Información científica en Argentina, España y Méxicofuentes, recursos multimedia y participación de los lectores en los diarios online

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, William C. (1986): “Whose lives count? TV coverage of natural disasters”. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 113-122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01429.x
• Allan, Stuart (2006): Online News: Journalism and the Internet. Maidenhead, Open University Press.
• Allern, Sigurd (2002): “Journalistic and commercial news values: News organizations as patrons of an institution and market actors”. Nordicom Review, 23 (1-2), 137–152.
• Bright, Jonathan (2016): “The Social News Gap: How News Reading and News Sharing Diverge”. Journal of Communication, 66 (3), 343-365, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12232
• Carlson, Matt (2016): “Embedded Links, Embedded Meanings: Social media commentary and news sharing as mundane media criticism”. Journalism Studies, 17 (7), 915-924, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1169210
• Carver, Rebecca B.; Rødland, Einar A.; and Breivik, Jarle (2013): “Quantitative frame analysis of how the gene concept is presented in tabloid and elite newspapers”. Science Communication, 35 (4), 449-475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547012460525
• Castell, Sarah; Charlton, Anne; Clemence, Michael; Pettigrew, Nick; Pope, Sarah; Quigley, Anna; Shah, Jayesh N.; and Silman, Tim (2014): Public Attitudes to Science 2014. London, ESRC http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/pas-2014-main-report.pdf [Consulta: 15 de mayo de 2017]
• Clark, Fiona & Illman, Deborah L. (2006): “A longitudinal study of the New York Times Science Times section”. Science Communication, 27 (4), 496-513, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547006288010
• Deuze, Mark (2005): “What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered”. Journalism, 6 (4), 442–464, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
• Fahy, Declan & Nisbet, Matthew C. (2011): “The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices”. Journalism, 12 (7), 778-793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412697
• García-Perdomo, Víctor; Salaverría, Ramón; Kilgo, Danielle K.; and Harlow, Summer (2017): “To Share or Not to Share: The influence of news values and topics on popular social media content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina”. Journalism Studies, 1-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896
• Granado, Antonio (2011): “Slaves to journals, serfs to the web: The use of internet in newsgathering among European science journalists”. Journalism, 12 (7), 794-813, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884911412702
• Hansen, Anders (2009): “Science, communication and media”, en Holliman, Richard et al. (eds.): Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age (105-127). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Hijmans, Ellen; Pleijter, Alexander; and Wester, Fred (2003): “Covering scientific research in Dutch newspapers”. Science Communication, 25 (2), 153-176, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547003259559
• Hwong, Yi-Ling; Oliver, Carol; Van Kranendonk, Martin; Sammut, Claude; and Seroussi, Yanir (2017): “What makes you tick? The psychology of social media engagement in space science communication”. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 480-492, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.068
• Jarque Muñoz, José Manuel y Almirón Roig, Núria (2008): “Periodismo para Internet o periodismo, y punto”. Palabra Clave, 11 (2), 219-252.
• Jarreau, Paige B. & Porter, Lance (2017): “Science in the Social Media Age: Profiles of Science Blog Readers”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, http://dx.doir.org/1077699016685558
• Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia; Johnson, Benjamin K.; and Westerwick, Axel (2013): “To your health: Self-regulation of health behavior through selective exposure to online health messages”. Journal of Communication, 63 (5), 807–829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12055
• Lemańczyk, Szczepan (2014): “Science and National Pride The Iranian Press Coverage of Nanotechnology, 2004-2009”. Science Communication, 36 (2), 194-218, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547013516873
• Maillé, Marie-Ève; Saint-Charles, Johanne; and Lucotte, Marc (2010): “The gap between scientists and journalists: the case of mercury science in Québec’s press”. Public Understanding of Science, 19 (1), 70-79, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662509102690
• Manca, Stefania & Ranieri, Maria (2017): “Networked Scholarship and Motivations for Social Media use in Scholarly Communication”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18 (2), http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2859/4084 [Consulta: 25 de mayo de 2017]
• Massarani, Luisa; Amorim, Luis; y Montes de Oca, Acianela (2012): “Periodismo científico: reflexiones sobre la práctica en América Latina”. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 120, 73-77.
• Massarani, Luisa & Buys, Bruno (2007): “Science in the press in Nine Latin American countries”. Brazilian Journalism Research, 3 (2), 77-96.
• Massarani, Luisa; Buys, Bruno; Amorim, Luis H. and Veneu, Fernanda (2005): “Science Journalism in Latin America: A case study of seven newspapers in the region”. Journal of Science Communication, 4 (3), http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/04/03/A040302 [Consulta: 29 de mayo de 2017]
• Matheson, Donald (2004): “Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: Some trends in online journalism”. New Media & Society, 6 (4): 443–68, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144804044329
• Messing, Solomon & Westwood, Sean J. (2014): “Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online”. Communication Research, 41 (8), 1042-1063, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
• Mitchelstein, Eugenia & Boczkowski Pablo J. (2009): “Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production”. Journalism, 10 (5), 562–586, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884909106533
• Myers, Greg (2010): The discourse of blogs and wikis. London–New York, Continuum.
• Nielsen, Kristian H. & Schmidt Kjærgaard, Rikke (2011): “News coverage of climate change in nature news and science now during 2007”. Environmental Communication, 5 (1), 25-44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.520722
• Peters, Hans P. (1995): “The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures”. Media, Culture & Society, 17 (1), 31-48, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016344395017001003
• Pires de Almeida, Maria Antónia (2013): “Epidemics in the news: Health and hygiene in the press in periods of crisis”. Public Understanding of Science, 22 (7), 886-902, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662512473212
• Polino, Carmelo & Castelfranchi, Yurij (2012): “The ‘Communicative Turn’in Contemporary Techno-science: Latin American Approaches and Global Tendencies”, in Schiele, Bernard; Claessens, Michel; and Shi, Shunke (eds.): Science Communication in the World (3-17). Dordrecht, Springer.
• Polino, Carmelo; Chiappe, Dolores; y Fazio, María Eugenia (2006): Análisis de la oferta informativa sobre ciencia y tecnología en los principales diarios argentinos. Buenos Aires, SECYT.
• Pont Sorribes, Carles; Cortiñas Rovira, Sergi; and Di Bonito, Ilaria (2013): “Challenges and opportunities for science journalists in adopting new technologies: the case of Spain”. Journal of Science Communication, 12 (03), https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM1203%282013%29A05_en.pdf [Consulta: 28 de mayo de 2017]
• Reese, Stephen D.; Rutigliano, Lou; Hyun, Kideuk; and Jeong, Jaekwan (2007): “Mapping the blogosphere: Professional and citizen-based media in the global news arena”. Journalism, 8 (3), 235–261, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884907076459.
• Rensberger, Boyce (2009): “Science journalism: Too close for comfort”. Nature, 459, 1055–1056, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4591055a
• Rosen, Cecilia; Guenther, Lars; and Froehlich, Klara (2016): “The Question of Newsworthiness: A Cross-Comparison among Science Journalists’ Selection Criteria in Argentina, France, and Germany”. Science Communication, 38 (3), 328-355, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547016645585
• Rozo, Claudia (2006): “Representaciones de cultura científica y cultura tecnológica desde los medios de comunicación. Diario El Tiempo, caso de estudio”, en I Congreso Iberoamericano De Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, Ciudad de México, www.oei.es/historico/memoriasctsi/mesa5/m05p16.pdf [Consulta: 27 de mayo de 2017]
• Santamaría, David D. (2004): “Professional Routines in Catalan Online Newsrooms—Online Journalism in Real Contexts”, en II Congreso Online del Observatorio para la Cibersociedad. http://www.cibersociedad.net/congres2004/grups/fitxacom_publica2.php?group=89&id=112&idioma=es [Consulta: 15 de mayo de 2017]
• Schäfer, Mike S. (2009): “From public understanding to public engagement: An empirical assessment of changes in science coverage”. Science Communication, 30 (4), 475-505, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547008326943
• Schäfer, Mike S. (2011): “Sources, characteristics and effects of mass media communication on science: a review of the literature, current trends and areas for future research”. Sociology Compass, 5 (6), 399-412, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x
• Shoemaker, Pamela J. & Vos, Tim P. (2009): Gatekeeping theory. Abingdon, Routledge.
• Singer, Jane B. (2014): “User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space”. New Media & Society, 16 (1), 55-73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833
• Steensen, Steen (2009): “The shaping of an online feature journalist”. Journalism 10 (5), 702-718, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884909106540
• Summ, Annika y Volpers, Anna-Maria (2016): “What’s science? Where’s science? Science journalism in German print media”. Public Understanding of Science, 25 (7), 775-790, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515583419
• Trench, Brian (2007): “How the internet changed science journalism”, en Bauer, Massimiano & Bucchi, Martin (eds.): Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication: Between News and Public Relations (133-141). New York, Routledge.
• Trench, Brian (2009): “Science reporting in the electronic embrace of the internet”, en Holliman, Richard et al. (eds.): Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media (166-179). London, Oxford University Press.
• Veneu, Fernanda; Amorim, Luis Henrique; and Massarani, Luisa (2008): “Science journalism in Latin America: how the scientific information from a scientific source is accommodated when it is transformed into a journalistic story”. Journal of Science Communication, 7 (1), https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/07/01/Jcom0701%282008%29A03 [Consulta: 5 de mayo de 2017]
• Vu, Hong Tie (2014): “The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection”. Journalism, 15 (8), 1094-1110, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884913504259
• Weingart, Peter; Engels, Anita; and Pansegrau, Petra (2000): “Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media”. Public Understanding of Science, 9 (3), 261-283, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
• White, David M. (1950): “The ‘Gate Keeper’. A Case Study in the Selection of News”. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383-390, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403
• Winter, Stephan & Krämer, Nicole C. (2012): “Selecting science information in Web 2.0: How source cues, message sidedness, and need for cognition influence users’ exposure to blog posts”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18 (1), 80–96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01596.x
• Zamith, Rodrigo; Pinto, Juliet; and Villar, Maria Elena (2013): “Constructing climate change in the Americas: An analysis of news coverage in US and South American newspapers”. Science Communication, 35 (3), 334-357, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547012457470