undergraduate students, respectively, responded to the Spanish version of this scale and other related measures. In Study 2, they also reported on their emotions after being exposed to an objectifying scenario. The three subscales of the Spanish version of the OBCS showed acceptable indices of internal consistency (ranging between α = .68 to .84), and the confirmatory factor analysis showed a three-factor solution to be the most appropriate. Adequate convergent validity was found with respect to the Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) and other variables such as self-esteem, other-directedness, hostile sexism and enjoyment of sexualization. These findings suggest that the Spanish version of the OBCS is a satisfactory measure of college women’s self-objectification.

Funding information

Bibliographic References

  • Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. doi:10.1177/0146167207313727 , , ,
  • Calogero, R. M. (2011). Operationalizing self-objectification: Assessment and related methodological issues. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-Objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 23–49). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-002 ,
  • Calogero, R. M., Tantleff Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-Objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-002 ,
  • Calogero, R. M., & Jost, J. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 211–228. doi:10.1037/a0021864 , ,
  • Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., Park, L. E., & Rahemtulla, Z. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5 , ,
  • Carretero-Dios, H., Eid, M., & Ruch, W. (2011). Analyzing multitrait-mulitmethod data with multilevel confirmatory factor analysis: An application to the validation of the state-trait cheerfulness inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.12.007 , ,
  • Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 449–460. ,
  • Echebarría, A., & Páez, D. (1989). Emociones: Perspectivas psicosociales. [Emotions: Psychosocial perspectives]. Madrid: Fundamentos.
  • Echeburúa, F. (1995). Evaluación y tratamiento de la fobia social. [Evaluation and treatment of social phobia]. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
  • Erchull, N. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the sex is power scale. Gender Issues, 30, 39–53. doi:10.1007/s12147-013-9114-6 ,
  • Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. [Ambivalent sexism: Measurement and correlates]. Revista de Psicología Social, 13, 159–169. doi:10.1174/021347498760350641,
  • Fredrickson, B., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x , ,
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 , ,
  • Gruenfeld, D., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J., & Galinsky, A. (2008). Power and objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111 , , ,
  • Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women’s experiences with sexual and self-objectification. Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745–776. doi:10.1177/0011000007301669 , ,
  • Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765. doi:10.1177/0013164494054003022 , ,
  • Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x , ,
  • Liss, M., Erchull, M., & Ramsey, L. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55–68. doi:10.1177/0146167210386119 , , ,
  • Lozano, L. M., Valor-Segura, I., Sáez, G., & Expósito, F. (2015). The Spanish adaptation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale (ISOS). Psicothema, 27, 134–140. doi:10.7334/psicothema2014.124 , , ,
  • Luengas, H. T., & Velandia-Morales, A. (2012). Nivel de sexismo en consumidores y su valoración sexista de la publicidad. Suma Psicológica, 19, 75–88.
  • McKinley, N., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x , ,
  • Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 147–172. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2001.2343 , ,
  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2004–2008). Mplus. User manual. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x , ,
  • Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x , ,
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ,
  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526. doi:10.1037/h0037039 , ,
  • Visser, B. A., Sultani, F., Choma, B. L., & Pozzebon, J. A. (2014). Enjoyment of sexualization: Is it different for men? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 495–504. doi:10.1111/jasp.12241 , ,
  • Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis (Version 2.5) [Computer software]. State College, PA: Ed & Pych Associates.