Estudio de la Aplicación de Programas de Alto Rendimiento para alumnos con altas Capacidades

  1. Pilar Martin- Lobo 1
  2. Silvia Pradas Montilla 1
  3. Enrique Navarro Asencio 2
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

  2. 2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Revista:
Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

ISSN: 1696-2095

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 16

Número: 45

Páginas: 447-476

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.25115/EJREP.V16I45.2101 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Introduction. This research focus on to provide a project for gifted students with enrichment programs that can be performed at the school level. Method. In order to accomplish this, the programs were designed, teachers were trained at six educational centers, 37 gifted students were selected and attention testing was applied (D2); Creating testing (PIC and CREA) and Cognitive Abilities for Solving Interpersonal Problems (Evhocospi) testing were applied before and after performing the Expanded Curriculum, Creative Literature, Scientific World, Creative Mathematics, Art and Culture and Cooperation programs. Results. The results reflect significant improvements in attention, creativity and interpersonal problem resolution in gifted students that participated in the High Achiever Project programs they also reveal new procedures for applying programs for gifted students in the school context Discussion and Conclusion. The intervention program at the expanded curriculum level can be implemented in order to exercise higher intellectual abilities.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Artola, T., Ancillo, I., Barraca, J., & Mosteiro P. (2004). Prueba de Imaginación Creativa. Tea Ediciones: Madrid.
  • Bermejo, R., Fernández, M.C., Prieto, M.D., Soto, G., & Sáinz, M. (2013). A cognitive- creative profile of emotional talent. New Approaches in Educational Research, 2, 12–16. DOI: 10.7821/naer
  • Borges, A., Hernández-Jorge, C., & Rodríguez-Naveiras, E. (2011). Evidence against inadaptation of people with high intelectual capacity. Psicothema, 23, 362-367.
  • Brickenkamp, R. & Zillmer, E. (2000). Prueba de Atención-D2. Madrid: REA Ediciones.
  • Calero, M.D., García-Martín, M. B., Jiménez, M. I., Kazén, M. & Araque, A. (2007). Self-regulated learning and advantage for high-IQ: Findings from a research study. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 328–343.
  • Csiekszentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2004). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In: Heller, K., Monks, F.J., Sternberg, R. & R.F. Subotnik, R.F. (Eds). International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent, 81-93. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
  • Coleman, L.J. (2003). Gifted-child pedagogy: Meaningful chimera? Roeper Review, 24(4), 163.164.
  • Corbalán, J.F., Martínez, F., Donolo, D., Alonso, C., Tejerían, M., Limiñana, R.M. (2003). Creative Inteligence test – CREA. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
  • Cramond, B. (2011). Giftedness and Creativity. In: Runco, M.A., Pritzer, R., (Eds.). Encyclopedia of creativity. 2 ed. New York: Academic Press; 2011. (pp. 571-574).
  • Dai, Y.D., Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: in search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 151-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020
  • Deci, E. & Ryan, R. M, (2000). What is de self in self-directed learning? Finding from recent motivational research. In: Staka, G. (Ed), Conceptions of self-directed learning: theoritical and conceptual considerations. Munster: Waxmann.
  • Dietrich A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychological Bulletin Review, 11, 1011-26.
  • Dillon, P. (2006). Creativity, integrativism and a pedagogy of connection. International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity,1(2), 69-83.
  • Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., Buchanan, C.M., Flanagan, C., Max Iver, D., Reuman, D. et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: the impacto of stage/environment fit. American Psychologist. 48, 90-101.
  • Feist, G. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In: E.L Grigorenko & R.J. Sternberg (Eds). Creativity: from potential to realization, 57-82. Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Feldman, D.H. (1982). A developmental framework for research with gifted children. In: Feldman, D.H. (Ed). New Directions for Child Development: Developmental Approaches to Giftedness and Creativity, 31-45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ferrándiz, C., Prieto, M.D., Fernández, M.C., Soto, G., Ferrando, M. & Badía, M. (2010). Modelos de identificación de estudiantes con altas capacidades en la Educación Secundria. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 13, 63-74.
  • Gagné, (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory, High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119-147.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiples Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1984). Art, mind, and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Georgsdottir, A. & Lubart, T.I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and creativity: a deveolpmental, differential and experimental approach. Psychologie Francaise, 48(3), 29-40.
  • Gismero, E. (2000). Escala de habilidades sociales. Madrid: TEA.
  • Guildford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. Americn Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
  • Harnett, D.N., Nelson, J.M., Rinn, N. (2004). Gifted or ADHD? The possibilities of misdiagnosis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 73-76.
  • Heilman, K.M., Nadeau, S.E., Bedersdorf, D.O. (2003). Creative innovation: possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase 2003, 9; 369-79.
  • Helme, S. & Clarcke, D. (2001). Identify cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13, 133-153.
  • Hernández, D., & Gutiérrez, M. (2014). The study of high intellectual ability in Spain: Analysis of the current situation. Psicodidáctica, 364-261.
  • Hernández-Torrano, D., Ferrándiz, C., Ferrando, C., Prieto, D., & Fernández, C. (2014). La teoría de las Inteligencias Múltiples en la identificación de estudiantes con altas capacidades. Anales de Psicología, 30, 192-200.
  • Higgins, S.E., Mercier, E.M., Burd, E. & Hatch, A. (2011). Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: a synthetic review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 515-538.
  • Jiménez, F.C. (2000). Diagnóstico y educación de los estudiantes con altas capacidades. Madrid: UNED.
  • Jung, R.E., Segall, J.M., Bockholt, H.J., Flores, R.A., Smith, S.M., Chavez, R.S., et al. (2010). Neuroanatomy of creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 386-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20874
  • Kaufman, A.B., Kornilov, S.A., Bristol, A.S., Tan, M., & Grigirenko, E.L. (2010). The neurobiological foundations of creative cognition. In: Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J. (Eds). The Cambridge Handbook of creativity (pp. 216-232). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kim K.H. (2011). The creative crisis: de decrise in creativethinking scores on The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal. 23, 285-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.627805
  • Lawler (2000). Gifted or ADHD: Misdiagnosis? How can be certain correct diagnosis has been made? Understanding our gifted, 13(1), 16-18.
  • Lautrey, J. (2004). Modes of schooling of gifted children and their effects. Psycholigie Francaise, 49, 337-352.
  • Lee, L.Y., & Li, C.Y. (2008). The poderating effects of teaching mhetod, learning style and cross-cultural differences on the relationship between expatriate training and training effectiveness. The international Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(4), 600-609.
  • Lubart, T.I. (2006). Enfants exceptionnels. Precocité intellectuale, haut potentiel et talent. (Exceptional children: precocity, high potential and talent). Paris: Breal.
  • Lubar, T.I., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychology de la creativité. (Psychology of creativity). Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Martín-Lobo, P. (2003). La lectura. Procesos Neuropsicológicos, studio de casos, dificultades de aprendizaje y programas de intervención. Barcelona: Lebón.
  • Martín-Lobo, P. (2004). Niños inteligentes. Guía para desarrollar los talentos y altas capacidades. Madrid: Palabra.
  • Mckanzie, W. (1999). Multiple Intelligences Survey. Copyright 1999-2017 Walter McKenzie.
  • Monjas, M.I., & González, B. (2000). Habilidades sociales en el currículo. Madrid: CEPE.
  • Montero, J., Navarro, J.I. y Ramiro, P. (2005). Cognitive styles of dependency-independency of reflexivity-impulsivity and intelectual giftedness. Faisca, 12, 5–15.
  • Moon, S.M., Zentall, S.S., Grskovic, J.A., Hall, A.M., & Stormont-Spurgin, M., (2001). Emotional and social characteristics of boys with AD/HD and giftedness: A comparative case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 207-247.
  • Moon, S. M. (2002). Risk groups from the socio-emotional perspective in the gifted population. In: Peñas-Hernandez. Social-emotional characteristics of of gifted population. Madrid: CIDE.
  • Navarro, J.I., Ramiro, P., López, J. M., Aguilar, M., Acosta, M. & Montero, J. (2006). Mental attention in gifted and non-gifted children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 401–411.
  • Newton, L. & Newton, D. (2010). Creative thinking and teaching for creativity in elementary school science. Gifted and Talented International, 25(2), 111-124.
  • https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673575
  • Olfson, M., Marcus, S.C., Weissman, M.M., & Jensen, P.S. (2002). National trends in the use of psychotropic medications by children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41,514-521.
  • Patrick, H., Ryan, A. & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescent´s perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83-98.
  • Peralta, F. & Repáraz, C. (2002). WISC-R as a diagnosis instrument for high capacity students: a descriptive study. Bordón, 54, 419–429.
  • Prieto, M.D., Parra, J., Ferrardo, M., Bermejo, M.R., Ferrándiz, C. & Sánchez, C. (2006). Creative Abilities in Early Chilhood. Journal Early Chilhood Research, 4, 277-290.
  • Ramírez, G., Álvarez, J., Jiménez, J.E. & Artiles, C. (2004). Early identification of students with high intelectual capcity in the Canary Ilands región. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 24, 469–484.
  • Ramiro, P., Navarro, J.I., Menacho, I. & Aguilar, M. (2010). Cognitive style, reflexibity and impulsivity in students with high intelectual level. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 42, 193–202.
  • Renzulli, J.S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: a four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 150-159.
  • DOI: 10.1177/001698621244490.
  • Rogers, K. B. (2002). Re-forming gifted education: Marching the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
  • Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescent´s motivation management during middle school. American Educationarl Research Journal 28, 437-460.
  • Salk, U. (2004). About creativity, giftedness and teaching the creativity gifted in the classroom, Roeper Review, 26(4), 2016-222.
  • Sánchez, C., Prieto, M. D., Parra, J., Ferrando, M., Ferrándiz, C. & Bermejo, R. (2007a). Personality traits in students with high skills. Sobredotaçao, 8, 139–152.
  • Sánchez, C., Prieto, M.D., Parra, J., Ferrando, M., Ferrándiz, C. & Bermejo, R. (2007b). How do teachers and parents perceive socialisation of gifted and talented people. Sobredotaçao, 8, 153–172.
  • Sastre-Riba, S. (2014). Psychoeducational intervention in high intelectual capacity: intelectual functioning and extracurricular enrichnment. Revista de Neurología, 58, 89-98.
  • Sastre-Riba S., & Pascual-Sufrate, M.T. (2013). Alta capacidad intelectual, resolución de problemas y creatividad. Revista de Neurología, 56(1), 67-76.
  • Shi J, Tao T, Chen W, Cheng L, Wang L, Zhang X (2013) Sustained Attention in Intellectually Gifted Children Assessed Using a Continuous Performance Test. PLoS ONE 8(2): e57417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057417
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. y Lubart, T.I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativiy in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325-338.
  • Tourón, J. (2011). The Center for Talented Youth Identification Model: A Review of the Literature. Talent Development and Excellence, 3(2), 187–202.
  • Wang, M. T., Brinkworth, M. E. & Eccles, J. S. (2013). The moderation effect of teacher-student relationship on the association between adolescent self-regulation ability, family conflict, and development problems. Developmental Psychology, 49, 690-705.
  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Davis-Kean, P., & Scheifele, U. (2006). Motivation to succed. In N. Eisenberg (Series Ed.) y W. Damon (Vol. Ed.) (6th ed.). Handbook of child psychology. Vol 3. Social, emotional and personality development (pp 933-1002) New York: Wiley.
  • Zhang, L.F. (2008). Preferences for teaching styles matter in academic achievment. Scientific and practical implications. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 615-625.
  • Ziegler A., Stoeger, H. & Vialle, W. (2012). Giftedness and gifted education: the need for a paradigm change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 194-7.