Productivity and impact of Spanish researchersreference thresholds within scientific areas

Bibliographic References

• Abramo, G., and D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics, vol. 86 (2), 347-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0297-2
• Alonso-Arroyo, A.; Pulgarín, A., and Gil-Leiva, I. (2006). Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia 1973-2001. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 29 (3), 345-363.
• Bordons, M.; Fernández, M., and Gómez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance. Scientometrics, vol. 53 (2), 195-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014800407876
• Buela-Casal, G.; Bermúdez, M. P.; Sierra, J. C.; Quevedo-Blasco, R., and Castro, Á. (2010). Ranking de 2009 en investigación de las universidades públicas españolas. Psicothema, vol. 22, 171-179. PMid:20423618
• Buela-Casal, G.; Medina, A.; Viedma, M.; Godoy, V.; Lozano, S., and Torres, G. (2004). Factor de impacto de tres revistas españolas de Psicología. Psicothema, vol. 16 (4), 680-688.
• Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications – the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, vol. 32 (1), 143-155. CNEAI. (2005). Memoria sobre la situación del profesorado numerario con respecto a los sexenios de investigación. Año 2005.
• Camí, J. (1997). Impactolatría: diagnóstico y tratamiento. Medicina Clínica, vol. 109 (13), 515-524.
• Carpenter, M. P.; Gibb, F.; Harris, M.; Irvine, J.; Martin, B. R., and Narin, F. (1988). Bibliometric profi les for British academic institutions: An experiment to develop research output indicators. Scientometrics, vol. 14 (3-4), 213-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02020076
• Costas, R. (2008). Análisis bibliométrico de la actividad científi ca de los investigadores del CSIC en tres áreas: Biología y Biomedicina, Ciencia de Materiales y Recursos Naturales. Una aproximación metodológica a nivel micro (Web of Science, 1994-2004). [Tesis doctoral] Universidad Carlos III.
• Costas, R., and Bordons, M. (2005). Bibliometric indicators at the micro-level: some results in the area of natural resources at the Spanish CSIC. Research Evaluation, vol. 14 (2), 110-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776238
• Costas, R.; van Leeuwen, T. N., and Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classifi catory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: the effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61 (8), 1564–1581.
• Cronin, B., and Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 57 (9), 1275-1278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20354
• Cruz-Castro, L., and Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2007). Research Evaluation in transition: individual versus organisational assessment in Spain. En: Whitley, R., Gläser, J. (editors). The Sociology of Sciences Yearbook: The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of the Research Evaluation Systems. Springer, Dordrecht.
• Delgado-López-Cózar, E.; Jiménez-Contreras, E., and Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2009). España y los 25 grandes de la ciencia mundial en cifras (1992-2008). El Profesional de la Información, vol. 18 (1), 81-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2009.ene.11
• Garfield, E. (2003). The meaning of the Impact Factor. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, vol. 3 (2), 363-369.
• González-De-Dios, J.; Valderrama-Zurian, J. C.; Gonzalez-Alcaide, G.; Sempere, A. P.; Bolanos-Pizarro, M., and Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2009). Approximation to the impact of biomedical journals in neurological sciences: study of bibliometric indicators in the Journal Citation Reports-Science Citation Index 2006. Revista de Neurología, vol. 48 (3), 117-128. PMid:19206058
• Gordillo, V.; González, J., and Muñiz, J. (2004). La evaluación de Proyectos de Investigación por la Agencia Nacional de Evaluación y Prospectiva. Psicothema, vol. 16 (3), 343-349.
• Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E., and Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2006). Producción española en biblioteconomía y documentación con visibilidad internacional a través del Web of Science (1995-2004). El Profesional de la Información, vol. 15 (5), 373-383.
• Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Moya-Anegón, F. D., and Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2003). The evolution of research activity in Spain: The impact of the National Commission for the Evaluation of Research Activity (CNEAI). Research Policy, vol. 32 (1), 123-142.
• Lawrence, P. (2002). Rank injustice. Nature, vol. 415 (6874), 835-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/415835a PMid:11859339
• Lewison, G.; Cottrell, R., and Dixon, D. (1999). Bibliometric indicators to assist the peer review process in grant decisions. Research Evaluation, vol. 8 (1), 47-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154499781777621
• Macías-Chapula, C.; Rodea-Castro, I.; Gutierrez-Carrasco, A., and Mendoza-Guerrero, J. (2004). Producción científica institucional y posicionamiento nacional: el caso del Hospital General de México. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 27 (4), 482-497.
• Meho, L. I., and Spurgin, K. M. (2005). Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 56 (12), 1314-1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20227
• Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht; Springer. Moed, H.; Burger, W.; Frankfort, J., and van Raan, A. F. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, vol. 14 (3), 131-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
• Moya Anegón, F.; Chinchilla Rodríguez, Z.; Corera Álvarez, E.; Vargas Quesada, B.; Muñoz Fernández, F., and Herrero Solana, V. (2005). Análisis de dominio institucional: la producción científica de la Universidad de Granada (SCI 1991-99). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 28 (2), 170-195.
• Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 58 (2), 297-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20460
• Ruiz-Pérez, R.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E., and Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2002). Spanish name variations in national and international biomedical databases: implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies. Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 90 (4), 411-430. PMid:12398248 PMCid:128958
• Ruiz-Pérez, R.; Jiménez-Contreras, E., and Delgado-López-Cózar, E. (2008). Complementos bibliométricos de Thomson Scientific en la Web: buenos, bonitos y gratuitos. El Profesional de la Información, vol. 17 (5), 559-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2008.sep.11
• Sanz-Menéndez, L. (1997). Estado, ciencia y tecnología en España: 1939-1997. Madrid; Alianza.
• Schubert, A., and Braun, T. (1996). Cross-fi eld normalization of scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, vol. 36 (3), 311-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129597
• Seglen, P. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, vol. 314 (7079), 498-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
• Thijs, B., and Glänzel, W. (2009). A structural analysis of benchmarks on different bibliometrical indicators for European research institutes based on their research profile. Scientometrics, vol. 79 (2), 377-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0425-z
• Thomson Reuters. (2008). Thomson Scientific Begins Expansion of Web of Science. http://science.thomsonreuters.com/press/2008/8445762/ [consulta: 02/07/2010].
• Torres-Salinas, D.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E., and Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2009a). Análisis de la producción de la Universidad de Navarra en revistas de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades empleando rankings de revistas españolas y la Web of Science. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 32 (1), 22-39.
• Torres-Salinas, D.; Delgado-López-Cózar, E.,and Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2009b). Rankings for departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus. Scientometrics, vol. 80 (3), 761-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2113-9
• Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics, vol. 62 (1), 117-131. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefi ts from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, vol. 66 (1), 133-154.
• van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verifi cation in research performance assessment. Research Evaluation, vol. 16 (2), 93- 105. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/095820207X227529
• van Leeuwen, T., and Moed, H. (2005). Characteristics of Journal Impact Factors: The effect of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, vol. 63 (2), 357-371. van Raan, A. F. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, vol. 36 (3), 397-420.
• van Raan, A. F. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, vol. 62 (1), 133-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
• van Raan A. F., and van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Assessment of the scientifi c basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research. Research Policy, vol. 31 (4), 611-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00129-9