Indicaciones éticas en las revistas de educación indexadas en la WoS

  1. Jesús Díaz Campo 1
  2. Francisco Segado Boj 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 25

Número: 5

Páginas: 738-746

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2016.SEP.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Se investiga la presencia de indicaciones éticas en las directrices para autores y revisores de 214 revistas de la categoría Educación e Investigación en Educación del Journal Citation Reports de 2014. Se ha empleado un análisis de contenido y temático para examinar qué principios aparecen recogidos y cómo se abordan. Un 11,2% de revistas no incluye ningún tipo de directriz y existe una presencia desigual de los diferentes principios éticos en el resto. Los más abundantes son los criterios para establecer el plagio (63,01%) y la redundancia o duplicación de publicaciones (67,12%). Las responsabilidades éticas de los revisores (7,76%) y las sanciones (3,20%) por conducta poco ética tienen una presencia mínima.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Herz, Waleed; Haider, Hani; Al-Bahhar, Mahmoud; Sadeq, Adman (2014). “Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?”. Journal of medical ethics, v. 40, n. 5, pp. 246-248. https://goo.gl/2DODq7 https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101311
  • Anderson, Melissa S.; Steneck, Nicholas H. (2011). “The problem of plagiarism”. Urologic oncology: Seminars and original investigations, v. 29, n. 1, pp. 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.013
  • Benos, Dale J.; Fabres, Jorge; Farmer, John; Gutierrez, Jessica P.; Hennessy, Kristin; Kosek, Vaid; Hyoung-Lee, Joo; Olteanu, Dragos; Russell, Tara; Shaikh, Faheem; Wang, Kai (2005). “Ethics and scientific publication”. Advances in physiology education, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00056.2004
  • Bosch, Xavier (2014). “Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct”. Journal of medical ethics, v. 40, n. 9, pp. 644-646. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101822
  • Bosch, Xavier; Hernández, Cristina; Pericas, Juan M.; Doti, Pamela; MaruÅ¡ić, Ana (2012). “Misconduct policies in highimpact biomedical journals”. PLoS One, v. 7, n. 12; e51928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051928
  • Cech, Thomas R.; Leonard, Joan S. (2001). “Conflicts of interest. Moving beyond disclosure. Science, v. 291, n. 5506, p. 989. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5506.989
  • Curzer, Howard J.; Santillanes, Gary (2012). “Managing conflict of interest in research: Some suggestions for investigators”. Accountability in research, v. 19, n. 3, pp. 143-155. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08989621.2 012.678685?journalCode=gacr20
  • Elliott, Kevin C. (2008). “Scientific judgment and the limits of conflict-of-interest policies”. Accountability in research, v. 15, n. 1, pp. 1-29. https://goo.gl/BRZhtV https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620701783725
  • Fanelli, Danielle (2009). “How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data”. PLoS One, v. 4, n. 5, e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
  • Fonseca-Mora, María-Carmen; Tur-Viñes, Victoria; Gutiérrez-San Miguel, Begoña (2014). “Ética y revistas científicas españolas de comunicación, educación y psicología: la percepción editora”. Revista española de documentación científica, v. 37, n. 4, e065. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1151
  • Friedman, Lee S.; Richter, Elihu D. (2004). “Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results”. Journal of general internal medicine, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 51-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1494677
  • Garner, Harold R. (2011). “Combating unethical publications with plagiarism detection services”. Urologic oncology: Seminars and original investigations, v. 29, n. 1, pp. 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.016
  • Girvan, Carina; Savage, Timothy (2012). “Ethical considerations for educational research in a virtual world”. Interactive learning environments, v. 20, n. 3, pp. 239-251. https://goo.gl/WcU2Rn https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641678
  • Greenland, Philip; Fontanarosa, Phil B. (2012). “Ending honorary authorship”. Science, v. 337, n. 6098, pp. 1019-1019. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224988
  • Grieneisen, Michael L.; Zhang, Minghua (2012). “A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature”. PLoS One, v. 7, n. 10, e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118
  • Jefferson, Tom (1998). “Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific misconduct or necessity?”. Science and engineering ethics, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 135-140. https://goo.gl/QXVNBU https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-998-0043-9
  • Lefebvre, Maurica; Singh, Jang B. (1992). “The content and focus of Canadian corporate codes of ethics”. Journal of business ethics, v. 11, n .10, pp. 799-808. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072338
  • Martin, Ben R. (2013). “Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment”. Research policy, v. 42, n. 5, pp. 10051014. https://goo.gl/QXZJdn https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.011
  • MaruÅ¡ić, Ana; BoÅ¡njak, Lana; Jerončić, Ana (2011). “A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines”. PLoS One, v. 6, n. 9, e23477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477
  • Masic, Izet (2014). “Plagiarism in scientific research and publications and how to prevent it”. Materia socio-médica, v. 26, n. 2, p. 141. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4035147/ https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.141-146
  • McCraw, Harrison; Moffeit, Kathy S.; O’Malley Jr, John R. (2009). “An analysis of the ethical codes of corporations and business schools”. Journal of business ethics, v. 87, n. 1, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9865-2
  • Moffatt, Barton (2011). “Responsible authorship: why researchers must forgo honorary authorship”. Accountability in research, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 76-90. https://goo.gl/Iq07tC https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557297
  • Mojon-Azzi, Stefania M.; Mojon, Daniel S. (2004). “Scientific misconduct: From salami slicing to data fabrication”. Ophthalmologica, v. 218, n. 1, pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074559
  • Moon, Tonya R. (2011). “A primer on research ethics in the field of gifted education”. Gifted child quarterly, v. 55, n. 3, pp. 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986211412163
  • Ngai, Stephanie; Gold, Jennifer L.; Gill, Sudeep S.; Rochon, Paula A. (2005). “Haunted manuscripts: Ghost authorship in the medical literature”. Accountability in research, v. 12, n. 2, pp. 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620590957175
  • Nutbrown, Cathy (2011). “Naked by the pool? Blurring the image? Ethical issues in the portrayal of young children in arts-based educational research”. Qualitative inquiry, v. 17, n. 1, pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410389437
  • Parsell, Mitch; Ambler, Trudy; Jacenyik-Trawoger, Christa (2014). “Ethics in higher education research”. Studies in higher education, v. 39, n. 1, pp. 166-179. https://goo.gl/1NFMhC https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.647766
  • Pendlebury, Shirley; Enslin, Penny (2001). “Representation, identification and trust: Towards an ethics of educational research”. Journal of philosophy of education, v. 35, n. 3, pp. 361-370. https://goo.gl/Gy8unn https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00232
  • Pillay, Jace (2014). “Ethical considerations in educational research involving children: Implications for educational researchers in South Africa”. South African journal of childhood education, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 194-212 http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/sajce/v4n2/12.pdf
  • Resnik, David B.; Patrone, Daniel; Peddada, Shyamal (2010). “Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor”. Accountability in research, v. 17, n. 2, pp. 79-84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065865 https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621003641181
  • Robinson, Susan R. (2014). “Self-plagiarism and unfortunate publication: an essay on academic values”. Studies in higher education, v. 39, n. 2, pp. 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.655721
  • Roig, Miguel (2008). “The debate on self-plagiarism: Inquisitional science or high standards of scholarship?”. Journal of evidence-based psychotherapies, v. 8, p. 2, p. 245.
  • Russell, William-Moy-Stratton; Burch, Rex-Leonard (1959). The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen: Londres. ISBN: 978 0900767784
  • Strech, Daniel; Metz, Courtney; Knüppel, Hannes (2014). “Do editorial policies support ethical research? A thematic text analysis of author instructions in psychiatry journals”. PLoS One, v. 9, n. 6, e97492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097492
  • Thompson, Dennis F. (1993). “Understanding financial conflicts of interest”. New England journal of medicine, v. 329, p. 573-576. http://interessenkonflikte.de/x1993Thompson.pdf https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199308193290812
  • Tilley, Susan; Gormley, Louise (2007). “Canadian university ethics review. Cultural complications translating principles into practice”. Qualitative inquiry, v. 13, n. 3, pp. 368-387. http://www.brown.uk.com/teaching/HEST5001/tilley.pdf https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406297654
  • Tur-Viñes, Victoria; Fonseca-Mora, María-Carmen; Gutiérrez-San-Miguel, Begoña (2012). “Ética de la publicación científica: iniciativas y recomendaciones”. El profesional de la información, v. 21, n. 5, pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.sep.07
  • Wager, Elizabeth; Barbour, Virginia; Yentis, Steven; Kleinert, Sabine (2009a). “Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)”. Maturitas, v. 64, n. 4, pp. 201-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.09.018
  • Wager, Elizabeth; Fiack, Suzan; Graf, Chris; Robinson, Andrew; Rowlands, Ian (2009b). “Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey”. Journal of medical ethics, v. 35, n. 6, pp. 348-353. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.028324
  • Wiley, Carolyn (2000). “Ethical standards for human resource management professionals: A comparative analysis of five major codes”. Journal of business ethics, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006230214847
  • Wislar, Joseph S.; Flanagin, Annette; Fontanarosa, Phil B.; DeAngelis, Catherine D. (2011). “Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey”. Bmj, v. 343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128
  • Wu, Yang; Zou, Qiang (2015). “The ethical issues in instructions for authors of Chinese biomedical journals”. Learned publishing, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 216-222. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150307
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet