Objetivos y estrategias de los políticos españoles en Twitter

  1. Segado-Boj, Francisco
  2. Díaz del Campo Lozano, Jesús
  3. Lloves Sobrado, Beatriz
Revista:
Index.comunicación: Revista científica en el ámbito de la Comunicación Aplicada

ISSN: 2174-1859

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Número anual ordinario

Volumen: 6

Número: 1

Páginas: 77-98

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Index.comunicación: Revista científica en el ámbito de la Comunicación Aplicada

Resumen

This paper analyses the uses of Twitter by the most important Spanish politicians outside elections political campaigns. The overall objective is to analyze how Spanish politicians use Twitter and to find out if political scandals influence those uses. A content analysis is applied to 586 messages posted by ten political leaders in two different time lapses, one of them characterized by the attention paid by media to a political scandal. Criteria regarding type of messages and discourse directionality are followed. Results indicate that most messages are basically unidirectional, with few addressing other users. Similarly most of the messages are categorized as ‘self-promotion’ or ‘information sharing’. It is concluded that their communicative practices on this platform are driven by propagandist objectives, leaving aside the search of a higher transparence or a deeper dialogue with the citizens

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AMPOFO, L.; ANSTEAD, N.; y O'LOUGHLIN, B. (2011): ‘Trust, confidence, and credibility: Citizen responses on Twitter to opinion polls during the 2010 UK general election’, en Information, Communication & Society, nº 14 (6), pp. 850-871.
  • BEKAFIGO, M. A. y MCBRIDE, A. (2013): ‘Who tweets about politics? Political participation of Twitter users during the 2011 gubernatorial elections’, en Social Science Computer Review, nº 31 (5), pp. 1-19.
  • BENNETT, W. L. (2012): ‘The personalization of politics political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation’, en The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, nº 644 (1), pp. 20-39.
  • BERLANGA, I.; GARCÍA, F. y VICTORIA, J. S. (2013): ‘Ethos, pathos y logos en Facebook. El usuario de redes: nuevo ‘rétor’ del siglo XXI’, en Comunicar, nº 41, pp. 127-135.
  • BOYD, D.; GOLDER, S. y LOTAN, G. (2010): ‘Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter’, en Paper presented at the System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on. Recuperado el 29 de enero de 2016 desde: http://www.danah.org/papers/TweetTweet-Retweet.pdf
  • CHEN, G. M. (2011): ‘Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others’, en Computers in Human Behavior, nº 27 (2), pp. 755-762.
  • DANG-XUAN, L.; STIEGLITZ, S.; WLADARSCH, J.; y NEUBERGER, C. (2013): ‘An investigation of influential and the role of sentiment in political communication on Twitter during election periods’, en Information, Communication & Society, nº 16 (5), pp. 795-825.
  • DE ZÚÑIGA, H.; JUNG, N. y VALENZUELA, S. (2012): ‘Social media use for news and individual's social capital, civic engagement and political participation’, en Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, nº 17, pp. 319-336.
  • Elmer, G. (2013): ‘Live research: Twittering an election debate’, en New Media & Society, nº 15 (1), pp. 18-30.
  • ELTANTAWY, N. y WIEST, J. B. (2011): ‘The Arab Spring| Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory’, en International Journal of Communication, nº 5, pp. 18.
  • Enli, G. S. y Skogerbo, E. (2013): ‘Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication’, en Information, Communication & Society, nº 16 (5), pp. 757-774.
  • FERNÁNDEZ, C. B. (2012): ‘Twitter y la ciberpolítica’, en Disertaciones. Anuario Electrónico de Estudios en Comunicación, nº 5 (1), pp. 9-24.
