Psychometric Properties of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire -Children

  1. Daniela M Salazar
  2. Francisco J Ruiz
  3. Cindy L Flórez
  4. Juan C Suárez Falcón
Revista:
International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

ISSN: 1577-7057

Año de publicación: 2018

Volumen: 18

Número: 3

Páginas: 273-287

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

Resumen

Empirical research on pliance, a functional class of rule-governed behavior, has been scarce in children. This study aims to develop a children version of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire (GPQ), a self-report developed for adults that has shown excellent psychometric properties, a one-factor structure, and criterion validity. In so doing, we adapted the vocabulary of some the GPQ items and eliminated the items with content typical of adult life. Afterwards, the GPQ for children (i.e., GPQ-C) was administered to a sample of 797 Colombian children from 8 to 13 years. All items of the GPQ-C showed good discrimination indexes and the whole questionnaire showed adequate internal consistency. A cross-validation study was conducted to analyze the factor structure of the questionnaire. The analysis showed that a one-factor structure showed a good fit to the data. The GPQ-C showed measurement invariance across gender and age group. Girls obtained higher scores than boys on the GPQ-C. Also, the GPQ-C scores seemed to decrease with age. The GPQ-C strongly correlated with measures of psychological inflexibility, repetitive negative thinking, pathological worry, and emotional symptoms. In conclusion, the GPQ-C seems to be a valid and reliable measure of generalized pliance for children.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barnes Holmes Y, Barnes Holmes D, McHugh L, & Hayes SC (2004). Relational frame theory: Some implications for understanding and treating human psychopathology. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 355-375.
  • Barnes Holmes D, O’Hora D, Roche B, Hayes SC, Bissett RT, & Liddy F (2001). Understanding and verbal regulation. In SC Hayes, D Barnes Holmes, & B Roche (Eds). Relational frame theory. A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 103-117). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Berg EA (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15-22. Doi: 10.1080/00221309.1948.9948.9918159.
  • Bijttebier P, Raes F, Vasey MW, Bastin M, & Ehring TW (2015). Assessment of repetitive negative thinking in children: The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire -Child Version (PTQ-C). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 164-170. Doi: 10.1177/1073191117693923.
  • Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, & Zettle RD (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire -II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676-688. Doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.
  • Castillo S, Sibaja D, Carpintero L, & Romero Acosta K (2015). Estudio de los estilos de crianza en niños, niñas y adolescentes en Colombia: un estado del arte. Búsqueda, 15, 64-70.
  • Catania AC, Matthews BA, & Shimoff EH (1990). Properties of rule-governed behaviour and their implications. In DE Blackman & H Lejeune (Eds), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 215-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Chen FF (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464-504. Doi: 10.1880/10705510701301834.
  • Cheung GW & Rensvold RB (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255. Doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
  • Chorpita BF, Tracey SA, Brown TA, Collica TJ, & Barlow DH (1997). Assessment of worry in children and adolescents: An adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 569-581. Doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00116-7.
  • Dymond S, Cella M, Cooper A, & Turnbull O (2010). The contingency-shifting variant Iowa Gambling Task: An investigation with young adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 239-248. Doi: 10.1080/13803390902971115.
  • Ferrando PJ & Lorenzo Seva U (2017). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, in press. Doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308.
  • Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M Flaxman, PE Campbell L, & Remington B (2014). The development and initial validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy, 45, 83-101. Doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001.
  • Grant DA & Berg EA (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404-411. Doi: 10.1037/h0059831.
  • Greco LA, Lambert W, & Baer RA (2008). Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment, 20, 93-102. Doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.93.
  • Hayes SC (1989). Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Hayes SC, Barnes Holmes D, & Roche B (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Hayes SC, Brownstein AJ, Zettle RD, Rosenfarb I, & Korn Z (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237-256. Doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237.
  • Hayes SC, Gifford EV, & Hayes GJ (1998). Moral behavior and the development of verbal regulation. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 253-279. Doi: 10.1007/BF03391967.
  • Hayes SC, Gifford EV, & Ruckstuhl LE (1996). Relational frame theory and executive function: A behavioral approach. In GR Lyon & NA Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 279-305). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
  • Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, & Lillis, J (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.
  • Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG, Bissett R, Pistorello J, Toarmino D, & McCurry SM (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553-578. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395492.
  • Hayes SC, Zettle R, & Rosenfarb I (1989). Rule-following. In SC Hayes (Ed.), Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191-220). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Hu L & Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Jöreskog KG (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Lincolnwood, IL: Technical report, Scientific Software International.
  • Jöreskog KG & Sörbom D (1999). LISREL 8.30. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  • Kelloway EK (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kissi A, Hughes S, De Schryver M, De Houwer J, & Crombez G (in press). Examining the moderating impact of plys and tracks on the insensitivity effect: A preliminary investigation. The Psychological Record. Doi: 10.1007/s40732-018-0286-z.
  • Kissi A, Hughes S, Mertens G, Barnes Holmes D, De Houwer J, & Crombez G (2017). A systematic review of pliance, tracking, and augmenting. Behavior Modification, 41, 683-707. Doi: 10.1177/0145445517693811.
  • Kline RB (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • López JC, Ruiz FJ, Feder J, Barbero A, Suárez JJ, Rodríguez JA, & Luciano C (2010). The role of experiential avoidance in the performance on a high cognitive demand task. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 475-488.
  • Lorenzo Seva U & Ferrando PJ (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, 38, 88-91. Doi: 10.3758/BF03192753.
  • Lorenzo Seva U & Van Ginkel JR (2016). Multiple Imputation of missing values in exploratory factor analysis of multidimensional scales: Estimating latent trait scores. Anales de Psicología, 32, 596-608. Doi: 10.6018/ analesps.29.1.137901.
  • Lovibond PF & Lovibond SH (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335-343. Doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.
  • Luciano C, Gómez Becerra I, & Valdivia Salas S (2002). Consideraciones acerca del desarrollo de la personalidad desde un marco funcional-contextual [Considerations about the development of personality from a functionalcontextual standpoint]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2, 173-197.
  • Luciano C, Valdivia Salas S, Cabello Luque F, & Hernández M. (2009). Developing self-directed rules. In RA Rehfeldt & Y Barnes Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding. Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 335-352). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
  • Luciano C, Valdivia Salas S, & Ruiz FJ (2012). The self as the context for rule-governed behavior. In L McHugh & I Stewart (Eds.), The self and perspective taking: Research and applications (pp. 143-160). Oakland, CA: Context Press.
  • Matthews BA, Shimoff E, Catania C, & Sagvolden T (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453-467. Doi: 10.1901/ jeab.1977.27-453.
  • McAuliffe D, Hughes S, & Barnes Holmes D (2014). The dark-side of rule governed behavior: An experimental analysis of problematic rule-following in an adolescent population with depressive symptomatology. Behavior Modification, 38, 587-613. Doi: 10.1177/0145445514521630.
  • Millsap RE, & Yun-Tein J (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479-515. Doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4.
  • Monestès JL, Villatte M, Stewart I, & Loas G (2014). Rule-based insensitivity and delusion maintenance in schizophrenia. The Psychological Record, 64, 329-338.Doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2017.08.003.
  • Muñiz J, Elosua P, & Hambleton RK (2013). International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25, 151-157.Doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24.
  • O’Connor M, Byrne P, Ruiz FJ, & McHugh L (2017). Generalized pliance in relation to contingency insensitivity and mindfulness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Pestle SL, Chorpita BF, & Schiffman J (2008). Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for children in a large clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 465-471. Doi: 10.1080/15374410801955896.
  • Ruiz FJ (2010). A review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 125-162.
  • Ruiz FJ, García Martín MB, Suárez Falcón JC, & Odriozola González P (2017). The hierarchical factor structure of the Spanish version of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 17, 97-105.
  • Ruiz FJ, Monroy Cifuentes A, & Suárez Falcón JC (2018). Penn State Worry Questionnaire-11 validity in Colombia and factorial equivalence across gender and nonclinical and clinical samples. Anales de Psicología, 34, 451-457. Doi: 10.6018/analesps.34.3.300281.
  • Ruiz FJ, Suárez Falcón JC, Barbero Rubio A, & Flórez CL (in press). Development and initial validation of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. Doi: 10.1016/j. jcbs.2018.03.003
  • Salazar DM, Ruiz FJ, & García Martín MB (2018). Generalized pliance and insensitivity to contigencies in children with learning difficulties. Unpublished manuscript. Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz.
  • Sandín B, Chorot P, Valiente RM, & Lostao L (2009). Validación española del cuestionario de preocupación PSWQ: estructura factorial y propiedades psicométricas [Spanish validation of the PSWQ Worry Questionnaire: Facture structure and psychometric properties]. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 14, 107-122. Doi: 10.5944/rppc.vol.14.num.2.2009.4070.
  • Skinner BF (1966). An operant analysis of problem solving. In B Kleinmuntz (Ed), Problem solving: Research, method and theory (pp. 133-171). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Smout M, Davies M, Burns N, & Christie A (2014). Development of the Valuing Questionnaire (VQ). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3, 164-172. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.001.
  • Timmerman ME, & Lorenzo Seva U (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209-220. Doi: 10.1037/a0023353.
  • Törneke N, Luciano C, & Valdivia Salas S (2008). Rule-governed behavior and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 141-156.
  • Turnbull O, Evans C, Kemish K, Park S, & Bowman C (2006). A novel set-shifting modification of the Iowa Gambling Task: Flexible emotion-based learning in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 20, 290-298. Doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.290.
  • Valdivia Salas S, Martín Albo J, Zaldívar P, Lombas AS, & Jiménez TI (2017). Spanish validation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y). Assessment, 24, 919-931. Doi: 0.1177/1073191116632338.
  • Vaughan M (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis. In SC Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 97-118). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Wulfert E, Greenway DE, Farkas P, Hayes SC, & Dougher MJ (1994). Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule‐governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 659-671. Doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-659.
  • Zettle RD (2007). ACT for depression. A clinician’s guide to using Acceptance & Commitment Therapy in treating depression. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
  • Zettle RD & Hayes SC (1982). Rule-governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive-behavior therapy. Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research and Therapy, 1, 73-118.
  • Zettle RD, Hocker TR, Mick KA, Scofield BE, Petersen CL, Song H, & Sudarijanto RP (2005). Differential strategies in coping with pain as a function of level of experiential avoidance. The Psychological Record, 55, 511-524.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet