Percepciones y expectativas en el alumnado universitario a partir de la adaptación a la enseñanza no presencial motivada por la pandemia de COVID-19

  1. Gil Villa, Fernando 1
  2. Urchaga Litago, José David 2
  3. Sánchez Fernández, Adrián 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02jj93564

Revista:
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social

ISSN: 1138-5820

Año de publicación: 2020

Número: 78

Páginas: 99-119

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2020-1470 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Latina de Comunicación Social

Resumen

Introduction: Confinement has fostered the debate on digitization and virtual teaching. The objective is to expose the disadvantages of the telematic education system adopted during the quarantine on subjects like equal opportunities, well-being and satisfaction, and teaching quality; focusing on the university education level and taking into account the management of communications with the students. Methodology: Two surveys, both distributed by online means, were carried out on university students, one at the beginning of the confinement (n: 1612), and another in the examination period (n: 872). Results: 90% of students prefer face-to-face teaching and 80% consider that their university has not adapted adequately. Most believe that they will learn less, that their academic record will be affected, and that they will have more difficulties while finding a job. More than a half of the students have suffered close experiences related to coronavirus and they feel a lack of understanding on the university side.  Conclusions: Universities have shown a poor institutional communication performance during the pandemic, both in communication with students and in listening to them.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alvesson M, Gabriel, Y. y Paulsen R. (2017). Return to meaning. A social science with something to say. Oxford University Press.
  • Aznar, I., Hinojo, F. J. y Cáceres, M. P. (2009). Percepciones del alumnado sobre el blended learning en la universidad. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, 33, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.3916/c33-2009-03-008
  • Cabrera, L. (2020). Efectos del coronavirus en el sistema de enseñanza: aumenta la desigualdad de oportunidades educativas en España. Revista de Sociología de la Educación-RASE, 13(2), 114-139. https://doi.org/10.7203/RASE.13.2.17125
  • Campbell A. M. (2020). An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives. Forensic Science International: Reports, 2, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089
  • Chinchurreta, J. (2020). TIC y desigualdades educativas en los centros educativos de Logroño (La Rioja, España). Ehquidad. International Welfare Policies and Social Work Journal, 14, 211-253. https://doi.org/10.15257/ehquidad.2020.0018
  • Dorantes-Carrión, J. (2016). Redes sociales y el ciberbullying en la Universidad Veracruzana. Revista Ensayos Pedagógicos, 169-188. Recuperado a partir de https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/ensayospedagogicos/article/view/9346
  • Elche, M.; Sánchez-García, S. y Yubero S. (2019). Lectura, ocio y rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios del área socioeducativa. Educación XX1, 2(22), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.21548
  • Escribá, A., Iborra, M. y Safón, V. (2019). Modelos de dirección estratégica en universidades españolas de alto desempeño. Fundación BBVA.
  • Fernández-Enguita, M. (2017). Más escuela y menos aulas. Ediciones Morata.
  • García, M. I. y Taberna, J. (2021). Transición de la docencia presencial a la no presencial en la UPC durante la pandemia del COVID-19. IJERI: International journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 177-187. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5015
  • Gutiérrez, A., Palacios, A. y Torrego, L. (2010). Tribus digitales en las aulas universitarias. Comunicar, 17, 173- 181. https://doi.org/10.3916/C34- 2010-03-17
  • Izak, M., Kostera, M. y Zawadzki, M. (2017). Introduction. The Future of University Education. En M. Izak, M. Kostera, y M. Zawadzki (eds.) The Future of University Education (1-16). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Juarros, V. M., Duart, J. M., Galvis, A. H., y Zawacki, O. (2018). Thematic analysis of the international journal of educational Technology in Higher Education (ETHE) between 2004 and 2017. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0089-y
  • Leslie, E. y Wilson, R. (2020). Sheltering in Place and Domestic Violence: Evidence from Calls for Service during COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, Forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3600646
  • Margaritis, I., Houdart, S., El Ouadrhiri, et al. (2020). How to deal with COVID-19 epidemic-related lockdown physical inactivity and sedentary increase in youth? Adaptation of Anses’ benchmarks. Archives of Public Health, 78(52). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00432-z
  • Martínez Rodríguez, J.A. (2017). Acoso escolar: Bullying y ciberbullying. J. Bosch.
  • Mazza, M., Marano, G., Lai, C., Janiri, L., y Sani, G. (2020). Danger in danger: Interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry research, 289, 113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113046
  • Muñoz-Ruiz, A. y Muñoz-Ruiz, F.J. (2019). Ciberbullying, análisis de niveles de victimización y agresión de estudiantes de 5º y 6º de Primaria. En D. Padilla, J.M. Aguilar y R. López (eds.) Salud y ciclo vital (221-234). Dykinson.
  • Narici, M., De Vito, G., Franchi, M., Paoli, A., Moro, T., Marcolin, G., Grassi, B., Baldassarre, G., Zuccarelli, L., Biolo, G., di Girolamo, F. G., Fiotti, N., Dela, F., Greenhaff, P. y Maganaris, C. (2020). Impact of sedentarism due to the COVID-19 home confinement on neuromuscular, cardiovascular and metabolic health: Physiological and pathophysiological implications and recommendations for physical and nutritional countermeasures. European journal of sport science, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1761076
  • Naujokaitienė, J., Tamoliūnė, G., Volungevičienė, A. y Duart J. M. (2020). Using learning analytics to engage students: Improving teaching practices through informed interactions. NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.561
  • Orgilés, M., Morales, A., Delvecchio, E., Mazzeschi, C. y Espada, J. P. (2020). Immediate psychological effects of the COVID-19 quarantine in youth from Italy and Spain. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5bpfz
  • Pérez Vallejo, A.M. y Pérez Ferrer, F. (2016). Bullying, ciberbullying y acoso con elementos sexuales: desde la prevención a la reparación del daño. Dykinson.
  • Pérez, B. y Vicario-Molina, I. (2016). Ciberbullying en la Educación Primaria: Análisis de la Incidencia de la Victimización y la Búsqueda de Apoyo. En C. Costa (coord.). Psicología y educación: presente y futuro (2420-2428). ACIPE.
  • Readings, B. (1997). The university in ruins. HUP.
  • Redondo, J., Luzardo-Briceño, M., García-Lizarazo, K. y Inglés, C. (2017). Impacto psicológico del ciberbullying en estudiantes universitarios: un estudio exploratorio. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 8(2), 458-478. https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.2061
  • Ruiz-Roso, M.B., de Carvalho, P., Mantilla-Escalante, D.C., Ulloa, N., Brun, P., Acevedo-Correa, D., Arantes, W., Martorell, M., Aires, M.T., de Oliveira, L., Carrasco-Marín, F., Paternina-Sierra, K., Rodriguez-Meza, J.E., Montero, P.M., Bernabè, G., Pauletto, A., Taci, X., Visioli, F. y Dávalos, A. (2020). Covid-19 Confinement and Changes of Adolescent’s Dietary Trends in Italy, Spain, Chile, Colombia and Brazil. Nutrients, 12, 1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061807
  • Vergara, E. P. (2007). La experiencia de e-learning en la Universidad de La Rioja. En: Formación e-learning (pp. 59-68). Gobierno de La Rioja.