  • FRAME, A.; y BRACHOTTE, G. (2015): ‘Le tweet stratégique: Use of Twitter as a PR tool by French politicians’, en Public Relations Review, nº 41 (2), pp. 278-287.
  • GOLBECK, J.; GRIMES, J. M.; y ROGERS, A. (2010): ‘Twitter use by the US Congress’, en Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, nº 61 (8), pp. 1612-1621.
  • GÓMEZCOMPANY, A. (2013): ‘Diálogo digital y consenso en la estrategia comunicativa de partidos políticos fuera de campaña’, en: M. VICENTE MARIÑO; T. GONZÁLEZ HORTIGÜELA y M. PACHECO RUEDA (coords.): Investigar la Comunicación hoy. Revisión de políticas científicas y aportaciones metodológicas: Simposio Internacional sobre Política Científica en Comunicación, pp. 321-226. Segovia: Universidad de Valladolid.
  • GUEORGUIEVA, V. (2008): ‘Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond’, en Social Science Computer Review, nº 26 (3), pp. 288-300.
  • HANSON, G.; HARIDAKIS, P. M.; CUNNINGHAM, A. W.: SHARMA, R., y PONDER, J. D. (2010): ‘The 2008 Presidential Campaign: Political cynicism in the Age of Facebook, Myspace and Youtube’, en Mass Communication and Society, nº 13 (5), pp. 584-607.
  • HARRIS, L. y RAE, A. (2011): ‘Building a personal brand through social networking’, en Journal of Business Strategy, nº 32 (5), pp. 14-21.
  • HEATHERLY, K. A.; LU, Y. y LEE, J. K. (2016): ‘Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites’, en New Media & Society, doi: 1461444816634677.
  • HEO, Y. C.; PARK, J. Y.; KIM, J. Y.; y PARK, H. W. (2016): ‘The emerging viewertariat in South Korea: The Seoul mayoral TV debate on Twitter, Facebook, and blogs’, en Telematics and Informatics, nº 33 (2), pp, 570-583.
  • Honeycutt, C.; y HERRING, S. C. (2009): ‘Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter’, en Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), pp. 1-10. Los Alamitos (Ca): IEEE. Recuperado el 28 de enero de 2016 desde: http://www.ledbetter.de/pdf/ beyondmicroblogging.PDF
  • HONG, S.; y NADLER, D. (2012): ‘Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience’, en Government Information Quarterly, nº 29 (4), pp. 455-461.
  • HUBERMAN, B. A.; ROMERO, D. M.; y Wu, F. (2009): ‘ Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope’, en First Monday, nº 14 (1), pp. 8.
  • Karlsen, R. (2015): ‘Followers are opinion leaders: The role of people in the flow of political communication on and beyond social networking sites’, en European Journal of Communication, nº 30, pp. 301-318.
  • LARSSON, A. O.; y MOE, H. (2012): ‘Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign’, en New Media & Society, nº 14 (5), pp. 729-747.
  • LEE, E. J.; y SHIN, S. Y. (2012): ‘Effects of Politician’s Twitter Communication. When the Medium is the Message: How transportability moderates the effects of Politicians’ Twitter Communication’, en Communication Research, nº 41 (8), pp. 1088-1110.
  • LEVINSON, P. (2011): ‘The long story about the short medium’, en Journal of Communication Research, nº 48, pp. 7-28.
  • MATHIEU, D. (2015): ‘The Continued Relevance of Reception Analysis in the Age of Social Media’, en Trípodos, nº 36, pp. 13-34.
  • MICKES, L.; DARBY, R. S.; HWE, V.; BAJIC, D.; WARKER, J. A.; HARRIS, C. R.; y CHRISTENFELD, N. J. (2013): ‘Major memory for microblogs’, en Memory & Cognition, nº 41 (4), pp. 481-489.
  • MOYA, M.; y HERRERA, S. (2015): ‘Cómo puede contribuir Twitter a una comunicación política más avanzada’, en Árbor, nº 191, p. 774. Consultado desde: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.774n4012
  • NAAMAN, M.; BOASE, J.; y LAI, C. H. (2010): ‘Is it Really About Me? Message Content in Social Awareness Streams’. Ponencia en ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Savannah. Recuperado el 26 de enero de 2016 desde: http://infolab.stanford.edu/~mor/research/naamanCSCW10.pdf
  • NYHAN, B. (2015): ‘Scandal potential: How political context and news congestion affect the president’s vulnerability to media scandal’, en British Journal of Political Science, nº 45 (02), pp. 435-466.
  • PARK, C. S. (2013): ‘Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement’, en Computers in Human Behavior, nº 29 (4), pp. 1641-1648.
  • PONDER, J. D.; y HARIDAKIS, P. (2015): ‘Selectively social politics: The differing roles of media Use on political discussion, en Mass Communication & Society, nº 18 (3), pp. 281-302.
  • SAID HUNG, E.; y ARCILA CALDERÓN, C. (2011): ‘Líderes de opinión en Colombia, Venezuela e Irán. El caso de los 20 usuarios más vistos en Twitter’, en Communication& Society, nº 24 (1), pp. 75-100.
  • SAMPEDRO, V.; y SÁNCHEZ DUARTE, J. M. (2011): ‘La Red era la plaza’. Recuperado el 26 de enero de 2016 desde: http://www.ciberdemocracia.net/articulos/RedPlaza.pdf
  • SÁNCHEZ DUARTE, J. M.; y RODRÍGUEZ ESPERANZA, S. (2013): ‘La extremaderecha en Facebook. España 2000 y Democracia Nacional durante la campaña electoral de 2011’, en Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, nº 4 (1). Recuperado el 28 de enero de 2016 desde: http://www.mediterraneacomunicacion.org/index.php/Mediterranea/article/view/49
  • SOVSGAARD, M.; y VAN DALEN, A. (2013): ‘Dodging the gatekeepers? Social media in the campaign mix during the 2011 Danish elections’, en Information, Communication & Society, nº 16 (5), pp. 737-756.
  • SLOAM, J. (2014): ‘‘The outraged young’: young Europeans, civic engagement and the new media in a time of crisis’, en Information, Communication & Society, nº 7 (2), pp. 217-231.
  • STANDAGE, T. (2013): Writing on the wall. Social Media: The first 2,000 years. New York: Bloomsbury.
  • TOWNER, T. L. (2013): ‘All political participation is socially networked?: New media and the 2012 election’, en Social Science Computer Review, nº 31 (5), pp. 527-541.
  • TUMASJAN, A.; SPRENGER, T. O.; SANDNER, P. G.; y WELPE, I. M. (2010): ‘Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment’, en ICWSM, nº 10, pp.178-185.
  • VACCARI, C. (2008): ‘Research note: Italian parties' Websites in the 2006 elections’, en European Journal of Communication, nº 23 (1), pp. 69-77.
  • VALENZUELA, S.; ARRIAGADA, A.; y SCHERMAN, A. (2012): ‘The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile’, en Journal of Communication, nº 62 (2), pp. 299-314.
  • Van DJICK, J. (2012): ‘Facebook as a tool for producing sociality and connectivity’, en Television and New Media, nº 13 (2), pp. 160-176.
  • VÁZQUEZ SANDE, P. (2013): ‘Alcaldes españoles en Twitter: ¿diálogo o monólogo?’, en Fonseca, Journal of Communication, nº 7, pp. 44-71.
  • VERGEER, M. (2015): ‘Twitter and Political Campaigning’, en Sociology Compass, nº 9 (9), pp. 745-760.
  • VERGEERM.; y HERMANS, L. (2013): ‘Campaigning on Twitter: microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands’, en Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, nº 18 (4), pp. 399 – 419.
  • VELETSIANOS, G. (2012): ‘Higher education scholar’s participation and practices on Twitter’, en Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, nº 28 (4), pp. 336-349.
  • WARREN, A. M.; SULAIMAN, A. y JAAFAR, N. I. (2014): ‘Facebook: The enabler of online civic engagement for activists’, en Computers in Human Behavior, nº 32, pp. 284-289.
  • ZAMORA, R. y ZURUTUZA, C. (2013): ‘Campaigning on Twitter: “Towards the Personal Style” Campaign to Activate the Political Engagement During the 2011 Spanish General Elections’, en Comunicación y Sociedad, nº 27 (1), pp. 83-106.
  • ZHANG, W.; SELTZER, T.; y BICHARD, S. L. (2013): ‘Two Sides of the Coin: Assessing the Influence of Social Network Site Use During the 2012 US Presidential Campaign’, en Social Science Computer Review, nº 31 (5), pp. 542-551.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet