Validity evidence of the spanish version of the automatic thoughts questionnaire–8 in colombia

  1. Francisco Ruiz 1
  2. Juan Suárez-Falcón 2
  3. Diana Riaño-Hernández 1
  1. 1 Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz
    info

    Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz

    Bogotá, Colombia

    ROR https://ror.org/03ca7a577

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revue:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Année de publication: 2017

Volumen: 20

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2017.7 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Résumé

The Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ) is a widely used, 30-item, 5-point Likert-type scale that measures the frequency of negative automatic thoughts as experienced by individuals suffering from depression. However, there is some controversy about the factor structure of the ATQ, and its application can be too time-consuming for survey research. Accordingly, an abbreviated, 8-item version of the ATQ has been proposed. The aim of this study was to analyze the validity evidence of the Spanish version of the ATQ-8 in Colombia. The ATQ-8 was administered to a total of 1587 participants, including a sample of undergraduates, one of general population, and a clinical sample. The internal consistency across the different samples was good (α = .89). The one-factor model found in the original scale showed a good fit to the data (RMSEA = .083, 90% CI [.074, .092]; CFI = .96; NNFI = .95). The clinical sample’s mean score on the ATQ-8 was significantly higher than the scores of the nonclinical samples. The ATQ-8 was sensitive to the effects of a 1-session acceptance and commitment therapy focused on disrupting negative repetitive thinking. ATQ-8 scores were significantly related to dysfunctional schemas, emotional symptoms, mindfulness, experiential avoidance, satisfaction with life, and dysfunctional attitudes. In conclusion, the Spanish version of the ATQ-8 showed good psychometric properties in Colombia.

Références bibliographiques

  • Antony M. M., Bieling P. J., Cox B. J., Enns M. W., & Swinson R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181. https://doi. org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176
  • Atienza F. L., Pons D., Balaguer I., & García-Merita M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents]. Psicothema, 12, 314–319.
  • Beck A. T., Rush A. J., Shaw B. F., & Emery G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Bond F. W., Hayes S. C., Baer R. A., Carpenter K. M., Guenole N., Orcutt H. K., … Zettle R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. beth.2011.03.007
  • Brown K. W., & Ryan R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
  • Bryant F. B., & Baxter W. J. (1997). The structure of positive and negative automatic cognition. Cognition & Emotion, 11, 225–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999397379908
  • Cano-García F. J., & Rodríguez-Franco L. (2002). Evaluación del lenguaje interno ansiógeno y depresógeno en la experiencia de dolor crónico [Assessment of anxious and depressive self-talk in chronic pain experience]. Apuntes de Psicología, 20, 329–346.
  • Chen F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  • Cheung G. W., & Rensvold R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  • Chioqueta A. P., & Stiles T. C. (2004). Norwegian version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: A reliability and validity study. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 33, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070310016031
  • Chioqueta A. P., & Stiles T. C. (2006). Factor structure of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Form A) and the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 99, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.1.239-247
  • Clark L. A., Watson D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/10403590.7.3.309
  • Cortina J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha: An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  • Daza P., Novy D. M., Stanley M., & Averill P. (2002). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21: Spanish translation and validation with a Hispanic sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 195–205.
  • Deardorf P. A., Hopkins L. R., & Finch A. J. Jr. (1984). Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: A reliability and validity study. Psychological Reports, 55, 708–710. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.3.708
  • De Graaf L. E., Roelofs J., & Huibers M. J. H. (2009). Measuring dysfunctional attitudes in the general population: The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (form A) revised. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9229-y
  • Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larsen R. J., & Griffin S. (1985). The satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  • Elosua P., Mujika J., Almeida L. S., & Hermosilla D. (2014). Procedimientos analítico-racionales en la adaptación de tests. Adaptación al español de la Batería de Pruebas de Razonamiento [Judgmental-analytical procedures for adapting tests: Adaptation to Spanish of the Reasoning Tests Battery]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70015-9
  • Ghassemzadeh H., Mojtabai R., Karamghadiri N., & Ebrahimkhani N. (2006). Psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: ATQ-Persian. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 52, 127–137. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0020764006062095
  • Goldberg D., & Williams P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
  • Hayes S. C., Strosahl K. D., & Wilson K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. An experiential approach to behavior change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hollon S. D., & Kendall P. C. (1980). Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178214
  • Hollon S. D., Kendall P. C., & Lumry A. (1986). Specificity of depressotypic cognitions in clinical depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.52
  • Hu L., & Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jöreskog K. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL. Lincolnwood, IL: Technical report, Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user’s reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (1999). LISREL 8.30. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
  • Joseph S. (1994). Subscales of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1994.9914786
  • Kazdin A. E. (1990). Evaluation of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire: Negative processes and depression among children. Psychological Assessment, 2, 73–79. https://doi. org/10.1037/1040-3590.2.1.73
  • Kelloway E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kline R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Millsap R. E., & Yun-Tein J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327906MBR3903_4
  • Murray C. J. L., & López A. D. (1996). The global burden of disease and injury series: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Netemeyer R. G., Williamson D. A., Burton S., Biswas D., Jindal S., Landreth S., … Primeaux S. (2002). Psychometric properties of shortened versions of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 111–129. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013164402062001008
  • Nezu A. M., Ronan G. F., Meadows E. A., & Clure K. S. (2000). Practitioner’s guide to empirically-based measures of depression. Clinical assessment series. (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Oei T. P. S., & Mukhtar F. (2008). Exploratory and confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-Malay) in Malaysia. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 92–100.
  • Rocha K., Pérez K., Rodríguez-Sanz M., Borrell C., & Obiols J. E. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población española [Psychometric properties and normative scores of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in general Spanish population]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 125–139.
  • Ruiz F. J., García-Martín M. B., Suárez-Falcón J. C., & Odriozola-González P. (2017). The hierarchical factor structure of the Spanish version of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 17, 93–101.
  • Ruiz F. J., Langer A. I., Luciano C., Cangas A. J., & Beltrán I. (2013). Measuring experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility: The Spanish translation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Psicothema, 25, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2011.239
  • Ruiz F. J., & Odriozola-González P. (2016). The role of psychological inflexibility in Beck’s cognitive model of depression. Anales de Psicología, 32, 441–447.
  • Ruiz F. J., Riaño-Hernández D., Suárez-Falcón J. C., & Luciano C. (2016). Effect of a one-session ACT protocol in disrupting repetitive negative thinking. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 16, 213–233.
  • Ruiz F. J., Suárez-Falcón J. C., Barón-Rincón D., Barrera Acevedo A., Martínez-Sánchez A., & Peña A. (2016). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale Revised in Colombian undergraduates. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlp.2015.10.002
  • Ruiz F. J., Suárez-Falcón J. C., Cárdenas-Sierra S., Durán Y. A., Guerrero K., & Riaño-Hernández D. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II in Colombia. The Psychological Record, 66, 429–437. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0183-2
  • Ruiz F. J., Suárez-Falcón J. C., Odriozola-González P., Barbero-Rubio A., López-López J. C., Eisenbeck N., … Gil E. (2015). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale-Revised. Behavioral Psychology, 23, 287–303.
  • Ruiz F. J., Suárez-Falcón J. C., & Riaño-Hernández D. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in Colombian undergraduates. Suma Psicológica, 23, 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sumpsi.2016.02.003
  • Sahin N. H., & Sahin N. (1992). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 334–340.
  • Soler J., Tejedor R., Feliu-Soler A., Pascual J. C., Cebolla A., Soriano J., … Pérez V. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) [Psychometric propoerties of the Spanish versión of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 40, 18–25.
  • Zettle R. D., Webster B. K., Gird S. R., Wagener A. L., & Burdsal C. A. (2013). Factor structure of the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire in a clinical sample. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 280–291. https://doi. org/10.1521/ijct.2013.6.3.280
La source de données: Dialnet